Sentences with phrase «where valid claims»

Where valid claims overlap, the countries themselves are to settle the boundary dispute.

Not exact matches

What would probably happen would be employment of Taqiya - lying to unbelievers, where official leaders of Muslim community in France would publicly claim lots of thing like aforementioned verses in Quran are no longer valid, how Islam is religion of peace etc...

Likewise, the lower court rejected the ACLU's Blaine Amendment claim, holding that it «was not intended to preclude any expenditure that has an incidental benefit to religion, where such is made for a primary secular purpose,» and that the ESA «was enacted for the valid secular purpose of providing financial assistance to parents to take advantage of educational options available to Nevada children.»

But where this is valid is where the «scientists» claim their assertions are «science» and have the certainty of real science when they do not subject these assertions to the rigorous tests of the scientific methodology.

However, claims based on «eyeballing» and similar offered here in the thread by Mr. Coal - Magazine Editor, who is probably going to write his PhD thesis soon where he refutes global warming using «eyeballing», and by other «skeptics» are not a scientifically valid approach to provide evidence for the assertion of the «stopped» global warming.

Reducing benefits to accident victims, imposing systemic roadblocks to an accident victims right to pursue a wrongfully denied claim, creating a system where insurers can deny valid claims with impunity, all in the cause of reducing premiums, may be good politics but it is not good government.

Whilst the case does not in fact establish any new case law, it serves as a compelling reminder that the mutual trust and cooperation obligation does not require parties to act any differently under NEC3 than with other forms of construction contracts and should not be held as an axe to discourage a party in circumstances where it may have a valid claim.

Where drivers or passengers are injured due to the negligence or recklessness of others in a truck accident, they have valid claims for damages.

Where a claimant with a valid claim seeks to dishonestly enhance that claim or conspires with another so as to enable that person to present an exaggerated or groundless claim, should the claimant be struck out and be denied all compensation despite having a valid cause of action?

If there isn't one, perhaps that's because there's no truth to the claim that valid «thinking like a lawyer» is somehow a process that is qualitatively different than valid «thinking like a [insert the field the law student ostensibly earned his or her undergraduate degree in, where the student has one]».

As to the judges» example, you'd have to claim that judges (who are lawyers) shouldn't be allowed to judge any case where some of the parties are lawyers and some aren't, because there'd be a valid concern that the judge would be biased in favour of the lawyers merely because they're lawyers and the judges are, too.

Our history shows we have taken a number of cases where the client knew they had a valid claim but other attorneys didn't think they had one.

A «smash and grab» adjudication is where a contractor claims the sum due stated in its interim application on the basis that no valid payment notice or pay less notice has been issued by the paying party.

Elimination Period With health and disability policies, there is an elimination period where there is a delay before receiving benefits in order to ensure the claim is valid.

However, it still posed problems when Canadians tried renting cars or filing claims in accidents where the driver did not have a valid IDP.

There have been cases where clients have paid premiums for years thinking they have valid insurance, but when they have a claim, they are told that they are uninsurable and the claim is denied.

After a life insurance premium is missed, a policy will move into grace period status, where while technically delinquent, the insurance company is still responsible for paying a death benefit if a valid claim is filed for a death of the insured during this time.

This is the final stage where the company takes the mandate of deciding if the claim is valid or not.

Schuckman Realty v. Marine Midland Bank (244 A.D. 2d 400)- broker not entitled to recover a commission from defendant under contract theory where broker entered into brokerage agreements with parties other than the defendant; broker's claim against defendant in quantum meruit fails due to the existence of a valid and enforceable agreement governing the particular subject matter (i.e., commission agreement between broker and other parties).

Mucci v. Munsey Park Assoc. (231 A.D. 2d 501)- broker not entitled to commission; commission agreement provided that broker would only be entitled to a commission in the event that buyer exercised an option to purchase subject property and take title thereto; buyer neither exercised said option nor acquired title to the property; unavailing that purchaser had the same principals; broker's claim for recovery in quasi-contract fails where there is a valid and enforceable written contract governing the particular subject matter.