Not exact matches
In particular, he kept seeing the baffling personal injustice involved
when «the wicked doth compass about the righteous,» and, even
when he thought of the nation's collective problem, his solution was not so much to blame present social tragedy on antecedent social sin as to believe that
justice, now denied, would come in time — «Though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not
delay.»
He said, «Two years ago
when we filed this lawsuit I invoked one of my personal heroes Martin Luther King, Jr. who said: «
justice too long
delayed is
justice denied».
It is clear that he, and all the other luke - warmers should no longer be considered serious scientists - their opinions count for nothing except to be placed on the scales
when justice is served to those who have helped
delay climate change action for so long.
This question is designed to expose the ethical duty entailed by procedural
justice to obtain consensus from those who will be harmed by any
delay in taking action on the basis of uncertainty
when delay will likely increase the harms to those most vulnerable to the dangerous behavior.
This question is designed to expose the ethical duty entailed by procedural
justice to obtain consensus about waiting until uncertainties are resolved before taking action from those who will be harmed by any
delay in taking action on the basis of uncertainty
when delay will most likely increase the harms to those who are most vulnerable.
Delay in court or tribunal proceedings has been an issue at least since the Magna Carta of 1215,
when King John promised that «to no man will we sell, to no man deny, or
delay right or
justice».
We meant what we said,
when we described in R. v. Jordan last year, «a culture of complacency towards
delay in the criminal
justice system.»
When the Supreme Court of Canada describes in R v. Jordan our
justice system as «a culture of
delay and complacency,» you know you have a problem.
But the high court said there is no going back to a time
when the criminal
justice system made excuses for unreasonable
delays.
When the Supreme Court said trial judges should do their part to reduce
delay in the
justice system, it wasn't suggesting what Justice Richard Blouin did in a 2017 criminal case, an appeal court has
justice system, it wasn't suggesting what
Justice Richard Blouin did in a 2017 criminal case, an appeal court has
Justice Richard Blouin did in a 2017 criminal case, an appeal court has ruled.
At a time
when we are constantly reminded that access to
justice is hindered by costly procedures and long
delays, and that we should find ways to streamline the legal process, it seems incongruous to actually draft dispositions that allow for longer
delays and higher costs at one party's behest.