Our focus is on the world's poorest countries,
where the disease burden is greatest.
Not exact matches
Here, Wilson confronts the philosoher's dilemma,
where even if we can establish the best order of society within his «traditional conservatism» we are still «
burdened» with the imperfections of a citizenry beset by sundry
diseases of the mind, not to mention the soul.
«The Global
Burden of
Disease Study 2010, from
where the quoted study has obtained their data, suggests that in Australia the biggest causes of mortality or poor health include factors such as obesity, smoking, poor diet and low physical activity.
Partly based on these findings, the World Health Organization is recommending that this vaccine be used only in areas
where there is a known high
burden of
disease.
«By discovering the mechanism of how and
where bacteria initiate
disease, we think we can give a strong message to the medical community to stimulate the revision of currently used therapies and this could potentially result in a reduction of
disease burden and mortality in the UK and elsewhere.»
Our vision is a world
where the
burden caused by infectious
diseases endemic in developing countries, such as malaria, dengue fever and pneumococcus, is substantially reduced through effective monitoring, control and, eventually, elimination.
An early and leading priority to do this is to strengthen AMR surveillance, particularly in low - income countries
where the
burden of infectious
diseases is highest and
where data are most limited.
A 2012 study found that vector - borne and parasitic
diseases (VBPD) can negatively affect economic development and suggested an increased VBPD
burden where biodiversity decreases.
That includes increased funding for ACCHOs to expand in regions
where there are low access to health services and high levels of
disease, and in areas of mental health, disability services and aged care, and for areas
where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a high
burden of
disease or are particularly vulnerable, like ear health and renal
disease, delivered through ACCHOs.
Increased funding is needed for Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations to expand in areas
where there is poor access to health services and increased
burden of
disease, and to grow their capacity and respond to mental health, disability and aged care needs.
In other countries
where they don't have ubiquitous access to pap smear exams and cervical cancer screenings, cervical cancer plays a much better role in the
burden of
disease in their countries.»
Poor nutrition is a major determinant of excess morbidity and mortality among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, 1 contributing to over 16 % of the
burden of
disease.2 In this issue of the Journal (page 549), consistent with the «economics of food choice» theory, 3 Brimblecombe and O'Dea report that the diet of a remote Aboriginal community was high in energy - dense, nutrient - poor foods — the cheapest options to satisfy hunger.4 This energy — cost differential restricts access to healthy food, and helps explain the persistently poor dietary patterns and deplorable health status of remote Indigenous communities.4 Placing nutrition issues in an economic framework highlights the investment required to improve Indigenous nutrition.4 But what has been learned to date about
where resources should be directed?