Sentences with phrase «when debates»

Something for Parliament to deliberate upon when it debates Grayling's proposed reforms for judicial review: see my recent post.

But when debates are rehearsed simply for debate's sake, and when dogma, rather than reason, drives the conversation, it's necessary to re-examine the terms of our conflicts and the assumptions upon which they rest — such as the support of so many environmentalists for renewables over a zero - carbon energy source like nuclear, or the deep - seated resistance to biotechnology and machines when it comes to food production.

The irony of public debates to decide matters of science is that while yes, democracies work best when debates are public, issues of science aren't democratic.

Asian Americans, though hardly a homogenous group or evenly represented in the art world, frequently find themselves awash in racial nuance when debates turn black - and - white.

When all debates are said and done, it's great to see this kind of excitement surround so many of the world's wonderful destinations.

You know this when their debates about education reform are centered around teacher rights, and not student rights.

So I want you to enjoy your time in Glasgow and when the debates are over and the speeches have finished I want you to join me in getting back out there and telling everyone this: we are the party of fairness; we are the party of freedom; and, yes, we are the party of jobs.

When debates go on for several hours, MPs often pop in and out as they have other business going on at the same time.

When debates on a motion for the adjournment take place other than after the Moment of Interruption, the order of speakers is similar to that for a debate on a substantive motion.

When those debates happen it could be explosive.

«When the debates are over and the speeches have finished I want you to join me in getting back out there and telling everyone this: We are the party of fairness.

what i don't like is when these debates resort to name calling, which they have more often than not.

We can and should debate theology and doctrine, but we must never think that we are the infallible interpreters of Scripture and determiners of people's destiny, and should also remember that doctrine, as important as it is, becomes evil when debates and discussions about theology keep us from living out the loving gospel in tangible ways to a hurting and dying world.

Since, even now, when debates about the fact of global warming is largely over, no nation is considering taking the really drastic actions that might significantly reduce the catastrophes that lie ahead, it seems that we are all too likely to experience judgment for our collective sins.

So when debates about embryo freezing, manipulation, or killing arise, moral philosophers and theologians have rich resources for identifying the wrongs involved.

At a time when debate about a potential outer harbour project south of Perth is building momentum, a look at the history of development in Kwinana's industrial zone provides an illustration of the impact of government intervention in the state's economy, for better or worse.

Here are three major differences that emerge when the debate on taxing high earners is adapted to the Canadian context.

Similar criticisms were levied at the U.S. government in the 1940s, when the debate was over whether billions should be spent on building a national interstate highway system.

The Federal Communications Commission has done what no one, including apparently chairman Tom Wheeler, once thought possible when the debate over net neutrality erupted early last year.

When debating between a 30 - year or 15 - year mortgage, it's best to consider your own unique situation and the factors that are important to you.

Makes you wonder how loving a christian really is when they debate on the side of «pro-slavery»»

Just bring FACTS and stay on subject when you debate.

When we debate «truth» in ANY situation, the real truth is missed.

It is in this context that academic freedom finds meaning — it supports a plurality of voices and traditions (past and present) when debating what vision of human life maximizes flourishing, which is the ongoing project of any society that seeks to perpetuate itself.

She said: «Partly because of illiteracy [and] partly because of those who have a very different agenda, we may be moving into a period when debate is shutdown - where you can't have an honest debate and agree to differ.»

When debating John Lennox regarding this very issue you raised, John lennox asked Richard Dawkins, «I presume you have faith in your wife, is there any evidence for that?»

We do it well enough when we debate nuclear weapons, environmental degradation, world hunger or totalitarianism.

So when the debate moderator asks him what his approach to ending the deficit is, we can flip to another channel, make a sandwich or whatever.

Typicaly «believer» behavior when the debate starts to be tough, «most» tend to resort to their «fall - back» position... the bible.

The Koran provides me the best evidence when debating muslim appeasers / apologists.

You, and many others, emphasize it as a «public declaration» and (when debating with those who believe contrariwise) «nothing more».

It's a little silly that the poster picture for this article about gun control shows a plain ol' pistol, when the debate (currently) is about military - style assault weapons.

When debate about an artist's merit no longer seems to have any point, one is left either with an icon of culture, too sacred to enjoy, or with a target of satire, brought down to our more humdrum level by a vaudeville lampooning of the unapproachable totem, as when graffiti artists paint a moustache on reproductions of the Mona Lisa.

«The Qur «an commands us Muslims to, «be considerate when you debate with the People of the Book» - i.e., Jews and Christians [chapter 29, verse 46].

When debating Calvinists in person or online, there are 3 tactics they often use to defend their Calvinistic ideas, and all 3 lack grace.

So when we debate an «issue» and forget that it is backed by people — imperfect, wounded, beloved people on both sides — we dehumanize each other.

But when we debate, we should do it assuming the best about one another, taking our thumbs off the scale, honoring our shared commitment to Christ.

When debating, it is easy to remain obscure and appear to understand the issue.

As a curative, he searches for common narratives and themes that those with religious views can employ when debating RGTs.

Might the same be the happy fate of John Carroll and the Carroll Church when the debate over the Dolan Project runs its course?

You'll see it when they debate.

Oh — yeah I'm the same way on the caps of god (s), Boston — I've just had to be careful when debating someone like Chad.

It is that time of the year where we all say «what if» when we debate the crashing the race for the EPL.

All par for the course when debating such a passionate subject.

It does seem to me that when a debate is reduced to someone saying «don't judge me» or «you think I'm a bad mom», it's in large part because they * aren't * certain they made the right choice.

Here are just a few things to consider when debating on whether or not you want to breastfeed.

As I've often said on TLT, when we debate the minutiae of school food reform it's easy to forget that, for some children, school food is the only food they get in the course of a day.

I suspect when the debate begins in Parliament the question that will be asked is to tell exactly why the 1.8 billion is needed.

It is said that «when the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser».

When debating the introduction of criminal sanctions, James Brokenshire, the then immigration minister, insisted that the Home Office evaluation found no hard evidence of discrimination.