Sentences with phrase «warming the experts considered»

Global Warming The experts considered four solutions in this area: investing only in mitigation of greenhouse - gas emissions; investing in mitigation and research and development into low ‐ carbon energy technology; investing only in research and development into low ‐ carbon energy technology; investing in a combination of mitigation, research and development and adaptation.

Not exact matches

Global warming has become such an overriding emergency that some climate experts are willing to consider schemes for partly shielding the planet from the sun's rays.

If you were to follow the logic of your typical global - warming septic, then you would consider homeopaths to be every bit as qualified as the genuine experts that you * did * consult.

Climate realists say that the entire global - warming behemoth ought to be axed entirely — especially considering recent developments that experts say have thoroughly debunked the United Nations» warming theories and wildly inaccurate computer models.

Many experts consider 2 °C of warming to be unacceptably high, increasing the risk of deadly heat waves, droughts, flooding, and extinctions.

there is indeed limited argument regarding recent warming as long as the discussion is based on «official» global data bases; as soon as you consider a) all «comments» on data quality and significance, temperature data as included in GHCN, Crutem, Giss are heavily contested by experts from more than 15 countries, including «smaller» countries like he US, Canada, the entire Northern Europe, Russia....

The experts also considered benefits, but the very term «vulnerability» showed that by now most of them believed the net effects of greenhouse warming would be harmful.

The experts say their research DOES NOT UNDERMINE THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS THAT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES FROM HUMAN ACTIVITY DRIVE GLOBAL WARMING, BUT THEY CALL FOR A CLOSER EXAMINATION OF THE WAY CLIMATE COMPUTER MODELS CONSIDER WATER VAPOUR.

Villach conference declares expert consensus that some global warming seems inevitable, calls on governments to consider international agreements to restrict emissions.

First, it appears to me that sea level rise is a proxy for what you experts consider important — ocean expansion due to warming and run - off from melting land - based glaciers, and from what I'm reading in these posts it is a poor proxy.

I think that it is an interesting and important question, and while I fully agree that there is some degree of uncertainty, I'm also not inclined to reject the analysis of experts in the area — nor the fact that an analysis that returns warming is considered probable by the majority of them.

Improving each aspect of climate analysis is essential, many experts say, if the country is to move from pondering what to do about a general warming trend to considering consequences for particular regions and the likely impact on agriculture, ecosystems and water supplies.

And I see biochemist Bruce Ames is still on that list too; which is odd, since he told me six months ago that he doesn't consider himself to be a «global warming expert», cc» ing Joe Bast and saying «I will send a copy of this to Joseph Bast, the director of Heartland, who I am sure will take my name off the list.»

However, considered as an ensemble of individual expert opinions, the assemblage of local representations of climate establishes both the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period as climatic anomalies with worldwide imprints, extending earlier results by Bryson et al. (1963), Lamb (1965), and numerous intervening research efforts.

I've argued with countless people about global warming, and I consider myself an armchair expert on the matter; take that as you will.

Villach Conference declares consensus among experts that some global warming seems inevitable, calls on governments to consider international agreements to restrict emissions.

Here, 130 scientists and policy experts are taking a detailed look at a world warmed by twice the amount that's usually considered dangerous.

Though he has contributed since the early 1990s to reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — the large collaboration of scientists that regularly assesses global warming for the United Nations — Christy considers the expert consensus overstated and unduly alarmist.