What meaningful conclusions can we draw?
Not exact matches
That means that although it can give scientists a rough idea of
what the common ancestor to all living apes and humans would have looked like, drawing other
meaningful conclusions could be challenging.
The core panel
conclusion, of course, is that rich and developing nations are way behind on
what would need to be done to avoid substantial and largely irreversible (on
meaningful time scales) warming of the climate.
Given that you find this paper convincing, and that (from
what I can tell) the
conclusions are derived from Argo data — do you recommend that I just disregard the opinions of «skeptics» who discount Argo data as being
meaningful?
Not sure
what to think about the finding... but as to whether I find it surprising... I think that it isn't particularly surprising because in the end, the questions themselves aren't informative enough to draw truly
meaningful conclusions.
To make a
meaningful conclusion, you'll need to identify
what features and characteristics you need most, and
what you're willing to sacrifice instead.
I did some rough estimates and came to the
conclusion that it would take about 40 — 50 rental properties to generate,
what I considered to be «
meaningful passive income» (somewhere in the $ 150 — $ 200k a year range).