Sentences with phrase «what do we as a couple»

Sit down, and think long and hard about what you did as a couple when you were dating, and when you first got married.

What do we as a couple want out of life?

Not exact matches

Having a conversation about what you want if things don't work out as planned often helps couples have a more reasonable discussion when divorce hits.

So, you've coupled what you want them to do, with the three things you want them to know, and when you add in the overall feeling — let's say, motivated — you'll know what kind of tone you want to use as well.

We can't continue to do this... KERNEN: Are you leaning towards staying in or would you really go out of the... PRESIDENT TRUMP: I've always said during the campaign and as you noticed and as you've actually said a couple of times, which I've always appreciated, I have fulfilled a lot of what I've said.

And I've said I was interviewed by a couple of folks in the break and I said y ’ know as I'm listening to you today I'm quite confident that you truly are doing good, you believe in what you're doing, 2.2 billion people are using your platform.»

The problem with most link builders is they get a couple of keywords and then go out trying to get all their links with those keywords in, from do follow sites, as that is what they have been told to do.

After having been in a couple relationships with people whose second (or third) language is English, and knowing what I do now, I have a lot of empathy for what people are going through as they adjust to new words, new cultures, and new everything.

I had noticed that a couple of people had commented earlier regarding the OP, so that's what I did, as well as posting something personal having to do with the change of topic to participate in the conversation and, hopefully, help with the healing going on here in some way.

But from what I've read over the last couple of years, using «prophecy» as a proof that the Bible is true doesn't work too well.

In response, we believe in building strong marriages with our spouses and children as we start our own families, but wonder what this has to do with fighting against equal protection for gay couples.

Over the past couple years I have been very encouraged by the fact that many church leaders see orphan care not as a missional add - on but as a vital aspect of what the church is to be and do missionally.

Persons of the same sex can not marry because they can not do what married couples can, i.e., consummate their union by a bodily act in which they become the common subjects of an act that, precisely as human behavior, is eminently fit both for the communication of spousal love and for the generation of new human life.

Nothing you wrote there has anything to do with the loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it to be normal today, which is what this subject is about.

I pretty much agreed with most of what you have said and i think that the sinners prayer has been misused as a get out of Jail free card.A couple of things that people miss is that God is in charge.As soon as you offer yourself to God and accept Jesus Chris the holy spirit has liberty to work on you.Because he loves us he will discipline us so that we do repent of our sins.The downside of living a walk like that you are a hypocrite until you admit your sinfulness the holy spirit can not help us because of our pride.The second part was you talking about disciplining the flesh personally you cant discipline that which is corrupt our hearts are deceitfully wicked we need new hearts no amount of effort on our part will transform our hearts that is the work of the holy spirit he changes our hearts so that we no longer desire to sin we would rather serve the Lord with all our hearts instead.brentnz

But what do many couples say as the reason for why they divorce?

Having lived through a few of these, as well as inheriting a couple of them, I understand what it's like to have people hate me just for showing up, to preach to people who spent six days every week telling other people what to do, and to people who just assumed that their version of gossip, slander, personal and family attacks, and pettiness was «normal.»

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

Jewish values won't accept sodomite couples raising children as parents, Jewish values will always keep what God has taught to be done; Jewish values go hand by hand with moral, with integrity, dignity, and solid principles, all of them given by God.

It will require us to affirm same - sex couples as couples, pairs that rightfully and without any shame or legal disability do what married couples do: have sex, form households, have and raise children.

What might qualify any claim as to the aesthetic character of Wieman's model was his concern to distinguish «organization» from «coordination,» coupled with his specification that «Coordination means harmony, but... organization does not» (JPPS14: 539).

fishon — I'm curious as to what you would do if, when eventually you do speak to that couple about them living together, they say they have a different view on what the Bible teaches (either on sex outside of marriage or the definition of marriage — i.e.: not requiring a civil / legal marriage).

fishon — If that couple doesn't see what they are doing as «sexual immorality» then they will not hear those scriptures as being about them.

And we are much, much better at it now, especially over the last couple years as we've looked back and realized what we'd been doing, what I'd been doing, and worked on getting better.

Really appreciate this budget food section as a student can not afford to cook many of the dishes despite them looking incredibly appetising and while a lot of blogs will do a post with a couple tips for eating healthy within a budget this seems pretty unique — its great to see a practical application of them in recipes and on a recurring basis — if this was any indication of what's in store then i'm super excited!

17 Recovery Goals for 2017 I don't have a resolution for the new year, per se, as I'm continuing what I've been working on for the last couple years.

What a great idea to challenge yourself with «Meatless Mondays» — especially to do it as a couple.

Alternatively, if you have no way of processing it, do what I did: chop the onions as finely as you can along with a couple teaspoons of the light oil, which will help making things creamy.

What I do is remove the pot from the stove, stir as I add the half the milk, keep stirring for a couple seconds, and then stir as I add the remaining milk.

A couple of years ago, when I ordered my first ever bag of Kelp Noodles online, I found myself completely clueless as to what to do with them.

Remember what happened couple seasons ago when Monreal was magically transformed to a CB in a matter of 2 pre season games, and as a result the stingy one didn't need to buy a CB.

I will admit i was one of the ones to want Klopp at Arsenal, though its not going as great as he wouldve hoped for, it takes time to adjust to the prem and i still believe after the summer when he gets a couple of his own players in, ones back from injury and a pre season after this wake up call of what it actually takes to make it in this League he will do very well at Liverpool.

This article I read on bleacherreport sums up what a fan who wants the club success would like to see from than onwards: - Beat Bayern and progress above our mental block - Make top four and possibly as good as last season finishing # 2 likely getting positive result in our 5 most difficult fixtures (Spurs, Man U, Man City, Everton, Liverpool) & taking back some lost points - Ensuring we finish above any team in London except Chelsea of course - Win FA Cup best chance of silverware - Win UCL long reach but beating Bayern could spur the team and maybe make them believe coupled with playing any team except Barca, Real & Atletico in the round after and could we do a Chelsea 2012.

Zlatan would be ideal for a couple years as I honestly do think that Welbz and Akpom can learn a lot from him in training, just watching how Zlatan uses his size advantage would teach them a massive difference to what they have seen with Giroud.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Something strikes me as very odd — we say Arsenal don't have tactics but did we not park the bus and beat Man city a couple of years ago — again we beat Chelsea in the FA cup final; we knew what Liverpool are all about.

I'm one of those who doesn't see Ryan as an elite QB, but I needed only to watch a couple of CIN games to quickly appreciate what we have in Ryan.

Mate move on... Walcott had a couple of decent crosses all game rest of time just a waste of a player... What makes me laugh is the talk of defences fearing his pace... They don't as he doesn't actually pose a goal threat which is what defenders really worry aboutWhat makes me laugh is the talk of defences fearing his pace... They don't as he doesn't actually pose a goal threat which is what defenders really worry aboutwhat defenders really worry about....

Basically, what you do with such academy players is bring in as many as you envisage may make it and behold a couple of them make it with a bit of luck.

i strongly believe we can win it, though caution and common sense is telling me to prepare for the worst... and to be frank with this AFC squad you never know what expect but if they choke under pressure like they are wont to do in the last couple of years then we should get Coca Cola to be our sponsor, cos we will be known as bottlers

They will press and score against most defences let alone a weak one like ours but they are vulnerable to speed... as we saw again today... So what does the fossil do puts in a couple of lightweight midfielders who are completely dominated... Wilshire left in no mans land with no support... Ozil and miki misplaced... Pea isolated... Equals no threat but lots of sideways passing... Did you watch the game or just high on wenger juice?

I think the only definite recent clue AW has given in recent weeks as to what he wants to do in the rest of the transfer market was when he said «one maybe two» are planned — can't remember exactly when that was but was before TV5 left, maybe couple of weeks ago now.

Arsenal Almunia 7 — Had little to do, but what he did do he did well Sagna 7 — Lost the ball a couple of times but reliable as ever Gallas 9 — Excellent game, this season will be an important one for the Frenchman and this was a great way to start it Clichy 7 — Didn't put a foot wrong Fabregas 9 — Wonderful performance capped with a brace (Ramsey) 7 — The Welsh Cesc is coming along nicely Vermaelen 9 — An assured debut that left me forgetting about the absence of Kolo Denilson 8 — Top notch display Song Billong 8 — Solid and measured Arshavin 8 — Kept going from the 1st to the final minute Van Persie 8 — No goals, but two assists and a hand in an other (Eduardo) 7 — Lethal finisher showed what he is all about in his cameo Bendtner 8 — Really impressed me and is continuing to improve every game (Eboue) 7 — Helped close out the gadid do he did well Sagna 7 — Lost the ball a couple of times but reliable as ever Gallas 9 — Excellent game, this season will be an important one for the Frenchman and this was a great way to start it Clichy 7 — Didn't put a foot wrong Fabregas 9 — Wonderful performance capped with a brace (Ramsey) 7 — The Welsh Cesc is coming along nicely Vermaelen 9 — An assured debut that left me forgetting about the absence of Kolo Denilson 8 — Top notch display Song Billong 8 — Solid and measured Arshavin 8 — Kept going from the 1st to the final minute Van Persie 8 — No goals, but two assists and a hand in an other (Eduardo) 7 — Lethal finisher showed what he is all about in his cameo Bendtner 8 — Really impressed me and is continuing to improve every game (Eboue) 7 — Helped close out the gadid well Sagna 7 — Lost the ball a couple of times but reliable as ever Gallas 9 — Excellent game, this season will be an important one for the Frenchman and this was a great way to start it Clichy 7 — Didn't put a foot wrong Fabregas 9 — Wonderful performance capped with a brace (Ramsey) 7 — The Welsh Cesc is coming along nicely Vermaelen 9 — An assured debut that left me forgetting about the absence of Kolo Denilson 8 — Top notch display Song Billong 8 — Solid and measured Arshavin 8 — Kept going from the 1st to the final minute Van Persie 8 — No goals, but two assists and a hand in an other (Eduardo) 7 — Lethal finisher showed what he is all about in his cameo Bendtner 8 — Really impressed me and is continuing to improve every game (Eboue) 7 — Helped close out the game.

To be honest, I thought for once that Wenger will see that coupled with the fans vocal revolt as a synergy to spur him to proper team reinforcement, like what mourinho is doing at Man United.

# 5M is what Kean reportedly has to spend in the summer, a couple of million to uncover eleven hidden gems — As virtually all of Blackburn's recognised starting eleven boast very little technical qualities, nor do they have the required levels of flair and charisma demand from a disillusioned board.

Only the two people as a couple need to know that, if they even want to... While I don't condone what happened, let's let them go in peace to pick up the pieces of their life.

So, of course, I spoke to the Rev. Todhunter, too Again, the full details of that conversation will be included in The New I Do, but here's a taste of what he's observed — couples that celebrate 50 or so years of marriage and see commitment as «staying together no matter what» have an entirely different marriage than those that see commitment as a chance for each to grow, with the loving support of the other.

And the Trumps» arrangement may even be more transparent than the couples who wed with all the faith and hope of having a loving, equal partnership only to be deceived later because hubs always knew he'd put his career above his wife's, or he knew he was gay but married anyway because it's what he thought he should do, or she's been hiding a huge amount of debt (as 1 in 5 of us do).

All of which means that before we tout the presumptive benefits of marriage for everyone, we should be willing to explore what's working for those who are happily living alternatively and whether what doesn't work for them is the actual arrangement or the societal expectation that committed couples marry and live together as well as the judgment they face if they don't follow the romantic script.

I simply do not want to get to know anyone as quite frankly what I want to learn in my life can not be found in a claustraphobic twosome where my entire energy is taken up maintaining or fighting for balance or to keep harmony, Why fight for basics in a couple that I do nt have to as a single person?