What about your intellectual property?
Not exact matches
What's most telling
about the midyear best - seller list is the number of new
intellectual properties on it.
«Our core advantage is
what we've said all along, which is that it's
about the
intellectual property and the software, not
about who's got the most real estate,» Hurd added.
From the beginning, set clear guidelines
about what the product should be able to do, which consumer needs and organizational goals should be met, or which
intellectual property issues need to be considered.
When you think
about what to include in the investment cash flow portion of your statement, consider things like marketing and brand recognition expenses, purchases of equipment or
intellectual property, or any goodwill efforts you've made.
It also prompted a discussion with his postdoc adviser
about what intellectual property was the adviser's and
what ideas Manns could take with him — a dialogue that too seldom occurs as explicitly or as early as it should, Manns believes.
Merrion continues to talk to interested parties
about possible sales / licensing of their
intellectual property, but there's no way to discern
what upside this process might offer.
So third parties being underwhelming is simply just an opinion anyone could say that
about any publisher but
what is not is AAA new
intellectual properties this shows that third parties are not just resting on existing Concepts alone.
Based on a Columbia University conference organized by the National Arts Journalism Program, The New Gatekeepers explores the reconfigured ranks of those who decide
what the public gets to see, hear and read, from struggles over
intellectual property and copyright, to continuing debates
about acceptable and offensive content in the cultural marketplace, to the less visible biases of the arts funding system.
So
what's an amateur jurisprude to teach today
about the state of
intellectual property?
Whether you believe that non-compete agreements are an infringement on innovators» personal liberties or a legitimate way for innovative companies to protect their
intellectual property rights, you'll want to hear
what Attorney Michael L. Rosen, a Partner at the firm of Foley Hoag LLP says
about this contentious issue.
Rather, education plays a role with parallels to that of the book reviewer and critic, as they are all engaged in cultivating a discerning audience, eager to engage with
what is best
about such
intellectual properties.
What I found by examining a millennium and a half worth of history in the Latin West and Early Modern period — involving such learned figures as Jerome, Augustine, Benedict, Cassiodorus, Bede, Alcuin, Anselm, Hildegard of Bingen, Galileo, Newton, Locke — was that the learned
properties in question involved, if not consistently, a set of
properties and rights that could be said to be formative in later thinking
about intellectual property.
Speaker, «
What CIOs Need to Know
About the Legal Risks Associated with Open Source Software,» ExecSense Webinar:
Intellectual Property, August 2011
Another strength of this book is that it focuses on areas that have been given short shrift in previous works on Canadian copyright: users» rights (an area of increasing importance, since most public discourse
about copyright focuses on
what we can't do rather than
what we can); aboriginal approaches to
intellectual property rights (which emphasize the protection of the honour of clans, cultures, and nations over the rights of individual creators); digital rights management (and its spectacular failure to actually protect content); and public licensing systems (such as the Creative Commons licenses).
Let's start with doctrine: — Current copyright literature Next to Genie Tyburski and the wonderful Virtual Chase — Virtual Chase Legal Research guide:
Intellectual Property Law From Slaw's own Ted Tjaden, some Canadian links —
Intellectual Property Law — Canada Pausing only to suppress my occasional cynicism
about the length of time that Canada's policy - making on copyright has been going on, at least they have good resources explaining the process — Copyright Reform Process A few comparative links: the United Kingdom — Copyright on the UK Patent Office Site Next New Zealand — New Zealand Copyright Law How to do research on Australian copyright law —
Intellectual Property Research in Australia Now two important US sites: first the authorized version — The US Copyright Office Next, a wonderful site that reflects some of Larry Lessig «s thinking at Stanford — The Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center And finally, reflecting the fact that so much law in this area reflects not domestic policy - making, but hard - fought international consensus, an Index to
what the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a United Nations agency has accomplished — WIPO Index And to conclude with an American and a European take on international copyright, since I was just in Chicago, look at Irene Berkey's links — International
Intellectual Property and finally a European source (actually it's Swiss, but that's not obviousRobert Kraft, in his Diaries, quotes Stravinsky, la justice — c’est une invention suisse)-- Swiss Legal Research Center International IP Links, run by CMS von Erlach Henrici And finally, a nice and quirky piece on the oddities of copyright called — Digital Copyright & Copywrong by Peter Jacso.
yro.slashdot.org - Leaders of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee said on Tuesday they were concerned
about what they described as China's efforts to gain access to sensitive U.S. technologies and
intellectual property through Chinese companies with government ties.