April 9, 2012: U.S. EPA overstepped its authority when it vetoed a Clean
Water Act permit issued for a sprawling mountaintop - removal coal mining project in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled today.
In this case, the Ninth Circuit held that every culvert and ditched that channeled rainwater runoff from forest roads was a discharge from a point source, requiring a Clean
Water Act permit.
Arch Coal did not adopt the recommended changes for the Spruce Mine, and in early Jan. 2011, EPA officials revoked the operation's Clean
Water Act permit, citing «destructive and unsustainable mining practices» proposed by the company.
On March 2, 2010 the EPA announced that it had granted a Clean
Water Act permit for the Hobet 45 mine in Lincoln County, West Virginia after Hobet Mining LLC, a company owned by Patriot Coal, had agreed to additional «significant protections» against environmental impacts.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a section 404 Clean
Water Act permit to a Massey Coal subsidiary for the Reylas Surface Mine in Logan County, West Virginia.
A congressional investigation disclosed that companies across the country have illegally injected millions of gallons of diesel fuel underground without obtaining Safe Drinking
Water Act permits.
• Worker safety standards enforced under the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Mine Safety and Health Act • Clean
Water Act permitting of wastewater and stormwater discharges • Clean Air Act emissions regulation • Hazardous waste management and underground storage tank requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) • Spill and chemical reporting and release prevention under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Emergency Planning and Community Right - to - Know Act, Oil Pollution Act, and Clean Water Act • Regulation of chemical manufacturing and distribution under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) • Environmental disclosures under Regulation S - K of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and corporate reporting of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters to the public and interested investors
Not exact matches
The 1972 Clean
Water Act makes it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a single identifiable source — such as a pipe — into certain bodies of water without a pe
Water Act makes it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a single identifiable source — such as a pipe — into certain bodies of
water without a pe
water without a
permit.
Last fall Bryson decided that, under the Clean
Water Act, it would need a
permit to discharge lead, based on a similar case involving a U.S. Navy firing range in Puerto Rico.
It was ruled that a
permit was required since lead shot was falling into a
water channel in violation of the federal Clean Water
water channel in violation of the federal Clean
WaterWater Act.
U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo made the
permit a necessity in February when he agreed with Park District opponent Roger Stone's contention that the trapshooting was a violation of the federal Clean
Water Act.
Rep. Faso Vote Record Tracking Rep. Faso in the Age of Trump fivethirtyeight.com Pesticides Regulations — Vote Passed (256 - 165, 9 Not Voting) The bill would generally prohibit EPA and states from requiring that entities applying pesticides near navigable
waters must first obtain a
permit under the Clean
Water Act, if the application is authorized under -LSB-...]
But under the Clean
Water Act, by not
acting within a year of the
permit request, the DEC now has to approve the project, the suit claims.
«Other provisions within the Energy Policy Modernization
Act of 2015 would push for greater energy efficiency, updates to the energy grid, and a grid storage program; ease the
permitting of natural gas pipelines; and permanently reauthorize the Land and
Water Conservation Fund, which provides money for habitat protection.
The Safe Drinking
Water Act requires drilling companies to obtain
permits when they intend to use diesel fuel in their fracking operations.
Nationwide
permits are allowed under the Clean
Water Act for projects with «minimal cumulative environmental impacts.»
The state began to require some
permits in the 1950s, but rigorous accounting didn't begin until the Clean
Water Act brought federal agencies into play in 1972.
Currently, federal law requires carbon sequestration operators to undergo a vigorous
permitting process under the Safe Drinking
Water Act.
Properties having community wells or sewage systems will require a state operating
permit, evidence of compliance with the Safe Drinking
Water Act and Clean
Water Act and a legal binding contract to enforce the obligation of the operator to provide satisfactory service at reasonable rates - must be maintained in our file.
Those section conclude that «significant gaps remain» in regulation despite updates in some states, and they describe exemptions for fracking wastes from the Resource Recovery and Response
Act's hazardous waste requirements, from the Clean
Water Act's comprehensive
permit program for discharges into surface
waters, and from the Safe Drinking
Water Act (which regulates groundwater pollution).
Sotomayor also held that the EPA could not consider restoration measures - such as restocking fish to compensate for fish killed by an intake system - when determining the best technology available for a particular power plant. Sotomayor wrote that» [r] estoration measures are not part of the location, design, construction, or capacity of cooling
water intake structures, and a rule
permitting compliance with the statute through restoration measures allows facilities to avoid adopting any cooling
water intake structure technology at all, in contravention of the
Act's clear language as well as its technology - forcing principle.
The judge agreed that that the plant needed
permits from the Army Corp of Engineers subject to the approval of the EPA to be in compliance with the Clean
Water Act.
According to senior EPA officials, the rule, crafted by both the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers, will provide greater clarity about which
waters are subject to Clean
Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction and greater certainty about which activities require CWA
permits.
The groups contended that Millennium Bulk Terminals is violating the Clean
Water Act by handling coal without a
permit.
Using the power granted under the Clean
Water Act, DEC officials rejected the companies» permit application, citing damage the project would do to water supplies along the pipeline r
Water Act, DEC officials rejected the companies»
permit application, citing damage the project would do to
water supplies along the pipeline r
water supplies along the pipeline route.
The Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA are still
permitting mountaintop removal mining
permits in Appalachia, despite the regulations of the Clean
Water Act....
Far from a trickle, according to the EPA «110 individual and general mining
permits have been issued by the Corps of Engineers since the Obama administration began under section 404 of the Clean
Water Act.»
According to the EPA, the rule will ensure «
waters protected under the Clean
Water Act are more precisely defined and predictably determined, making
permitting less costly, easier, and faster for businesses and industry.»
They say New York State environmental officials granted
permits for the project in violation of a provision of the Federal Clean
Water Act, which prohibits new releases of anything into a lake or river that is included on a list of «impaired» water bo
Water Act, which prohibits new releases of anything into a lake or river that is included on a list of «impaired»
water bo
water bodies.
Patriot had thus violated the terms of the Clean
Water Act it promised in its
permits to observe.
Reviewing the DNR's decision de novo, but with a great weight of deference to the agency, the court concluded that any other ruling «would undermine the careful federal and state balance created by the Clean
Water Act and would thwart the finality of
permits properly issued under the WPDES
permit program.
He has successfully represented clients in matters involving hazardous substances, air and
water quality, land use, toxic torts and other environmental matters, including state and federal Superfund liability, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting and compliance issues, California's Safe Drinking Water & Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65) and hazardous waste regulatory is
water quality, land use, toxic torts and other environmental matters, including state and federal Superfund liability, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permitting and compliance issues, California's Safe Drinking
Water & Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65) and hazardous waste regulatory is
Water & Toxic Enforcement
Act (Proposition 65) and hazardous waste regulatory issues.
Erika E. Malmen (Boise) is a member of the Environment, Energy & Resources practice, representing clients in
permitting, compliance, and litigation under various statutes including the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), Clean
Water Act (CWA), Clean Air
Act (CAA), Federal Land Policy & Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Endangered Species
Act (ESA).
Provided legal project management and legal services, including Connecticut Environmental Policy
Act (CEPA) evaluations, a master agreement with the state and municipality, a strategic zoning revision, site remediation, and the negotiation of «clean standard» and Environmental Land Use Restrictions, wetland and
water resource
permitting, and local
permits and approvals.
In private practice, Tom represented clients in a wide range of federal civil and criminal litigation brought under federal environmental laws, including the Clean Air
Act, Clean
Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, while also representing clients in the environmental review and
permitting for major energy and railroad infrastructure projects.
Tags clean - data - centers Data Centers developers EA ecological protection economic EIS electricity electricity interconnection energy efficiency environmental environmental policy esa ferc land use Marathon Capital Mesa Power LLP NakNek Electric Association National Environmental Policy
Act NEPA
permits ppa public outreach puc regulations renewable Renewable Energy renewable energy
permitting REZ ROR ROW solar power Sunrise Powerlink T Boone Pickens Tessera Solar tribal issues
water power
Whilst providing some procedural rights to Indigenous peoples regarding leases, licences and
permits regulating the management of
water, the Native Title
Act has been interpreted as not imposing an obligation to comply with the common law rules of procedural fairness.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers («Corps») has proposed new and revised Nationwide
Permits («NWPs») for activities that require authorization under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act.
As part of the regulatory approval process for a new peat processing site, the Company applied for
permit under the Clean
Water Act («CWA») to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers («Corps»).
During the last two years, Republicans, like their Democratic predecessors in prior Congresses, failed to pass major overhauls of the Superfund hazardous waste law, the Endangered Species
Act, or wetlands
permitting processes (Clean
Water Act).
The EPA determined that the site contained jurisdictional wetlands under the Clean
Water Act (CWA), and that the Sacketts had failed to obtain a
permit in violation of the law.
[SWOOSH] Question: what properties require a
permit under the Clean
Water Act?
The court said that owners do not have to go through an expensive and time consuming
permit process before they can challenge the federal government - on whether their property is subject to Clean
Water Act restrictions.
Expanding federal authority under the Clean
Water Act would greatly increase the number of construction sites required to obtain appropriate
permits, which will also result in the delay or impede construction projects.
Enacted in 1987, the Clean
Water Act continues to be a source of confusion for both regulators and those subject to regulation — and just what land should fall under federal, as opposed to state or local,
permitting authority.