Sentences with phrase «when explaining to others»

When explaining to others who ask about our family's personal slant toward eating as plant - based as possible, my husband often says, «it's a preference, not a religion.»

Not exact matches

«When [Michel and I] decided to get married, we understood: We're not promising to love each other forever, because you can't do that, but we are promising to work on whatever problems come up,» she explained to Glamour magazine in 2014.

«They contain nine essential nutrients; have the highest rate of proteins when compared to other nuts; have the highest rate of fiber (3.5 g per 23 pieces) when compared to other nuts; are rich in Vitamin E (23 pieces provide 35 % of the daily value of Vitamin E); and contain monounsaturated fats that help increase HDL levels,» explains Nicole Maftoum, a Lebanese clinical dietitian.

It always tickles me when a spokesman explains to reporters that a company experiencing delays or other problems in delivering a product or service is «a victim of its own success» — as though it had undergone something rare and freakish.

«When our customers see we do add value to their operations and reduce costs or drive efficiencies, it is a relatively easy sell to offer that client additional services in other areas of their business,» explains Wills.

In an early staff meeting, when we first decided to start this project, I explained to the team that we wanted to build our tribe, because we truly believed that the world of books was falling behind the overall virtualization that publishing and other industries were going through.

David Kennedy, a former Marine intelligence specialist, explains what he thinks would be the most devastating attack on the country and why it's crucial to keep up with other countries when it comes to our cyber capabilities.

When pressed on the details of how the product works, Putnam declined to explain other than to say the device is a full - length mirror with an LCD display, surround - sound speakers, camera, and a microphone.

Author Ryan Holiday explains where millennials, and lots of other people, get it wrong when it comes to finding yourself.

Classmate James Oliver recalls a conversation in the dorm soon after, when Zuckerberg — he and others still refer to him as «Zuck» — explained that he had worked to launch Facebook quickly to show up a Harvard administrator who had said a university - wide online directory would take two years to create.

And as Harvard psychologist Chris Argyris explains, when something doesn't go the way we want or expect, it's rare to question the faulty assumptions that got us there — and to invite others to do the same.

When drivers activate Autopilot, the acknowledgment box explains, among other things, that Autopilot «is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times,» and that «you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle» while using it.

As Vox's German Lopez explains, there's no good research that supports this theory, particularly when it comes to arming teachers or others in schools:

Interestingly, Lee explained how it was a pragmatic decision for Litecoin to use a different algorithm to Bitcoin, as he had seen the significant problems other altcoins had faced when their miners were required to compete with Bitcoin's miners.

As he himself explained, when he didn't question some aspect of the status quo, more often than not it was because he hadn't yet had a chance to noodle around with other options.

How can we go to a town hall anywhere in Canada and explain this choice to Canadians when there are so many other priorities that are pressing on hard - pressed Canadian families?

Twelve of the rifles the Las Vegas gunman, Stephen Paddock, had in a high - rise hotel suite when he opened fire on a crowd on Sunday were outfitted with «bump stocks,» devices that allow a semiautomatic rifle to fire hundreds of rounds per minute, which may explain how he was able to shoot so quickly, killing 58 people and wounding hundreds of others.

In a real league game I wouldn't try to play with the guys either, because I know dang well that they would want to hold back when it came to some of the tackling and scrumming (it'd take me a whole other paragraph to explain what this is).

Why do you find it necessary to attack others and call them names when they ask you to explain your belief?

The theist, on the other hand, it quite smugly certain that he has all teh answers to life, the universe and everything explained neatly in a single book and reacts with hostility and derision when anyone refutes the contents of said book.

I wish to add one other favourite expression I have been confronted with when explaining my «deviant» non Calvinistic understanding of predestination — Armenian heretic.

History shows us that people often make up explanations involving God or other supernatural forces to explain things when they have no other explanation.

The more I have studied the bible, and believe me I have spent years studying it and other religious books, the more I see this as a hangover from primitive days when our ancestors had no scientific knowledge and had to imagine gods to explain things.

When you try to explain one or two of them to show that you are aware of these passages but have a different understanding, they will focus on all the other passages they quoted which you did not explain.

(I apologize to those that dislike metaphors, but I almost can't communicate if I don't get to use them, and as insufficient as they at times are, they are very close to the language of what I believe, because you can't really explain or define someone into believing... you can only live out your beliefs in a way that you share with others, and when given the opportunity shine a light, or point a direction, or walk along with someone for a bit).

Moreover, the problem of primitive Christianity is not to account for early Christian messianism — for there was enough of that element in ancient Judaism, after the second century before Christ — but to explain why Christianity survived when other messianic movements came to nothing and disappeared.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

The fact that Matthew and Luke use these sayings in other connections, and then repeat them when following Mark, together with the fact of the sometimes divergent form of the sayings in Mark, seems best to be explained by the hypothesis that Mark also is drawing from the common stock — either the collection Q or its equivalent in some common cycle of «sayings of the Lord.»

When the time is right, when both of you are relaxed and not distracted, ask each other to explain when you feel most eager to head to When the time is right, when both of you are relaxed and not distracted, ask each other to explain when you feel most eager to head to when both of you are relaxed and not distracted, ask each other to explain when you feel most eager to head to when you feel most eager to head to bed.

Furthermore, today children are more likely than people of any other age group to live in poverty, and, as Mintz explains in such excellent detail, it has always been true that when children live in poverty both their physical and social needs are apt to go unmet.

I don't know what kind of forms or what information women have when they go to get an abortion, but maybe the abortion clinic could explain other options that they have and make sure they are educated.

Millions upon millions of years old makes since when you have to explain how a fish, bird, dog, monkey, all other living species and humans are all so different now.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

Or he may ask me to explain why I care when others do not, and just how Jesus fits into that.

At best Braine shows thathuman beings have an existence that transcends the body because they have language, but he does not show how or why only human beings and not other higher animals possess transcendence when they are all alike psycho - physical beings, because animals are not to be explained mechanistically either.

We could even go before the time of Christ and go back, for example, to Nehemiah 8, and see that when Ezra wants to teach the people the Word of God, he gathers the people, and then he and several other Levites took turns reading from Scripture and explaining what it meant.

When the two despondent disciples on the road to Emmaus expressed to the stranger their bewilderment that such a powerful prophet as Jesus should have been condemned to death and be crucified, we are told that the risen Christ «began with Moses and all the prophets, and explained to them the passages which referred to himself in every part of the scriptures».6 The story implies that the Scriptures, when properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to us?&raWhen the two despondent disciples on the road to Emmaus expressed to the stranger their bewilderment that such a powerful prophet as Jesus should have been condemned to death and be crucified, we are told that the risen Christ «began with Moses and all the prophets, and explained to them the passages which referred to himself in every part of the scriptures».6 The story implies that the Scriptures, when properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to us?&rawhen properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to us?&raWhen finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to us?»

There strong policy against child abusers explains why it is very rare that such abuse occurs in the Christian Congregation when compared to other groups.

And his teaching about judging in the sermon of the mount is spelling out, what Jeremy explains here in an existential form (and so does his words about giving the other cheek, walking the second mile and so on — he explains here what should mean to hold high the law of god, and what is this other, then do the opposite what the Israelite did, when they conquered Canaan?

Gill Sewell explained: «When you see a lot of despair and darkness in the world, it's lovely to have a space where you can go and be quiet, still and reflective alongside other people who are also seeking peace and goodness in the world.»

That's why I am encouraged when I see leaders like Lee Grady speaking up on some of the dangers of such heretical and carnal expressions — Grady and others do so not as professional critics, but rather as respected insiders to the movement, and they explain the challenges well.

> I just don't see why they have to be miracles when they can be otherwise explained There is no other explanation in the case of Paul's conversion and 2 visions except to change the story which you can not do or discount the entire story.

When someone thinks their beliefs give them the right to control how others live their lives, they should not be offended when I demand that they be able to rationally and logically explain their beliWhen someone thinks their beliefs give them the right to control how others live their lives, they should not be offended when I demand that they be able to rationally and logically explain their beliwhen I demand that they be able to rationally and logically explain their beliefs.

He might have offended his critics less if he had more often used the analogy he gave James G. Blaine when explaining his course on Reconstruction: â $ ˜The pilots on our Western rivers steer from point to point as they call itâ $» setting the course of the boat no further than they can see; and that is all I propose to myself in this great problem.â $ ™ â $ œBoth statements suggest Lincolnâ $ ™ s reluctance to take the initiative and make bold plans; he preferred to respond to the actions of others.

He explains the Theological interpretation of Scripture better than the other books, provides some examples of how to do this with Scripture, and when he does not give an explanation of «how to» do it yourself, explains why such an explanation is impossible (p. 195).

Even as a public token of religious identity it is problematic when most people are unable to explain it properly even to themselves, let alone to others.

Msgr. Jaeger expanded upon that theme, noting that «while often presented as if it were absolutely new,» the teaching of Nostra Aetate «perfectly corresponds to the most ancient intuitions of Christian theology» when it affirms there can be, and in some cases are, «elements of truth and holiness» in other religions, particularly Judaism, as explained by St. Paul in the Epistle to the Romans.

And another BTW, how do you explain to a little kid that some other schoolmate has two mommies or two daddies when they have one mommie and one daddy?

A famous rabbi, when asked to explain the Torah while standing on one foot said: «What is hateful unto you, do not do unto others.

The REAL smoke and mirrors magic is worked when others go through so much obfuscation, twisting and interpreting in order to explain a collection of ancient scribblings that make no sense when honestly and critically assessed.