Not exact matches
When therefore we set out to study the events out of which it arose, and the part that its Founder played in them, we are not like archaeologists digging up the remains of a forgotten civilization, or
palaeontologists reconstructing an extinct organism.
Some
palaeontologists think stromatolites were formed
when growing mats of cyanobacteria trapped sediments and eventually fossilised.
Palaeontologists can date
when our ancestors lost the organ, as the tissue attaches to a skeletal feature called the hyoid bulla, which is absent in humans.
Palaeontologists fall into one of two camps
when it comes to naming species, «lumpers» and «splitters».
There's only so much
palaeontologists can learn about prehistoric animals from fossilized bones, so on rare occasions
when ancient soft tissues turn up, it's worth taking note.
Before now, if
palaeontologists had found the fossil remains of such a complex community of organisms, they would probably assume that the site was free of the ice shelf
when these animals were living there.
But
when he proposes links between his own historical field and that of climate science he drops all scholarly standards and quotes any old conference paper or telephone conversation he feels like; mad activists and conspiracy theorists like Oreskes and Powell; or Mark Maslin, a professor - cum - company director who combines his job at my old university as
palaeontologist or geographer or climatologist (all descriptions of his expertise taken from «the Conversation») with that of director of Rezatec Ltd, a company set up by the Royal Society as a «Leading provider of data - as - a-service geospatial data analytics» to serve those who may be worried to death by forecasts of eco-doom to be found in the books and articles of Mark Maslin.