Sentences with phrase «when viewed side»

But when viewed side - by - side with competing OLED panels, the improved QLED display shows a stark improvement over the first generation.

In the selected works on view, similarities in color and energy between the two artist's sculptural and painterly forms become apparent when viewed side - by - side.

Even when viewed side - by - side with TVs that cost 250 percent more, our viewing panel picked the TCL.»

Special 18 - inch light - alloy wheels in multi-spoke design accentuate the stylishness of the new BMW 3 Series Sport Wagon when viewed side - on.

It's worth noting that neither character had much control over their situation at the time of their journeys; this could account for the freewheeling and panic, but the similarities between the scenes stand out when viewed side - by - side.

When viewed side - by - side, the difference in perspective between the images captured by each of the video cameras becomes apparent.

Oh boy, it does look stunning and does not look out of place when viewing side - by - side with the cars like MB A-class, BMW 1 - series or Audi A3s.

Pentile screens need to have a higher PPI than LCD to overcome issues with sharpness, as well as color saturation, but in the end the OLED screen on the X is likely not that much sharper compared to the 8 when viewing side - by - side.

Not exact matches

Because the same side of the moon always faces our planet, such «Earthrise» views only happen when a spacecraft is moving.

Candidates on both sides of the aisle have sometimes espoused views that would seem to align them with the opposing party, especially when it comes to issues important to business owners.

And if the vituperative comments on my Facebook feed are any indication, people seem almost eager to be angry — as if we must all pick a side and take it as a personal affront when others don't share our views.

On the more positive side, America's budget problems are fixable — and not so terrible when viewed in a long - term global context.

There can be no true dialogue when each side is relating to a phantom of its own projection, however benevolent that projection might be, rather than to a view of the other side that the other side can truly accept about itself.

So when I see someone disagree, it must be up to me to ask why someone has a different view, and up to me to encourage questions, and try to see their side.

This approach is especially poisonous when examples are given of Christian views on both sides of the argument, as this leaves the impression that you can be a Catholic and support either side, because Catholics are Christians.

I am saying that just because something might have a secondary side effect of avoiding violence one day can not be viewed as a true violence reducer when on another day that something is the actual cause of violence.

And when that tradition seems to offer diverging views, Howard is able to present both sides with clarity and sympathy.

Just because something might have a secondary side effect of avoiding violence one day can not be viewed as a true violence reducer when on another day that something is the actual cause of violence.

Confirmation from others always helps us keep things in a more true perspective, when things are viewed from more than one side.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheview has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheView has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

It seems that in your view, Jesus didn't actually mean what He told the disciples in the Upper Room, for if there is a dark side to God, it was certainly hidden in Jesus during His ministry, which means that when Jesus tells Philip, «If you have seen me, you have seen the Father» what He really meant was «You haven't fully seen the Father, only the loving side.»

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

This is particularly true of CP's first marriage, of which I acquired an extremely one - sided view from a nephew who lived in the house of the couple at the time when the marriage was about to be ended by the husband.

At the same time, when it came to secondary matters - his preference for the KJV over the NIV or his pre-millennial view of the End Times - he would often pause and remind his audience «there are good Christians on both sides of this».

Had Paul been put in his place at Antioch, and Gentiles been required to accept the Law in order to be Christian, then the Church Fathers would have selected different books, ones supporting that view, when they canonized the Bible hundreds of years later, and you would very likely be arguing the other side now, right?

When viewed from this theistic perspective, these theses can be seen as two sides of the same coin:

Persons such as yourself who have a similar predisposition of course will side with someone ho supports your view and pretend they are objective but honesty is never as important as winning the argument when it comes to discrediting Christ.

When this gay marriage issue is viewed Religiously, which it is a lot, I guess their is evidence on both sides for «no» it is wrong, and «yes» it is not mans judgement to deny the marriage.

Nor is Ford reporting a fact when he claims that White - head decided to publish large amounts of writings conveying abandoned or superseded positions side by side with newer writings conveying his later or more mature views.

When he wrote Catholicism in the 1930s, de Lubac feared that the Church's current thinking was one - sided, occupied by an overly individualistic view of salvation.

He further states that «if» (as Dr. Bennett wrote) the Pope once made a speech which «in vague language seems to approve «the American view,»» the Pope's pronouncement, «if any such pronouncement exists must appear rather emaciated when contrasted with the overwhelming evidence of pronouncements on the other side.»

Even when we're trying to be as accurate as possible, if we're already on a particular «side,» this can hinder our ability to view the situation objectively.

When professionals on both sides have access to an aggregated view into information such as how much supply is committed versus what is available compared to regional demand, they can make investments accordingly.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

It's the same theme for ESPN pundit Craig Burley who has established a reputation for his no - nonsense views, and it's been no different when discussing the problems that Jurgen Klopp's side are encountering.

From an attacking point of view, we are going to be one of the most devastating sides to face when walcott returns.

That being the case, maybe had I watched the Utah game first instead of last during my first viewing, I'd have a more positive opinion of him when watching the other four games, which might have then colored my perception a little more on the positive side.

The negative side of the Premier League's policy is evident when viewing the recent history in the Champions League.

Fans have been much more respectable of his ability this term, but a new manager may not view him as good enough when trying to build his own side.

Do fans get a good view of the game and enjoy an incredible atmosphere when they are 50 metres from the side - line in a half - empty oval stadium designed for cricket or AFL?

More worrying than anything else is the fact seven of those have come when Wolves have gone travelling, although, what with Wolves at home this weekend, in the meantime it will be viewed as positive for punters as it means only three of their league defeats this season have come at Molineux, home of a very hungry Wolves side.

Manchester - born referee Anthony Taylor could be United's 12th man on Monday when the two sides meet in the Premier League at Anfield, that's the view of some Liverpool fans who...

Maybe they weren't at their strongest, they can't be when Eden Hazard doesn't start, but this was a talented Chelsea side on view that were as good as any team that we've played at home this season.

Unbeaten this season and victorious in nine of their 12 games, the Roten Bullen bandwagon shows no sign of slowing down and more and more people are coming around to the view that we are watching a remake of the 1997 - 98 campaign, when Kaiserslautern stunned the nation by becoming the first newly - promoted side to win a Bundsliga title.

Even when I stepped over to the other side where people usually stand, I was still in camera view.

The Br Baby Cute baby travel cot has four mesh side panels which allows good ventilation and also gives you a full view of your baby when in the travel cot.

Every parents needs are different and their view points when it comes to choosing between a tandem and a side by side stroller.

When you change sides you offer him a different view of you and help him develop both sides of his brain and body.

On the flip side, what happens when we begin to view our babies as our teachers?

When baby drops one, and it falls to the side, another is in view and reach.