Not exact matches
Really,
what I'm saying is that I have no systematic theological step - by - step delineation
about baptism but I know I love the very mystery of it, the resurrection of it, the belonging of it, and yes, wait for it, the power of it.
When people want be baptized «in the right way,» they argue
about when
baptism should take place, how much water is necessary, where the
baptism can occur, who can perform the
baptism,
what actions should be performed during the
baptism, and
what words need to be said along with the
baptism.
Well, if we translate the Greek word baptizma in Matthew 28:19 - 20, we get a clue as to
what Jesus might have actually been teaching... and this leads to the one crazy suggestion
about Matthew 28:19 - 20 that might help solve this particular
baptism debate.
Just a suggestion you can look up on YouTube David bercot
what did the early Christians believe
about salvation
what did the early Christians believe
about baptism.
I can't quite figure out
what has people upset
about this??? If you don't believe that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is true, then I am guessing you probably don't believe that the ordinance of proxy
baptism that has been done by member of that church actually means anything.
No matter
what activity was actually going on in the Corinthian church regarding «the dead», why is the discussion / controversy
about baptism and not the «true» means of salvation according to Baptists and evangelicals: an internal belief in Christ; an internal «decision» for Christ?
In polite company, and for the sake of keeping peace with each other (because mutual apostasies take so much effort), we can do with marriage
what we do with our disagreements
about eucharist and
baptism: keep our mouths shut and let God sort it out in the end.
The refusal to mean
what we say
about baptism's inclusiveness is a reflection of a society that denies children full citizenship.
What is perhaps most frustrating
about engaging in such conversations within the evangelical community in particular, however, is that differences regarding things like Calvinism and Arminianism,
baptism, heaven and hell, gender roles, homosexuality, and atonement theories often disintegrate into harsh accusations in which we question one another's commitment to Scripture.
But
what about sins committed after
baptism?
So
what then is Jesus saying Matthew 28:19 - 20 when He talks
about baptism as an element to making disciples?
Unethical or religious freedom???
What about the LDS practice of Proxy
Baptism — baptizing deceased persons of other religions into the LDS faith without the written consent of the family members of the deceased (proxy LDS
baptisms have been performed on past Catholic Popes and other top religious figures).
It generates questions
about what happened, just as water
baptism generated these questions in biblical times.
Doing this will generate questions
about what happened, and why it was done, just as water
baptism generated these questions in biblical times.
Remember, whenever we see the word «
baptism» in Scripture, we must not immediately think
about dunking somebody under water, but must first remember
what the word means, namely, «to be immersed, overcome, or fully identified with» something or somebody else.
I noticed you said, «But after this initial preaching of the Gospel and water
baptism followed by Spirit
baptism, the
baptism of the Spirit comes immediately upon a person believing in Jesus for eternal life, whether or not they get water baptized» I must loving tell you this isn't
what the bible teaches
about baptism.
The
baptism of Jesus by John in the Jordan has nothing to do with repenting of sin or getting saved, but everything to do with making a public declaration
about which side Jesus is on and
what He will live His life for.
This does not help us when we try to figure out
what a Biblical author is talking
about when he writes
about «
baptism.»
Wesley understood quite well
what his Anglican theology of
baptism told him
about the work of God in the baptized, but he also knew that the adults he now confronted in the cities of England were no longer living out of the grace of
baptism.
what I don; t understand
about the
baptism of the dead is if it's main purpose is to make dead unsaved souls enter heaven then why even the need for Satan or Hell?
What about the historic Christian sacraments like baptism and the Eucharist, and what about the liturgies of the churc
What about the historic Christian sacraments like
baptism and the Eucharist, and
what about the liturgies of the churc
what about the liturgies of the churches?
A couple of pastors are explaining the why and how of
baptism to a church that is (apparently) filled with new believers who know next to nothing
about baptism, why they should get baptized, or
what will happen at the
baptism.So they created this video and showed it in their worship service.
God makes sense to me under the trees, and God makes sense to me in poetry and prayer, and God makes sense to me in Eucharist and
Baptism and community and even creeds... but not in the offering plate, not in the building campaign, not in the pastor - who - shall - not - be-questioned, not in the politics, not in the assumptions
about what a good Christian girl ought to be.
In several cases I had to ask myself under
what circumstances I could administer
baptism to an unbaptised adult who was
about to die.
Of course Amazon, Walmart, and Target all have cute clothes that work for a day by day basis, but
what about special occasions like
baptisms or weddings?