Sentences with phrase «what civil judges»
Served as Moderator for a Panel Discussion by Circuit Court Judges, What Civil Judges Want You To Know, 2009
https://www.blackwell-attorneys.com/ Not exact matches
The theological issues are far from resolved; but, judging from what has happened in Bloomington, even conservative Christians (though traditionally among those most opposed to gay civil rights) are learning that theological concerns need not blind any of us to the needs and rights of homosexuals as human beings.
Evidently you find yourself able to judge how much he knew and what he did and didn't do with very little knowledge of both civil and Church due process, canon law, changes in rules, education, and procedures etc..
A «judge» orders «punishment» instead of «conversion» or «attending religious services» only because the «judge» is a religious extremist willing to violate the human rights and civil rights regardless of what anyone else thinks.
On what would have been Sean Bell's 27th birthday, a judge ruled his family's civil lawsuit against the city and the five police officers who shot and killed him can go to trial.
«And I'd quite like a court, a judge, in a civil action, to listen to what the argument for the defence is.»
What this can very likely come down to for the seller, is one day standing before a judge in a civil suit filed by the bank or JDB, holding up a bill of sale for the credit card account.
Such rules of civil practice include guidelines as to the type of information that is acceptable by a jury or judge, the method of presentation of the information, and by what standards of proof a judgment will be made based on the information.
New York Chief Judge John Lippman echoed this connection between access to civil justice and public safety when he stated: «If what happens inside this courthouse or any courthouse... is anything short, even by the smallest amount, of promoting equal justice... [t] he most vulnerable in our society, they're the ones who have suffered the most.»
This information is about your rights and your responsibilities as a self - represented litigant involved in a civil court proceeding in Canada, and what you should expect from the judges, court staff and lawyers you will meet along the way.
Last week, the Virginia Supreme Court signaled trial judges to err on the side of giving leeway to what is considered admissible relevant evidence for such civil commitment trials.
Put yourself in the position of the government and the senior judges; what would you see as the most pressing problems for a paper - bound civil justice system?
The lower court judge, known for his intolerance of civil matter inefficiencies, also identified who would give viva voce evidence at the trial and on what issues.
While we must wait to see what happens with the appeal, and whether the pre-approval procedure adopted by the motions judge is confirmed or modified, criminal and civil counsel need to be cautious how they treat productions when there is a multiplicity of legal proceedings arising from the same events.
The «Civil Matters: What to Do in Court» video provides tips and information on how to prepare for a Civil Claims trial if you are a Plaintiff, Defendant or Witness, including what documents you may need, how to present evidence, and how to address the juWhat to Do in Court» video provides tips and information on how to prepare for a Civil Claims trial if you are a Plaintiff, Defendant or Witness, including what documents you may need, how to present evidence, and how to address the juwhat documents you may need, how to present evidence, and how to address the judge.
Waiver of a right to jury trial is not the same as waiver of the right to trial: what the agreement says is that litigants would have a civil bench trial, where the judge determines whether there was a breach.
From September 2014 — September 2015 researchers at the Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution conducted over 30 interviews and 5 focus groups with justice stakeholders including lawyers, legal educators, legal entrepreneurs, legal clinic staff, policy makers, governments, judges, trusted intermediaries and users, in order to gain insight into how we might build capacity for innovation within the civil justice system and what specific innovations are required.
Judge Margaret McKeown motivated the majority's decision by saying this case isn't about password sharing in general, in spite of what civil liberties groups might be saying.
Why is what is politically expediant / efficient in governance judged by some within the civil service to be illegal in the real estate business?