Taking the definition as» (
Wasted votes for party A - Wasted votes for B) / total votes» generalises to multi-party elections:
The BNP polled 132,094 in my region, whereas there were around four times this in wasted «spare» votes for parties 1 - 4 and
wasted votes for parties 6 - 12.
Not exact matches
By converting «
wasted» presidential
votes into «none of the above» or support
for third -
party candidates in Oklahoma, Arizona and other deep red states in the South — the Confederacy, essentially — black voters would exert pressure on
party leaders to not take black voters and their issues
for granted.
You also have people who can register as a specfic
party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the
party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a
vote for a 3rd
party candidate is a
waste, If the only way you feel your
vote matters is by
voting for one of 2
parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?
They could
vote for a
party that supports a proportional representation (PR)
voting system but, due to FPP's winner - takes - all setup, their
vote would likely go to
waste.
For instance, Labour's overall share of the
vote increased in 2015, relative to the 2010 General Election, by 1.5 %, but the extent of the
party's support / seat losses in Scotland to the Scottish National Party (returning with just 1 of the 41 seats that the party had won there in 2010) meant that most of the 701,147 votes won by Labour in Scotland were effectively wasted v
party's support / seat losses in Scotland to the Scottish National
Party (returning with just 1 of the 41 seats that the party had won there in 2010) meant that most of the 701,147 votes won by Labour in Scotland were effectively wasted v
Party (returning with just 1 of the 41 seats that the
party had won there in 2010) meant that most of the 701,147 votes won by Labour in Scotland were effectively wasted v
party had won there in 2010) meant that most of the 701,147
votes won by Labour in Scotland were effectively
wasted votes.
The system provides approximately proportional representation, enables
votes to be cast
for individual candidates rather than
for parties, and — compared to first - past - the - post
voting — reduces «
wasted»
votes (
votes on sure losers or sure winners) by transferring them to other candidates.
The «two - real -
parties» system is a byproduct of that caused by people not
voting for third
parties because they don't want to
waste their
vote.
I like what you're getting at, but is there any precedent
for defining
wasted votes for the winning
party as the difference between the winning
party and the second - place
party?
We still see a hung Parliament — that's what people
voted for, after all — but there is better representation
for smaller
parties, far less divisive regional / national results, and, crucially, millions fewer
wasted votes or tactically - cast ballots.
This can be further generalised to ranked
voting systems, as then some of the first choice
votes for parties C and D would be redistributed to winning candidates, and so wouldn't be counted as «
wasted».
A member of the New Patriotic
Party (NPP), Gabby Asare Otchere Darko has described the case filed at the Supreme Court
for an order to compel the Electoral Commission to announce special
voting results on the day it is held as a
waste of energy.
Local success boosted the
party's chances in Westminster elections as voters were more likely to support the Liberal Democrats where it had a chance of winning, thereby diluting concerns that
voting for the
party would be a
wasted effort.
Also, is it possible that voters might support 100 % of a
party's policies but choose to
vote for another
party (or not
vote at all) because his / her
vote would otherwise go to
waste?
She recalled that while canvassing
for votes, the need to provide jobs was clearly on the mind of the Governor, and according to her, he
wasted no time in setting up the ETF Board made up of people with proven track record, as well as transferring N6.25 billion
for the initiative to kick off, while the Board ensured that the process was fair and transparent with no favour as to
party, religion, tribe or faith, and covered all the 57 Councils in the State.
Despite this, the Daily Mirror remained loyal to Labour and urged its readers to
vote for the
party (now led by Michael Foot), condemning the Thatcher - led Tory government
for its «
waste of our nation», [38] condemning the rise in unemployment that Thatcher's Conservative government had seen in its first term in power largely due to monetarist economic policies to reduce inflation, though the government's previously low popularity had dramatically improved since the success of the Falklands conflict a year earlier.
Then, in 2020, there could be dozens of seats in which the «
wasted vote» argument
for sticking to the two big
parties won't apply, and tactical
voting could help Ukip and the Greens.
Mr. Faso puts himself forward as one who would not
waste time on pointless
party - line
votes against the Affordable Care Act or
for defunding Planned Parenthood.
Mr. Faso puts himself forward as one who would not
waste time on pointless
party - line
votes against the Affordable Care Act or
for defunding Planned
Voting
for a third
party (a so called «protest
vote») is anything but a
wasted vote.»