Sentences with phrase «when choosing points»

When choosing points for a stay, Explorists will receive a 20 % point bonus on the Base Points earned on the Eligible Rate and Eligible Incidental Charges incurred during such stay.

Not exact matches

When I look back on the turning points in my business, I can usually pin point a time where I chose to just show up.

The first point is that even when employers choose to purchase machines instead of hiring employees, that needn't be a bad thing socially, nor bad for labour as a group.

But introverted thinkers make their best contributions when they've had time to process relevant data and space to choose words carefully and share thoughtful conclusions,» Cullinan points out.

When you compare these data points, it's difficult to choose a clear winner among the top three law schools.

You'll note the government chose 2001, after the giant tech bubble of the late 1990s had imploded, as its starting point, thereby overlooking a period when the biggest companies in the land were all tech firms.

Sandicor asked for another key term — that the MLS's 8,000 or so active residential listings not be automatically included in the feed, but only when brokers expressly chose to opt in — but that was not a point of contention with Zillow, Ewing said.

Nellie brings up a great point, the business entity you choose matters to many lenders, but it doesn't mean you won't need to provide a personal guarantee when your small business applies for a loan.

When you want to redeem the points you have earned, there are a few different ways to choose.

So with this learning, going forward, when Olive Garden chooses to feature an approachable price point in their promotion, the broader platform idea that we will communicate to guests will focus more single - mindedly on affordability.

In addition, when Olive Garden chooses to feature a price point in their promotion, that platform idea that the promotion is based on will be more single - mindedly focused on affordability than they were in fiscal 2012.

We're almost at a point in our lives that we can choose when to work, if we want to work.

For a bank to put out rates a couple of points over prime, their profit margin is still very good, and when you are the lowest cost in your industry you can pick and choose who and where you put your dollars.

The point is we are probably now 2 generations into rules based advice and quadrature optimization and it already overtaking this PC product so choosing a guesstimated simple portfolio when you can have an optimized slightly more complex kind of misses the power we now have.

So, what is the point of any teaching when there are millions of different interpretations and you just pick and choose what you like?

The source is religion,... the Bible pointed out that Jews were the chosen people, and obviously when someone has that sort of ego, people on the outside are going to despise it,... in this case it was Christianity, Catholicism (same as Christianity), Islam, etc who felt they were the chosen people and so the hatred began.

Sorry, a bit snarky, but my point is that God still chooses a really brutal and violent method of protection when other options would seem to be available.

A person is never going to fully agree theologically, in every way, with any community of believers however, when choosing a community for myself and my family to be a part of, I certainly looked for the church which had the most points of agreement.

When someone is accused of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their case in the strongest possible way.

«She said that we'd come to the point in our science topic [evolution] when we had to choose between believing the science and believing in God.»

No one would consider Washington theocratic, yet Honey chooses to use a similar statement from a known pariah to make her point when the Father of our Country said basically the same thing.

We chose to confront him about what he did to our son and we have been accused of finger pointed when we have our own sin.

My point is that when a homosexual couple wants an offspring they will try only one way that is copulation the way God planed if not from their own loins then from a third party, Adoption, IVF, this is how they choose.

The fact that this false prophet idiot keeps getting followers really astounds me.he picks and chooses which scripture supports his theories like its a buffet restaurant, and he seems to be forgetting some pretty key points that the bible mentions too.Dare I mention that the bible doesn't even mention WHEN in the tribulation the so called rapture occurs?Some believe before, some during and some after..

They say that religious people are intolerant of other beliefs and that may be so to a point, on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.

But while Abraham was chosen at a point in time, Paul goes on in verse 4 to state when Jesus Christ was chosen.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

When put to them in this way, the interviewees begin to acknowledge that perhaps the questioner has a point - perhaps saying that a woman has a right to choose isthe same as saying that the Holocaust was not morally wrong.

At the point where anyone of religious faith would then attribute the goodness and power of creation to an omnipotent and loving God, Frank chooses to step back from that conclusion, and just revel in «the mystery», and bemoan its sudden passing when we die.

Even when lucrative jobs loom, we choose to live on less, to be home more, to not vacation, to not have the latest gadgets or a flat - screen TV or a new car with windows that work (sore point in the summer, you see).

I know of people who have chosen this lifestyle, and when I ask them point blank if they know its wrong, they always say Yes.

The same point is made when Pope's «The Rape of the Lock» is shown to embody a «total situation,» not choosing between convention and economic or biological necessity, but recognizing both the seriousness and the triviality of the rape.

I chose the clip above because it highlights how our culture glorifies the act of being offended, and it illustrates Dark's point in Chapter Three that we tend to be «selective fundamentalists,» especially when it comes to what offends us.

He chooses this tome when a significant body of literature has for over a century pointed to the Reformation as the Rubicon of secularization, beginning with Max Weber's seminal The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism in 1905.

??? Posters form a pattern of behaviour, when some get to the point they do not have a rebuttal they choose to leave the discussion or start a new thread.

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

One thing to remember is when choosing food that you'll be eating raw, consider buying organic spray free produce otherwise it kind of negates the whole point.

To highlight this point, my herbal nutritionist who has a sensitivity to wheat and gluten (not Celiac's disease, just to be clear) will, when eating out, choose the «normal» bread over the gluten - free version due to the highly processed nature of these alternatives.

That was my main point, just acknowledging and being aware of the history of that word and its impact, and taking that into account when choosing how to describe something in the future.

No point being mad at them when the person to be mad at is whoever decided a non-wrestler should be chosen to begin witrh.

Recruited by Robinson four years ago when Robinson was an assistant at Kansas, Greer instead chose Florida State, where he was hyped as the heir apparent to point guard Charlie Ward.

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

«You eventually reach a point in your career when it becomes time to come to a halt and choose a new direction, that point will come after the Euros.»

the only point you have chosen to ignore is Mr. Wenger's comic surprises and shockers especially when it times to squad selections and timing of substitutions.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Once Terry L. kicked 13 extra points in a college football game, his being the educated toe on the day in 1968 when Houston chose to run it up against Tulsa 100 - 6.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

Others are of course also free to use emphasis — as we all do in actual speech when making a point — but few choose to do so.

If they manage neither, it will be difficult to argue this side hasn't been weakened — and Klopp's stubbornness, which has gotten him into trouble in the past, will be pointed to as a cause given he will be the one who chose to sanction the Coutinho sale when the club had previously shown the will to hold on to him.

Just four points separate them in the Barclay's Premier League, so one expects there won't be a great deal to choose between them come full - time at The Hawthorns − as was the case when they clashed at this very ground precisely two weeks ago, a contest that was won 2 - 1 by the visiting Canaries.