Sentences with phrase «well association v.»

Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Limited, 2017 ABCA 124 (37627) Enforcement of, and compliance with, environmental remediation orders.

Not exact matches

Though Justice Brennan waxed eloquent about intermediate associations in Bowen v. Gilliard, where the majority had given weight to «tradition» in preferring formal to informal family arrangements, he kept his enthusiasm well under wraps in the Adolescent Family Life Act case.

Courts have also taken the position that they are not in the best position to decide sports disputes and instead defer to sport regulators and voluntary associations to make decisions according to their own rules (Indiana High School Athletic Association v. Carlberg, 1997).

Be that as it may, I find no better words than recalling those of the late Lord Denning, in Enderby Town Football Club Ltd. v. Football Association Ltd. [1971] Ch 606 - 607, who stated: «So unruly horse, it is, that no judge should ever try to mount it, lest it run away with him.

Bank of Nova Scotia v. Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck)[1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 540.

Registration — good character: A high water mark for deference to regulatory bodies assessing the «good character» of applicants was set by Alberta courts, which confirmed an Alberta regulatory body's refusal to register a BC professional (Lum v. Council of Alberta Dental Association and College, 2016 ABCA 154, summarized here, and also 2015 ABQB 12, summarized here).

When I commented on the oral arguments in Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 59, the B.C. hearing fees case, I argued that although there was a good deal of support among the various parties and interveners for the proposition that it was section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867, that rendered (excessive) court fees unconstitutional, this argument was problematic.

J. Craig Williams: Well Bob, in the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, it was decided that California law restricting the sales of violent video games to minors violated the right to free speech.

Superior Court, Appellate Division Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Homeowners» Association, N. J., 2006