Not exact matches
Wealthy school districts in Connecticut
typically spent $ 1,227 more per
student than poorer ones during the 1981 - 82 school year, according to a recent state report.
«Not all of these
students were from
wealthy families but most were; as parents
typically had advanced educational degrees and median incomes much higher than national norms,» she added.
These incentives might include additional per - pupil funding for each transfer
student, construction funds to make more space available, funds to recruit and employ on - site advocates and mentors to ensure the social comfort and the pedagogic progress of these
students, and funds to underwrite their transportation by the same convenient means that
wealthy people use to transport their children to private schools — not by circuitous and exhausting bus routes, but rather by point - to - point travel,
typically in small vans, from one specific urban neighborhood to one specific school or district.
High - quality preschool improves
students» social, cognitive and developmental readiness for kindergarten, putting them on track to long - term success in school.5 The benefits are especially critical for low - income
students, who
typically hear 30 million fewer words spoken than their
wealthier peers by age 2 and face an uphill battle to early literacy and math proficiency throughout their education.6
Because
wealthy families tend to live in communities with larger tax bases and fewer needs, their children's schools have
typically spent much more per
student than have schools in poor districts.
Students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds
typically perform worse on standardized tests than their
wealthier peers.
Granted, this data may be affected by a number of different factors — merit - based scholarships do not
typically take family income into account, for instance — but the research is upsetting enough to leave some educators and families wondering whether universities are targeting and enticing
wealthy students with scholarship aid, while not offering as much funding to
students in need.
The new buildings are
typically marketed to attract the
wealthiest student, who can pay the high rents that justify the high cost of land and construction.