Sentences with phrase «whatever view we have»

Whatever view we have of the creation of the text, we know that human hands and hearts have been at work in its formation.
He did not summon synods in which he invited selected bishops to express with Parrhesia whatever views they had.
«And of course when it comes to a vote,» Davis said, «I would hope you show up and express whatever view you have relating to that.
Rooms are comfortably furnished whatever view you have chosen, but have an ocean view from a high floor if you can.
I moved quickly though the unthemed booths, with little to disturb whatever view I had of the present.
Whatever view one has of Brexit, the issue of reciprocity can not be ignored.
Remember, whatever the view you have (and / or the filter you've applied to get that view) will be the base of the optimization rule you create.

Not exact matches

Whatever your views of Ford, and whatever your views about the severity of his breach of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, you pretty much have to agree that Ford demonstrated a disappointing lack of leadership ethicWhatever your views of Ford, and whatever your views about the severity of his breach of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, you pretty much have to agree that Ford demonstrated a disappointing lack of leadership ethicwhatever your views about the severity of his breach of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, you pretty much have to agree that Ford demonstrated a disappointing lack of leadership ethics, here.
I've always been attracted to this industry because I viewed it as a means to achieve «financial freedom,» whatever the fuck that means.
My view all along has been that if the US had done the difficult thing (let the banks fail, let equity and debt holders face whatever came and only protected depositors) we would have seen real and organic recovery by now.
My guess is that whatever revelations are forthcoming from Mueller will fit a similar pattern — most people already have a negative view of Trump, so it's hard to move the needle too much more on public opinion, and the whole GOP has already wagered so heavily on the Trump experiment that they're not going to pull the plug regardless of what happened.
Whatever their own views about the wisdom of high prices and low yields, it might have made sense to buy anyway.
It's not about intelligent design, or whatever views he may have had.
The Christian Institute's Deputy Director Humphrey Dobson said: «Whatever your view of David Cameron's premiership it is saddening that he has chosen to highlight this deeply controversial issue as his legacy.
Other students of liberalism have held that its view of happiness is not only private but also preferential, i.e., that the nature of one's self - interest is solely a matter of preference, so that one's happiness is defined in whatever way one pleases.
Yet whatever other reasons we may have for adopting that view, this can not be a reason!
He is only following the cue given by secular culture, which has bombarded him since adolescence with the view that human fulfilment is tied to whatever form of sexual «satisfaction» comes naturally.
My own view on the spectrum is that she should be free to decide for whatever reason, although I would oppose most late - term abortions like most pro-choice supporters.
And it ought to be clear that to say, «God is the all,» means whatever one's view of the all implies, perhaps nothing definite whatever, for offhand we have no clear notion of the all.
As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....
Powerful lobbies such as the Pro Israel lobby, American Atheists and many others pay top dollar to have shills come to these forums, spread their agenda and copy whatever info they can get about the people who disagree with their point of view.
Whatever the primary index of race may be — skin color, religion, or nationality — this unscientific view of race presupposes certain inherited characteristics that all members of a given racial group have in common.
Above all, I was familiar with the traditional Christian view that held that since Christ's coming the distinction between Jew and gentile had lost whatever theological significance it may once have had.
But if this is an accurate accounting of Brightman's mature view of givenness, then he has added something significant to Hartshorne's view of this period, in that he has shown how not only God but we (and whatever sub-human persons there are) have a dipolar nature analogous to God's.
By the time I had graduated, the field had become «one that maintains its interest in literary texts but explores all forms of aesthetic speech and that views performance as an art and recognizes its communicative potential and function» There were three challenges to those of us graduating with doctoral degrees in this discipline: 1) to locate which performances within art and / or culture we would focus our attention on as scholars and performers; 2) to interpret the core concepts generating from the cultural turn in our discipline to other studies of culture and human communication and 3) to develop «performance - centered» methods of research and instruction in whatever parts of the university we found ourselves.
The purpose of this pledge is to clarify the difference between the Christian view of marriage and the government view, which the Supreme Court has redefined so that everyone can use it to express their identities, whatever those identities might be.
I would imagine the Messiah would appear to anybody as whatever they needed him to appear as: looking different to anybody that viewed him.
Often there has been an immoral transaction in view, as in the Victorian hymn, «Whatever Lord we give to thee!
There are some who would like us to be a «bible - believing» church, while there are others who are searching for a way to be a believer without having to embrace the plenary - verbal view of inspiration or whatever.
I have been trying to take every opportunity I can to say how much I love the Church and that, for me, making this announcement is not damning the Church, it is simply saying that we need to make it acceptable for people to talk about this, whatever their views are.
Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it's very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.
Millions of women have viewed sonograms of their babies kicking, sucking their thumbs, and turning somersaults; whatever these little ones are, they are busily alive.
Lipstadt insists, wisely, that no scholar or survivor should engage deniers in debates or other public forums, since this would only give the impression that, whatever the final judgment, Holocaust denial represents a legitimate point of view.
Not because society's views have changed, but because, for instance, women 2000 or 3000 years ago were just as much people as they are today, completely independent of whatever people decide in Switzerland.
Whatever views one might hold on that distinct question, in this case the Council has engaged in an obvious violation of the right to the free exercise of religion.
As we have seen, the primitive Christians, whatever Jesus» own view, confidently expected within their own generation the fulfillment of the hopes of the prophets and apocalyptists and were sure that Jesus would shortly come again in glorious power to judge the world and to redeem the contrite.
Statements about God, creation, Christ and the like no longer have any defining place in the religious life, though individuals may hold whatever such views they choose.
Were we writing the story of the mind from the purely natural - history point of view, with no religious interest whatever, we should still have to write down man's liability to sudden and complete conversion as one of his most curious peculiarities.
By «validity claims,» Habermas has in view presumptions that already reside in any communicative act whatever and that we must be prepared to defend under questioning by others.
There is an obvious external comparison which could be drawn here with the evolutionary cosmology of C. S. Pence, in which the laws of nature are described as having evolved, as subject to change, and as having more the characteristic of habit.13 However, there is no evidence whatever that Whitehead knew of Peirce's views or was in any way influenced by them.14
The strengthened version is presupposed by the basic idea at work in the standard view of omnipotence, viz., that if A is omnipotent, A has power sufficient to overpower whatever effort B may make to determine its own activities for itself.
lmao... Hawaii, there's not a blessed thing in any of your writings or thoughts I need to address really, your a self indulgent clueless individual who for whatever reason is mad at anyone who has a Christian view of life.
If Coover is to be categorized philosophically (and this is perhaps appropriate given his former employment as a professor of philosophy), he would better fit in the positivistic tradition that views as nonsensical whatever is incapable of verification.
Have whatever belief you want, company founders, but as patrons just realize you may influence some people's choices of where they spend their hard - earned cash when you flaunt your narrow views.
However, the religious being less smart than a teenager from Kansas and her little Scottie (or whatever kind of dog Todo was) have their eyes clenched tightly shut, and refuse to look behind the curtain because they've built their world - views around the existence of OZ, the great, and mighty and terrible.
Marie Hendrickz, official of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said that in view of the growing popularity of animal rights movements, the church needs to ask itself to what extent Christ's dictum, «Do to others whatever you would have them do to you,» can be applied to the animal world.
So profound were the changes involved in this, that, from the point of view of the New Testament believer, Paul was justified in writing to his converts, whatever their previous religious allegiance might have been, «Now that ye have come to know God, or rather to be known by God.»
Plainly, Leavis took a dim view of whatever future the scientific culture had in its bones.
Critical Zionist thinkers, however, have maintained that the official Zionist movement in effect adopted Jabotinsky's views when it decided in 1942 to go all out for a Jewish national state to be established and maintained against all opponents by whatever means were necessary.
People have a right to name their child whatever they want and shouldn't be restricted by someone elses religious views.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z