Not exact matches
Locking up the
data behind closed doors, a
pay wall, manipulating the
data, eradicating
warm periods from the past (cooling the past) and throwing away = destroying the original
data should be regarded as an offense or at least a dereliction of duty or even fraud.
«You should be
paying more attention to the actual temperature
data to tell whether the Earth is
warming or not.
And instead of
paying attention to the science and the real - world
data (which show there has been no statistically significant «global
warming» since January 1997), we've fallen prey to the doomy prognostications of overpromoted climate activists such as Flannery, Viner and Al Gore.
There are other
data sets out there that do not support Global
Warming - that take into account the Urban Heat Island Effect - and
pay more attention to the background than to those urban areas.
This is spurious in my mind because 1) you have not
paid sufficient attention to the fact that the DGP can in fact have a non-linear deterministic trend and 2) that you can fit other ARIMA (p, 1, q) models to
data which will show a significant
warming trend (as B & V did).