The poorest districts in the State have a comparatively high tax burden but raise relatively little local revenue, while
the wealthiest districts raise vastly more revenue with lower revenue efforts.
Not exact matches
If we rely on local communities to
raise funds to improve food, we'll soon have a patchwork of
wealthier (or more committed)
districts with good food, and poorer
districts (where, I would note, more children are reliant on school food) with less healthful offerings.
State Republican Party Chairman Ed Cox knocked President Barack Obama's proposal to
raise taxes on the
wealthiest earners, saying that he has failed to heed the message of the GOP victory in ninth congressional
district.
He said the disparity between
districts is mostly due to the ability of
wealthier areas to
raise more in property taxes.
One question... why is it a problem when DeBlasio
raises money to help elect Democrats in upstate
districts while the extremely
wealthy NYC real estate interests ship boatloads of money upstate for the same purpose?
I was lucky enough to be
raised in an affluent suburb, St. Charles, but as with most
wealthy communities, not too far away, there are school
districts that are severely underfunded.
Gov. Edward T. Schafer of North Dakota last week signed into law a school - finance measure that shifts some state funding from property -
wealthy school
districts to those less able to
raise money through property taxes.
Last fall, the conflict between charter and
district schools intensified after someone leaked a plan from the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation to
raise up to $ 490 million from foundations and
wealthy individuals to double the number of charter schools in the city, with the goal of enrolling about half the students in the
district within eight years.
All but the
wealthiest districts receive their funding entirely from the state rather than from local taxes, a consequence of the 1978 Proposition 13 tax initiative that left local authorities with little ability to
raise revenues.
In Texas, for example, the most recent school - funding overhaul was financed largely by forcing
wealthy districts to
raise their property - tax rates and then distributing the proceeds among their poorer neighbors.
Teachers now seek
raises by moving to
wealthier districts.
Despite the disproportionate concentration of PTA donations in affluent schools, we found that few of the
districts with the 50 richest PTAs have policies in place to respond to outsized donations to the
wealthiest schools.30 A couple of
districts place restrictions on how parent -
raised funds can be spent, such as banning their use to pay for school staff.
They have already voted no to across the board teacher salary increases and continued the freeze on teachers» salaries that has been in place for 5 years (at the same time passed a tax break for the
wealthy, and now, with reduced revenue can not give
raises), increased class size, taken away additional pay for Masters degrees, eliminated most of the state's teacher assistants, gone after tenure and offered the top 25 % of the teachers in a
district $ 500 to give up their tenure immediately, increased the number of charter schools (many funded by Republicans in the private school business) and finally, the most recent scheme pondered is to let kids go to any school in the state regardless of their home county.
Given the ability and willingness of many
wealthy districts to
raise more local revenues, it is time for the State to properly account for
district wealth and reallocate state resources from high - wealth to low - wealth
districts.
Wealthy districts» ability to raise more revenue at comparable or even lower tax rates has two impacts — wealthy districts are able to outspend poorer districts with comparable or lower tax rates, and homes of similar values are taxed at a higher rate in poorer school dis
Wealthy districts» ability to
raise more revenue at comparable or even lower tax rates has two impacts —
wealthy districts are able to outspend poorer districts with comparable or lower tax rates, and homes of similar values are taxed at a higher rate in poorer school dis
wealthy districts are able to outspend poorer
districts with comparable or lower tax rates, and homes of similar values are taxed at a higher rate in poorer school
districts.
Further, the Court found that inadequate funding from the state is leading to inequalities and disparities between
wealthy and poor school
districts, because some
districts are only able to
raise a fraction of the money through local levies as other
districts, despite having a higher local levy tax rate.
But because the money to build most schools came from property taxes,
wealthier districts could more easily
raise the substantial amount of funding needed to build and renovate school facilities.