Sentences with phrase «when issues are discussed»

When issues are discussed openly, problem solving is direct and solution - oriented.
Too often we face the indifference of powers that be when issues are discussed relating to a «better» environment; the awareness is still lacking that we — all of us — constitute the environment; the human race is an integral part of it!
Weight cutting doesn't refer to shedding of normal muscle mass when the issue is discussed regarding health risks, it refers to the water weight cuts done during fight week.
The Mayor made similar remarks when the issue was discussed at Council.
If you don't know that, it is like writing all sorts of hifalutin physics on problems or non problems with bicycles, when the issue being discussed is a car.
«I always had an interest in public policy in a lot of different areas,» he says, noting that while growing up he would pay close attention when issues were discussed around the dinner table at home.

Not exact matches

I also discussed how you need to assess the critical nature of an issue - whether it's below the waterline or not - when it comes to delegating.
With five decades of experience in the banking and corporate sectors, there was no shortage of issues to be discussed when Tony Howarth sat down to lunch with Business News at the newly reopened Julio's restaurant.
The old rule of never discussing sex or politics is good in theory, but when the political climate gets heated it can be difficult to leave issues at the door
It's very common that low or mid impact issues are discussed at length at the start of the meetings and key issues are rushed in the final 20 minutes of a board meeting when people are tired or in a hurry to get to the next board meeting.
Flynn has acknowledged that he misled the federal agents by telling them that the issue of US sanctions on Russia had not been discussed when, in fact, it had.
UNESCO are due to meet in June, when they are expected to discuss the issue.
Trump is expected to meet Xi when he visits China next month, when the two are likely to discuss issues related to North Korea and U.S. - China trade.
When it comes to disciplining or firing an employee based on social media, the key issues are whether comments on Twitter, Facebook et al are protected under the 1935 National Labor Relations Act, which lets employees discuss working conditions.
When Strauss discusses the labor issues facing his industry, he likes to talk about a job site he was on last spring.
Go watch Mulcair's Economic Club of Canada speech where that's the first thing he brings up when discussing this issue (the portion covering this issue starts around 8:30, but the whole thing is worth watching).
We also discuss potential issues with ETFs, which are «not problematic when we go up; they may be problematic when we go down.
The stalemate in the US Congress will be tested again in the coming weeks when the issue of the debt ceiling is discussed and deficit reduction and spending cuts («sequestration») again top the agenda.
When discussing the biggest trade issues Canada faces with the U.S. — a proposed Border Adjustment Tax, softwood lumber disagreements and NAFTA renegotiation — Ambassador MacNaughton stated that he expects discussions to go well for Canada, but added the caveat that there will be bumps in the road.
One of the biggest issues many traditional investors and people have when discussing cryptocurrency is that, for the most part, it's backed by literally nothing.
When he received an invitation from Alberta - born internationally successful musician kd lang to meet in person to discuss LGBTQ issues, Kenney's spokesperson said the UCP leadership candidate was too busy.
It allows Democrats and their media allies decide when and how the abortion issue is discussed.
There's a lot of «they hate us because we're gay» vs. «they hate us because we're Christian» stuff going on when the cultural issues are being discussed on various places on the social media.
A large part of the problemvwhen discussing issues like this is that we utilize aristotalian language constructs that are dualistic and a major sign of this would be the use of the word «iswhen to be linguistically scientifically correct everything should be stated as «it appears so to me,» or some variation of this as it takes into account the many errors possible in how people perceive everything.
When you all focus on the issues that are not discussed in any detail in the bible, you simply are looking for arguments to denounce it.
When you are not capable or not willing to discuss the issue of homosexuality (one of the most troubling and divisive issues facing the church today) on substance, you simply sidestep the valid questions and seek to shame your opponents into submission.
Consequently, we need to be clear about what sort of unity, what model of integral oneness, we are adopting when we discuss these issues.
Jeremy, as I often do when I read your thoughts I'm again finding myself a going pretty meta; I spend time thinking about the ideas you present as I read them, but then I spend even more time wondering about how you think through issues and the mental framework you use to approach the issues you discuss on this blog.
I don't expect you to be perfect but I do hope on a site that is satirical and about the kind of issues discussed here I would hope to have some empathy and support when struggling and be able to have some fun and for you to own it when you get things wrong.
It certainly is a difficult issue, and I think more fair mined analysis such as your own is needed when discussing these issues.
But such are the sorts of issues and conversations that arise when you begin discussing Athanasius and Augustine: that they bear witness to the truth of the Gospel in a way that tills the ground for «deification» means we should listen carefully before rejecting it.
More often than not, when Christianity is discussed either in a fictional setting or in relation to real events, it is in the context of an issue related to human sexuality.
Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like to..
There are only dour men (mostly men, anyway) who think themselves progressive when they can discuss Gay Issues, but go into a sphincter seizure when they learn what a rim job is and that some people actually enjoy them.
One of the issues here that never gets discussed when these fights erupt is that since schools are public, ie gov» t run, they SHOULD be viewed as a part of gov» t that requires strict separation, but also WILL be under local majority rule.
Issues of conscience, responsibility, freedom and obedience are discussed in the light of the situation in Germany when this book was written.
historian, than Mel B. has made the statement: «AA members have always issued disclaimers when discussing God: Typical is, «Our program is spiritual, not religious.»
When one considers that among five Pentecostal denominations in North America there are over 15,000 credentialed women ministers, almost half of whom are in the Assemblies of God, it seems clear that the issue will continue to be debated and discussed.
So when we, in the Church, discuss homosexuality as though it were an issue faced by «other people» who are «out there,» when we resort to stereotypes and language about hell and judgment and damnation, we may be doing serious damage to the most precious and vulnerable among us.
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
This is particularly true when Christians take up the cause of the Palestinians — obviously a justice issue worth discussing.
Webb writes, «When it comes to cultural assessment, it matters little where our culture is on any of the issues discussed in this book!
Many of these issues were discussed when Congress debated the farm bill last year.
For this very issue, I try out update my personal blogs almost like I am speaking to a person or discussing with that audience directly web site esteem it helps participate people greater than publishing content formally especially when my blog situated surrounding the goings ons, regular thoughts and analysis about this to some degree controversial issue.
And, as late as March 1980, when the Southern Baptist Convention's Christian Life Commission met to discuss «Ethical Issues for the Eighties,» the keynote speaker was Sarah Weddington, who had successfully argued the case for Roe v. Wade before the Supreme Court seven years before.
And when it comes to discussing gender issues in particular, things get extra challenging because where outspoken men are often described as «passionate,» «convicted,» and «strong,» outspoken women are often perceived as «shrill,» «emotional,» «whiney,» and «bitchy.»
When there is a time and place where we could discuss these issues calmly in a group setting, I might be willing to do so.
when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.
So while I join you in wishing these discussions weren't necessary and also share in your nostalgia for a time when these topics didn't come up, I'm legitimately mystified as to how to discuss these issues without some overlap.
Why are all people not even mentioning Isaac Hayden when discussing this whole defensive cover issues!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z