Sentences with phrase «when writing a teaching»

Not exact matches

«Peter is one of the two people... who has taught me the most about how to invest in startups,» Altman wrote, when Thiel came on board in 2015.

When Flombaum teaches computer - science courses, he uses storytelling skills acquired while studying creative writing, and incorporates history into his lessons, including highlighting the programmer who created the concept at hand.

His plans also include teaching the assistant to let friends into his home by looking at their faces when they ring the doorbell, Zuckerberg wrote.

The same applies to his other passion: one reason Apstein teaches wine appreciation is that it keeps him immersed in the vintner's world, and that, in turn, makes him smarter when it comes time to write his columns.

No surprises there (except maybe that «Sincerely,» the word I was taught to use in elementary school when we learned to write letters, has clearly died a horrible death.)

In a blog post, researcher Janelle Shane wrote about some of the unconventional answers she's seen algorithms come up with when they're asked to teach themselves.

I have not retired yet — I'm still teaching economics, writing an investment newsletter and speaking at conferences — but like many of you, I'm concerned about making sure my wife and I have enough to live on if and when we decide to retire.

The Christian Bible was written by men, not women, and then rewritten time - and - again over the last several hundred years, by men, when the Bible failed to support the teachings of those «men».

My father also taught me, even when I was a child, that Bruce R. McConkie, who wrote some unflattering stuff about non-whites in «Mormon Doctrine,» stood in Conference after the 1978 announcement and said he had obviously been wrong on those points, and he retracted everything not in keeping with the Brethren's announcement.

When you teach a child writing, you hold its hand while it forms the letters: that is, it forms the letters because you are forming them.

«You reassured him,» John's mother wrote, «when you reaffirmed what he had been taught as a child.»

This I found disconcerting, since faithfulness to papal teaching has always been one of my guiding objectives when writing about the faith.

When Fox's book was written and published, Christians had outlawed atheists from the universities, or any teaching careers, besmirched their reputations, banned or burned their books or other writing of any kind, drove them into exile, humiliated them, seized their properties, and arrested them for blasphemy.

And again: «Let us hear the church when it teaches and admonishes,» he writes, «but one must not believe because of the authority of the church.

How do you reconcile using Augustine as an arbiter on Christianity when you plainly abhor the teachings of the Catholic Church, which he helped write?

I am intrigued that when Jesus stated ``... but not so among you, rather, you are to call no man your father... teacher... mentor... for you are all brothers», I think the model of «teaching» changed deeply into a model of equal disclosure and honesty, using perhaps the written Bible as a launching point for that disclosure and honesty.

Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen» (109)[The Day] when Allah will say, «O Jesus, Son of Mary, remember My favor upon you and upon your mother when I supported you with the Pure Spirit and you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and [remember] when I taught you writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel; and when you designed from clay [what was] like the form of a bird with My permission, then you breathed into it, and it became a bird with My permission; and you healed the blind and the leper with My permission; and when you brought forth the dead with My permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from [killing] you when you came to them with clear proofs and those who disbelieved among them said, «This is not but obvious magic.»

I wrote about this back in the chapter on cancelling the church service, but what if the teaching time took place in the busses and vans while a church was driving to a place of ministry, and then continued afterwards, when returning?

Ordinarily, when students are asked to write theological reflection papers on ministry experiences, they often fail to address the assignment — seminaries have taught them theology, but not how to reflect theologically.

It's taught in college courses that the bible was written in times when people were unruly and out of control to «scare» them into a straight and narrow path.

Tom, Tom and CH, when you don't go humble (meaning to shelf your ego) you just see words written in the Bible, your ego is blocking what Jesus teaches.

Now concerning the love of brothers and sisters, you do not need to have anyone write to you, for you yourselves have been taught by God to love one another... 1 Thessalonians 4:9 I remember the quiet summer night when things changed between my neighbor John and me.

When being a woman who preaches the Gospel or teaches with authority or writes a book that actually isn't expressly meant to be shelved in the «Women» section of the bookstore isn't so worthy of note.

Okay, after you have completely finished your study and have written out your manuscript and are ready to teach what you have learned, this is when you should consult your books and Bible commentaries and Bible study software.

She adores teaching and writing, especially when a good cup of tea is involved.

So, for instance, if it is not clear to the readers of my work that my writing is done by an Episcopalian Christian, I will have failed to practice this virtue — which, of course, includes my making clear at which points the materials I study or engage seem to me false, noxious, or incomplete; just as it includes my making clear when and in what ways it seems to me that the materials I engage are true, have taught me something I didn't know before, or may be of use to me and my community in its search to apprehend and incarnate the gospel.

It is memorable, gives some story «hooks» to hang the ideas on, and often keep the reader interested and moving forward when the normal method of teaching / writing would have left them bored.

Luke had been at pains to make clear that the risen Jesus was no otherworldly spirit but a physical form with flesh and bones, 42 who consequently presented his disciples with infallible proofs.41 The risen Christ came to be regarded as having conducted a fresh ministry with his disciples, and in these forty days he «taught them about the kingdom of God».41 But since the experience of the risen Christ was not of this character at the end of the century when Acts was written, it had to be made clear that this kind of experience was brought to an end by a new event, the Ascension.

Study the life and teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith and you can find out as I did when the Holy Ghost confirmed the truth of which I have just written to me and continues to as in our meetings today at church.

Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948), who often spoke of Jesus, wrote «the gentle figure of Christ, so patient, so kind, so loving, so full of forgiveness that he taught his followers not to retaliate when abused or struck but to turn the other cheek — it was a beautiful example, I thought, of the perfect man.»

At a time when individualism was still, generally speaking, obscuring the fullness of traditional catholic teaching on this mystery, he wrote: «When Christ comes to one of his faithful it is not simply in order to commune with him as an individual;... when, through the mouth of the priest, he says Hoc est corpus meum, these words extend beyond the morsel of bread over which they are said: they give birth to the whole mystical body of Chrwhen individualism was still, generally speaking, obscuring the fullness of traditional catholic teaching on this mystery, he wrote: «When Christ comes to one of his faithful it is not simply in order to commune with him as an individual;... when, through the mouth of the priest, he says Hoc est corpus meum, these words extend beyond the morsel of bread over which they are said: they give birth to the whole mystical body of ChrWhen Christ comes to one of his faithful it is not simply in order to commune with him as an individual;... when, through the mouth of the priest, he says Hoc est corpus meum, these words extend beyond the morsel of bread over which they are said: they give birth to the whole mystical body of Chrwhen, through the mouth of the priest, he says Hoc est corpus meum, these words extend beyond the morsel of bread over which they are said: they give birth to the whole mystical body of Christ.

As I look over the last couple decades of my life, it is when I am studying, teaching, and writing about Scripture that I feel most content, most fulfilled, most at home, most connected with God and with who He made me to be.

5:19 - 21 [written by Paul] when it comes up in preaching and teaching if a non-believer is in the audience?

(This is the overall purpose of everything I write and teach, by the way, to rescue Scripture, theology, and the church from these twisted ways of thinking, and to show people that God looks just like Jesus, and Scripture, when properly understood, leads us to love.)

When we teach and write about theology, we know next to nothing regarding the topic about which we speak, but we speak about it as if we know everything.

Sometimes when I get a bit carried away with a descriptive passage in my writing, I remind myself of a helpful little adage a favorite professor once taught me: «Try to avoid driving while under the influence of metaphors.»

Here he writes, in connection with the question of reconstructing authentic teaching of Jesus, «we have reasonably secure ground under our feet only in one particular instance, namely, when there is some way of showing that a piece of tradition has not been derived from Judaism and may not be ascribed to early Christianity, and this is particularly the case when Jewish Christianity has regarded this tradition as too bold and has toned it down or modified it in some way».

When Timothy said (Timothy 3:16) «All Scripture is God - breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,» there was no canon and he thought ANYTHING written was «scripture».

now people worship me and pay me to talk to them and teach them stuff... when they ask me to show them how to fly i referr them to books written by me they can purchase describing the topic in detail.

And for those going into the secondary teaching, or who'd just like to get a sense of how American teenagers really are when asked about serious things, I'm sure the book he wrote based upon his years of teaching, Meetings at the Metaphor Café, is very much worth reading.

«When it comes to homosexuality, the Bible's teaching is consistent, pervasive, uniform and set within a larger context of law and Gospel,» he wrote.

When President of the National Council of Catholic Bishops / United States Catholic Conference twenty - five years ago, the late John Cardinal Krol wrote the CHD's guidelines with regard to upholding the Church's moral teaching when it grants fuWhen President of the National Council of Catholic Bishops / United States Catholic Conference twenty - five years ago, the late John Cardinal Krol wrote the CHD's guidelines with regard to upholding the Church's moral teaching when it grants fuwhen it grants funds.

When this book, truly called the book of remembrance, taught to us in Malachi 3:16, was written, it starts out in Genesis 1:27, 28, and in the creation of a male, and of a female, all people, to inhabit this earth, and they were told to be fruitful, and to multiply this earth with their children, and in the 5th chapter of Genesis it is all the generations of Adam.

I feel God's pleasure when I discover something new about a certain Greek word in Luke 4:18 which I can then share with others through teaching or writing.

For, most confusingly, his John Knox persona suddenly turns into the reincarnation of Bishop Thomas Crammer, when, not forty pages later, he starts defending the hierarchy, albeit of the Anglican variety: «Pope Benedict XVI,» Wills sneers, «when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote in 1998 that it is an infallible teaching of the church that Anglican bishops and priests are fake bishops and priests, dispensing fake sacraments, because they are outside the apostolic succession.»

Jesus the Son of Marry (Peace and blessings be up on him) is known today to the Christian world as it is being described by John, Paul, Luke and others... whatever the way these human imagined him became the faith... record shows that the first book of NT was written at least 60 - 80 years after Jesus the son of Marry was taken away from this earth... and these writers used their vision as a weapon to get it to the brain of mankind... also there are debates among the Christian scholars that no one knows who is the writer of some of the gospels... someone else wrote it and used the names what we see today... i.e. no one knows when and who and how the Hebrew chapters were written... despite of lots of controversy on this, Christian scholars uses them to teach others...

I expect a good many readers will recognize what Jenson is getting at when he writes, «A great deal of our preaching and teaching is exactly backwards.

It took years of studying the history in which the Bible was written, learning about the other influences that often aren't taught in religious settings... and considering those religious influences, as well as the scientific and philosophical influences... to reach to the conclusions I have reached today — though I admit they still aren't and never will be perfect (like when I said IT doesn't care.

When I attend weddings, I'm not provided with the opportunity to talk about the really exciting ways that God's moving and using me — through my Master's degree classes, or the research project I'm wading through writing, or the middle school and high school girls Sunday school class I'm privileged to teach, or the fun trips I'm taking and the new people I'm meeting.

Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.