Sentences with phrase «what about evidence»

Anyhoo, all of the above speaks to how to present a case, but what about the evidence itself?

And what about the evidence of fossilized coal and oil deposits which shows terrestrial plant carbon sequestration occurs geologically in nature?

What about evidence for any of these short - term CO2 fluctuations?

What about evidence of the school's compliance with fire, sanitation, safety, immunization and testing standards?

So what about the evidence that a detox diet and detox supplements will make any difference?

What about evidence that angels don't exist?

Not exact matches

«Everyone has a different opinion about what the solutions are, but we're presenting evidence that will enable the teams, ourselves and the (governing body) FIA to make the best decisions about the future of F1,» he added.

While some evidence has suggested a link between diabetes and Alzheimer's in recent years, there's still a lot we don't know about what causes Alzheimer's, let alone how the two conditions are connected.

Further evidence comes from the interesting fact that the parchment version of the Declaration of Independence that is on display and kept in the United States National Archives wasn't actually written until July 19th; this being a copy of the approved text that was announced to the world on July 4th, with about 150 - 200 copies being made on paper and distributed on that date (26 of which are still around today, thus pre-dating what is now generally thought of as the «original»).

Superachievers know the value of using feedback or simulations to get empirical evidence about what they're doing, as opposed to relying on gut instinct.

«My biggest concern is people who put serious weight into these rankings, make decisions about where to choose to apply, where to go to school, what tuition to pay when there's so little tangible, evidence - based information that lies below that ranking.»

Scientists can be passionate about their point of view, but they also listen to what everyone else is saying and that helps them gather the evidence.

Your boss may not know about everything you do, so start putting together the evidence of what a valuable employee you are.

Asked what evidence he was talking about, Pence said, «The campaign is working on bringing that information out.»

It will help you ask the important questions about what you contribute, your history within the company and what other evidence you have.

In a telephone conversation with THR, he said about Paramount Pictures: «What we need to see is continued evidence of improvement.»

The message is to encourage investors to think carefully about their risk tolerance, their true investment horizon, the extent to which they experience distress if an overvalued market advances without them, the extent to which they believe that historical evidence should inform investment decisions, and the extent to which they would be able to adhere to their investment discipline in the face of what could very well be a 50 % market loss over the completion of this cycle.

The point about e-commerce is very interesting and should be explored further, and adds to evidence even mainstream economists (like Yellen) don't know what they're doing.

We've seen a lot of evidence about what's coming, through the HomePod firmware leak, and reports including one from Bloomberg this week that outlines exactly how the iPhone interface will work without a home button, but Apple should still have plenty to reveal that we haven't seen at this event, including at least a few amazing ARKit demos.

Opinions about what might occur don't allow us to act pre-emptively without that evidence.

Foster says, «Many people point to the 2008 - 2009 downturn as evidence that bonds will save you during downturns, but what about the 5 years since then?

What is not important is spending a lot of time looking for evidence that the current state of the company is about to turn imminently or identifying «catalysts» that could initiate that turnaround.

«Unfortunately, the convenience of investing - by - slogan, rather than carefully thinking about finance and examining evidence, is currently leading investors into what is likely to be one of the worst disasters in the history of the US stock market.»

There's also evidence that you would lower the cost of capital, but that's not what we're talking about is it?

So when I say, for example, that I estimate a probability of about 80 % of fresh credit difficulties accompanied by a market plunge over the coming year, that figure is based on various combinations of historical evidence, and what has (and has not) happened afterward, and how often.

What is most uncomfortable about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.

I meant that they don't have to actually contemplate the evidence [reason] for or against what they are about to decide.

I think you need to go back and read about the scientific method and what level of evidence in needed to support a hypothesis.

If I was going to be perfectly honest with myself and with God — I needed to examine all the evidence out there and take an honest look at what was being said about these scriptures and about the gay community in general.

If there is a god then I most certainly want to know about it and what it thinks; however, I find no evidence for any gods described to me to date.

We know a lot of what we know about gene mutation and our similarities with other animals precisely because we have been working within this paradigm for which there is a ton of evidence.

It is very similar to what evolutionists say about creationists, they say they are blind to the truth... it works both ways for there is evidence of both, but you must choose what you will believe, because ultimately you are responsible for whatever choice you make...

By the evidence of the scripture (if you were to actually study it instead of making broad assumptions about it based on what you read somewhere else) God set this earth in motion.

Most atheists don't say there are no gods — we say there is not sufficient evidence to believe there are any gods or that there are gods who care about what goes on on Earth.

What would your views be about sexism say, if a female pastor or leader or any leader makle or female treated a man as if he had been opressive towards a woman with no evidence for that having happened?

There is almost no fossil evidence (which should be in abundance if true) and that what we scientifically know about life is that it reproduces according to its kind (which is all we have observed) and its highly complex.

If you really don't care about evidence, if you just wanted us to provide an answer without any interest in what we'd say, or without any care to understand our position... then I guess yeah, there's no way for me to show your beliefs to be flawed, as you've adopted a purely egocentric epistemology.

You have no idea what you are talking about with your fairy tale illusion of what you THINK salvation is all about... it's a ridiculous concept based on flawed foundations right from the get go... here is my EVIDENCE... The record in Samuel tells us that it was the Lord who tempted David to do the numbering; that in Chronicles says it was Satan.

Provide a citation for what you are talking about please and I will provide plenty of evidence to suggest otherwise.

You talk about what you think you know but have no evidence against that which you do not know.

Evidence that probably shows you more than what a human being backed with a theory about the scientific method, possible misunderstandings and personal opinions can offer you.

What you express about me and «believers» is usually not backed by objective evidence.

I saw where you think that you can argue about «fine - tuning» and strong principles, and I would assert that's because you don't even know what the most implicating evidence even is... thanks to your god, Copernicus.

My deconversion was a long process, and it had almost nothing to do with what I now believe to be the evil of religion — it was about what I thought to be true, and what there seemed to be evidence for.

Robert See, I find that anyone who denies what scientific evidence objectively reveals in favour of what they personally think must be correct without any evidence whatsoever must be operating out of the same harmful pride you're talking about.

He was supposedly 500,000 years old, but all evidence of him has disappeared... What about Neanderthal Man?

I call BS on Jimbo about «a huge avalanche of historical evidence and archeology» and I call BS on your statement because you only refer to «common knowledge» I've seen what Christian common knowledge is like and it often runs a bit shy on facts..

Now I'd need evidence souls were real, before I would care about what people imagines happens to them after death.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

These folks are just as certain as you are, and have the exact same amount evidence about what happens after we die to back them up (none).