Sentences with phrase «what kind of pollution»

What kind of pollution are they talking about?

Not exact matches

But one of the things that I have been very impressed by here is a lot of the stories of hope; many folks have traveled a long way to share what they are doing on a very local level to help combat climate change, and that's everything from, kind of, rural electrification in Africa and India, you know, bringing light to people who are still using dung or coal for cooking and heating and dying from indoor air pollution to, you know, major renewable energy projects, say, here in Denmark where they now get 20 percent of their electricity from wind power.

I mean we kind of know what it means when, you know, you can say, «Well, we don't graze cattle» but what do you do about regional nitrogen solutions, what do you do about regional air pollution, what do you do about regional dust production?

Sure, night offers the kind of star gazing that you simply can not get in a place with more light pollution, such as Toronto, but what really makes this hallowed BC wunderkind shine is its views, and those are best enjoyed during daylight.

The continued circulation of the non-peer-reviewed draft can act as a kind of pollution of the scientific literature, as it is often unclear to the uninitiated what it means to be published in an EGU «Discussions» journal.

Sure industrialisation has increased the output of pollution of many kinds, however, what climate «science» can't prove is that that industrialisation has actually had any significant effect on the climate.

Consider the possibility that not just millions, but billions face disastrous consequences from the likes of (including but not limited to): Sandy (and other hybrid and out - of - season storms enhanced by the earth's circulatory eccentricities and warmer oceans); the drought in progress; wildfires; floods (just last week, Argentina had 16 inches of rain in 2 hours *); derechos; increased cold and snow in the north as the Arctic melts and cracks up, breaking up the Arctic circulation and sending cold out of what was previously largely a contained system, and losing its own consistent cold, seriously interfering with the Jet Stream, pollution of multiple kinds such as in China, the increase of algae and the like in our oceans as they heat, and food and water shortages.

What would be at issue is what kind of problem that pollutionWhat would be at issue is what kind of problem that pollutionwhat kind of problem that pollution is.

Should the climate negotiations try to cap CO2 pollution in the atmosphere at 550 parts per million (ppm), 450 ppm, or some other (hopefully lower) figure Or should we take an entirely different approach and try to cap temperature change itself, rather than CO2 pollution And what must we know about the kinds of impacts and instabilities that can be expected at any given level View Full Text»