Not exact matches
Economists like Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics say asset bubbles become dangerous
when they
lead to other imbalances in the economy.
Still, Clinton is exaggerating
when he says the 1993 bill «
led to an enormous flowering of the economy in America» because
economists say many factors played a role.
When critics like Brian Riedl, the campaign
economist for the presidential campaigns of Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio, fret that offering everyone a good job will
lead to «pressure to introduce a higher wage or certain benefits that the private sector doesn't offer,» proponents say: Yeah, it will; that's exactly the point.
When the first of the baby boomers entered the job market in the 1970s, many of them holding freshly minted college diplomas, the economic value of a bachelor's degree plummeted,
leading Harvard labor
economist Richard Freeman to fret over the plight of the «overeducated American.»
Folks, believe me
when I say that I trust the aggregate price discovery mechanism of the marketplace in the
leading stocks over what any
economist or lagging economic data tells me.
The British journal The
Economist, one of the most revered opinion bellwethers of the chattering classes, has for years been a
leading purveyor of the Al Gore - IPCC end - of - the - world fright peddling,
when it comes to global warming.
In the past,
when I've raised this international trade aspect here at CE (a paradigm used by
leading World
Economists), there has been no objective comments to this «big picture view» of the SCC — say, to discuss why China is implementing a carbon tax?