Whether ocean circulation models... neither explicitly accounting for the energy input into the system nor providing for spatial variability in the mixing, have any physical relevance under changed climate conditions is at issue.»
Not exact matches
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see
whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since
model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in
ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric
circulation.
I'd love to know what they did take into account in attempting to
model that period — must include astronomical location, sun's behavior, best estimates about a lot of different conditions — where the continents were, what the
ocean circulation was doing,
whether there had been a recent geological period that laid down a lot of methane hydrates available to be tipped by Pliocene warming into bubbling out rapidly.
It should also be noted that the authors examined
whether the large - scale
ocean circulation, the Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC), and two other ocean phenomena - the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Meridional Oscillation (AMO)- could explain the warming in the 20th century simulations, but found no evidence in
circulation, the Meridional Overturning
Circulation (MOC), and two other ocean phenomena - the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Meridional Oscillation (AMO)- could explain the warming in the 20th century simulations, but found no evidence in
Circulation (MOC), and two other
ocean phenomena - the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Meridional Oscillation (AMO)- could explain the warming in the 20th century simulations, but found no evidence in the
models.
Consequently, when a new
model is developed it is often checked
whether it can reproduce a «realistic» Atlantic THC [and also other
ocean circulations such as around the Antarctic].
This term often requires additional qualification (e.g., as to
whether or not the atmosphere is fully coupled to an
ocean — see «Atmosphere - Ocean General Circulation Model&raq
ocean — see «Atmosphere -
Ocean General Circulation Model&raq
Ocean General
Circulation Model»).
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see
whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since
model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in
ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric
circulation.
Further analyses of long coupled
model runs will be critical to resolve the influence of the
ocean thermohaline
circulation and other natural climate variations on Arctic climate and to determine
whether natural climate variability will make the Arctic more or less vulnerable to anthropogenic global warming.»
Here we probe the system to determine
whether certain regions of the Southern
Ocean are more critical than others for air — sea CO2 balance and the biological export production, by increasing surface nutrient drawdown in an ocean general circulation m
Ocean are more critical than others for air — sea CO2 balance and the biological export production, by increasing surface nutrient drawdown in an
ocean general circulation m
ocean general
circulation model.