What changes in our society have brought about this change?
Not exact matches
«As technology jumps forward and people are
changing preferences we have to think long and hard about
what the public sector offers to people when it comes to money and how do we facilitate people living
in society getting access to money
in the forms and shapes they prefer them to be,» Skingsley said.
By advocating for policy
changes, the Council seeks to create an economic model
in which
what is good for business is good for the environment and
society.
What we do know today is that traditional methods of structured customer, buyer, and market research that are quantitative based can not address the social and cultural
changes taking place
in our business
society.
Here's
what our anti-statist libertarian purists say
in their most reasonable mode: We're going to have climate
change and few babies; those are examples of the collateral damage of a
society dedicated to individual liberty.
It means to do
what we can to influence the larger
society to
change in the direction called for by these principles.
The alternative position is to wrestle, as Christian thinkers, with the question:
What kinds of social, economic, and political
changes are required
in our own
society if the United States is to abandon its alliances with local oppressors
in Latin America?
I agree with not going trying to
change the world as
in change to people by telling them they are wrong and I am right (IF I have understood your point of view) but I guess I'm not so convinced when it comes to
society, and just accepting
what ever **** is
in there or anywhere.
It's still very much an uphill battle, but even the minuscule time period of the last 100 years has seen dramatic
changes in society's acceptance of more «modest» antisocial behaviors (racism, bigotry, bullying etc.)
What is now coined «Political Correctness» is really just the fine - tuning of previously - accepted social norms.
What is remarkable is the human capacity —
in spite of this intensive societal indoctrination — to perceive where justice demands
change, to discover that one's
society or one's peers are morally wanting.
That a
Society has both essential and accidental qualities thus enables it to be a type of entity which endures throughout
change as a «complete existence» with an ongoing historical development of its own: it remains
what it is essentially and yet
changes accidentally
in «reaction to
changing circumstances.»
This world of ours is a new world,
in which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of
society, the order of ideas, the very notions of
society and culture have
changed and will not return to
what they have been
in the past.
Maybe they just fight for a cause and can not see the picture of
what will
change in society.
What I propose
in the present analysis is to emphasize three major sets of forces to which the leadership of emerging universities and their constituencies were responding: first, those having to do with the demands of technological
society; second, those having to do with ideological conflicts; and third, those having to do with pluralism and related cultural
change.
«This world of ours is a new world,» wrote Robert Oppenheimer
in 1963, «
in which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of
society, the order of ideas, the very notions of
society and culture have
changed and will not return to
what they have been
in the past» (Saturday Review of Literature, June 29, 1963, p. 11).
From the history of the Pulaya conversion movement
in Travancore,
what emerges uppermost is the development of social consciousness of a community
in the various stages and
changes of
society in transition.
To understand
what is happening
in our
society and
what might be done to
change the direction
in which we are going is another important focus of inquiry.
In what ways does faith and our church practises need to be changed to take account of consumerism, and in what ways does faith need to stand apart and challenge the society in the name of the One who is supreme, and jealous for love of his peopl
In what ways does faith and our church practises need to be
changed to take account of consumerism, and
in what ways does faith need to stand apart and challenge the society in the name of the One who is supreme, and jealous for love of his peopl
in what ways does faith need to stand apart and challenge the
society in the name of the One who is supreme, and jealous for love of his peopl
in the name of the One who is supreme, and jealous for love of his people?
These developments have
changed not only the speed and way
in which we now communicate: they have also
changed the way our
societies are organised, how we relate to each other,
what we think is important, and how we think and expect our social institutions (including the church) to function.
But, we create our own laws, and they are often updated and
changed due to our
society, and culture and
what is happening
in the here and now.
In such societies, this picture of what it is to understand God tends to be best sustained in relatively small Christian communities that can retain a degree of communal identity in the midst of these social changes without moving to the margins of social turmoil and withdrawing from active participation in the reformist or revolutionary movements that cause the change
In such
societies, this picture of
what it is to understand God tends to be best sustained
in relatively small Christian communities that can retain a degree of communal identity in the midst of these social changes without moving to the margins of social turmoil and withdrawing from active participation in the reformist or revolutionary movements that cause the change
in relatively small Christian communities that can retain a degree of communal identity
in the midst of these social changes without moving to the margins of social turmoil and withdrawing from active participation in the reformist or revolutionary movements that cause the change
in the midst of these social
changes without moving to the margins of social turmoil and withdrawing from active participation
in the reformist or revolutionary movements that cause the change
in the reformist or revolutionary movements that cause the
changes.
Still, by putting together the similarities and the differences between various kinds of systems or organizations, we can gain better ideas of how a
society works and of
what must be done to
change it
in desirable ways.10
Such is the first, superficial impression: our schools, like our churches and our ministers, have no clear conception of
what they are doing but are carrying on traditional actions, making separate responses to various pressures exerted by churches and
society, contriving uneasy compromises among many values, engaging
in little quarrels symptomatic of undefined issues, trying to improve their work by adjusting minor parts of the academic machine or by
changing the specifications of the raw material to be treated.
I confess that I have become somewhat blasé about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work
in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers
in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains
in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens; understanding the nature of the rice grain and
what makes for good quality; our many efforts to
change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of
changing rural economies,
changing societies, and a
changing climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR
change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.
Just like the «dating broke men» article this concept of a «marriageable» partner (man or woman) based on earning potential illustrates the need for a
change in the definition of
what marriage really means
in modern capitalist
societies.
It is
change like
what is happening with baby courts that shows
society's increasing awareness of and confidence
in attachment science.
What's shocking is how much our political culture has changed in just 60 years — the producers of this film lived in a country that had just seen REAL despotism in the form of Nazi Germany and a military - ruled Japan (note the brownshirt - style uniforms, and also the lack of any of any depiction of their Soviet equivalents), and they pull few punches about what leads a society away from free
What's shocking is how much our political culture has
changed in just 60 years — the producers of this film lived
in a country that had just seen REAL despotism
in the form of Nazi Germany and a military - ruled Japan (note the brownshirt - style uniforms, and also the lack of any of any depiction of their Soviet equivalents), and they pull few punches about
what leads a society away from free
what leads a
society away from freedom.
What they're saying: «Issoufou has been under pressure from the opposition and civil
society to make
changes to the voters» roll; he may want to use the pretext of a destabilization plot to avoid making
changes that could be to his disadvantage
in the election,» Francois Conradie, a political analyst for South Africa - based NKC African Economics.
I don't have the time or
what to be a drifter - I entered politics because I want to make a real difference
in society and
in peoples» lives, therefore really making a
change.
Then there's the individual as the vector of social
change, the perception that
Society is immanent
in each individual action and can't simply be hypostasised as the State, imposed from above or evoked through fugitive concepts such as «public opinion» It's a view that's been quite strong since the late 1960s and is shared (the «desiring subject» for example) by
what remains of the libertarian part of the Left.
«Because of the
changing nature of the relationship between science and
society, there are increasing calls for scientists to become more engaged and to realize responsibilities beyond
what they do
in the lab,» Frankel said.
The researchers note that the study provides historical context for
what is happening today and
what may happen
in the future and demonstrates that there is need for further investigation into the effects of climate
change on modern
societies worldwide.
The risk assessment stems from the objective stated
in the 2015 Paris Agreement regarding climate
change that
society keep average global temperatures «well below» a 2 °C (3.6 °F) increase from
what they were before the Industrial Revolution.
To find out more about how the harassment came to light and
what could be
changed going forward to improve how these cases are handled, Clery spoke with «Joan Schmelz, chair of the American Astronomical
Society's... Committee on the Status of Women
in Astronomy for 6 years until she finished her second term
in August, [who] played a key role
in identifying victims of Marcy's activities and letting them know they were not alone.»
During the Biophysical
Society's 62nd Annual Meeting, held Feb. 17 - 21, 2018,
in San Francisco, California, Samuel H. Schneider, a graduate student
in Stanford University's Boxer Lab, will present the group's research studying
what happens when an enzyme is accelerating reaction and how an enzyme
changes over time making it resistant to antibiotics.
Arranged marriages have been a feature of Chinese
society for generations, but to
what extent has love and relationships
changed in China?
The full quote:» Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal
Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate
Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed
what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation
in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.
So they go around
in circles repeating reports [Climate
Change —
What we know and what we need to know 25 Aug 2002 Ref: 22/02 Royal Society meeting held on 12 and 13 December 20
What we know and
what we need to know 25 Aug 2002 Ref: 22/02 Royal Society meeting held on 12 and 13 December 20
what we need to know 25 Aug 2002 Ref: 22/02 Royal
Society meeting held on 12 and 13 December 2001:]
How much of that was tied to climate
change is
what scientists around the world tried to answer
in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological
Society's annual attribution
Between 2009 and 2017, the German research network BIOACID (Biological Impacts of Ocean Acidification) investigated how different marine species respond to ocean acidification, how these reactions impact the food web as well as material cycles and energy turnover
in the ocean, and
what consequences these
changes have for economy and
society.
How much of that was tied to climate
change is
what scientists around the world tried to answer
in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological
Society's annual attribution report, which was published Thursday.
Cally Carswell, a contributing editor at High Country News, won NASW's Science
in Society Award for science reporting for a local or regional market
in 2014 for this tale of dying trees
in New Mexico — and
what they tell us about the future impact of climate
change.
In today's
society where many women give birth and soon head right back to work, these brain
changes can create profound conflict when it comes to
what we often talk about as» work life balance.»
As
in the
changes we're seeing
in our global
society, one needs to keep an open mind to
what is good and progressive
change.
What frustrates me though, as a girl, is that even though
society's attitude to sex has
changed so much
in the past two or three years alone, the attitude to women and sex hasn't
changed at all.
USA TODAY - Jan 23 -
In his new book, Love in the Time of Algorithms: What Technology Does to Meeting and Mating, writer Dan Slater argues that online dating has changed society profoundl
In his new book, Love
in the Time of Algorithms: What Technology Does to Meeting and Mating, writer Dan Slater argues that online dating has changed society profoundl
in the Time of Algorithms:
What Technology Does to Meeting and Mating, writer Dan Slater argues that online dating has
changed society profoundly.
What is interesting about this industry is not only its rapid growth
in a conservative
society that frowns upon courting more than one person at a time, but also its potential to
change the social norms that are part of dating both online and offline.
Life here began
in Old Town, with its medieval roots;
society was very different back when this part of town was still fresh faced and spry, though some of the old inns still stand if you feel like sampling a date from the heady and seductive Dark Ages... Then take a stroll through New Town, dripping
in Georgian decadence; here, you will be reminded that once upon a time the dating scene was a raucous, dangerous place, full of lust and lewdness... Okay, perhaps not all that much has
changed, but the point we are trying to make is that Edinburgh's dating scene has shifted across the centuries to become
what it is today — fairly sedate compared with the city's tumultuous past, but no less magical or intoxicating.
So much has
changed since the 1980s, both on TV and
in society itself, that
what returns to our screens may not be Directed by Stanley Tucci.
What changes should be made to protect our current
society from ending up like the characters
in this film who are forced to flee from Earth?