Sentences with phrase «whether than means»

I often work with couples» who are looking to access greater intimacy, whether than means sexual intimacy or emotional intimacy.

St. James Club is all about having a good time... whether than means relaxing with a book beneath a palm tree or trying your hand at windsurfing in the bay.

Asked whether than meant that somebody in the de Blasio campaign had told BerlinRosen that the mayor had endorsed Cabrera but the campaign was now saying he had not, Levitan responded, «I'd prefer it being said it was a matter of the left hand not knowing what the right hand did.»

Not exact matches

Whether that means doling out mouthwatering samples from behind the counter, creating interactive games to play on the web or offering online courses that teach people how to make their own pasta, today's marketers need to deliver more than slick sales pitches and rock - bottom prices — or risk getting left in the dust.

Whether it's for a coffee date, a catch up with an old friend or even an interview, going to Starbucks or Philz is an experience, and entrepreneurship means understanding how to create a feeling, rather than simply sell a product.

While much of what Imbellus is building is still under wraps, the company's approach will be closer to showing your work on a math test rather than just writing down the solution, meaning it'll track how you solve a problem — not just whether you get the answer right.

For hockey legend Cam Neely, the milestone instead meant being ordered to move more than 3,000 miles across North America, whether he liked it or not.

Whether Infinity War can catch Black Panther (whose long, leggy run meant it was still in the top five at the box office last week, more than two months after its opening) in the US and Canada seems unlikely, but it should become the year's top hit internationally without too much trouble.

Whether that means Canada will enjoy below - potential growth or that potential has taken a larger hit than the Bank of Canada currently believes is another matter, but is certainly one of the larger monetary policy questions that remains unanswered, especially with core inflation lingering above 2 percent.

That move stems from a similar place as Target's: An inability to out - innovate Amazon, whether by turning stores into a real advantage rather than legacy baggage or by other means.

For most enterprises, this means accessing business funding from time to time rather than relying on reserves, whether this credit is taken through mainstream banks or alternative finance.

Whether or not Trump means what he says, his speech is no more «plain» than his manners.

I have heard many different theologians debate whether the behemoth was a crocodile or a hippo and some say it refered to a dino of some kind, none had any more proof than conjecturing about what the ancient hebrew words to describe it really meant.

And these people have been taught for so long to take their religious leaders at their word and that their religion means more than anything that they don't care whether the person is lying or not.

We might question whether execution is always the most effective and fair means toward the end of protecting its citizens, and there may be many who misunderstand the purpose of the death penalty, construing it to be more than it really is.

The most painful part of the process, though, was when friends and well - meaning mentors dismissed my questions as silly, or, even worse, questioned whether my doubt was nothing more than an attempt to justify some sort of secret sin in my life, usually pride.

D. Martyn Lloyd - Jones (1899 - 1981)[in an excerpt from Romans: The New Man, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace.

«There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do;....

If it is true, as Holloway argues, that the very foundations of matter and the identity of human nature are aligned upon the coming of the Word made flesh, then a society which is uncertain about the existence of God and whether Man has any meaning or purpose must be subject to crisis, alienation and chaos even more inevitably than CiV is able to show.

I think what I should have said was that «it» was better than nothing meaning to find out and get some sense of direction to take on whether to accept or not accept the existence of God.

Certainly individuals are different than nation states (by this I mean that as individuals our choices are clearer - not that we can not properly discern whether a particular war is or is not necessary - but even then its much much tougher) and matters of war and peace are very much filled with variables men and women as individuals would have an a very difficult task of unwinding to find some acceptable scenario.

The retreat of the humanities into the religious sector, important though it is, would mean abandoning too many students who yearn (whether they know it or not) to be more than cultural tourists.

On the other hand, whether the zeros mean impossibility or lacking modal status, there are more options than are explicitly represented on the table.

If such talk is construed objectively, as asserting that God is in some way the object of human experience, the fact that «God» must be understood to express a nonempirical concept means that no empirical evidence can possibly be relevant to the question of whether the concept applies and that, therefore, God must be experienced directly rather than merely indirectly through first experiencing something else.

RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish people well whether you agree or disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...

If it is construed as the first, it means God's own experience as an experiencing subject, whether the experience be of God's self alone or also of some object or objects other than God.

Because It was not created for that reason whether were males or females... nor it was meant that men go for men or women go for women... And those laws were among God's commandments to mankind which he had narrated as a sin within his Holy Scriptures and the Holy Quran giving examples of ancient generations that were doomed for disbelieving and breaking heavenly laws... those narrated tales were for us to learn and take heed rather than repeat same ill doing...

That means in this instance that economists refuse to judge whether it is better to add to the consumption of one person rather than another, that is, they are unwilling to judge that the increase of wellbeing in toto will be less when a hundred dollars is added to the income of a rich person than when it adds to the income of a poor one.

This raises the question of whether being religiously unaffiliated among African - Americans and Hispanics means something different than it means among their white counterparts.

William A. Beardslee speaks from a different perspective than that of Theodore Runyon, but both raise the important question of the meaning of the dialectic of faith, just as both pose the question of whether my position is dialectical or dualistic.

He contends that everyone, including atheists and agnostics, acknowledges the importance of «considering whether there is some ultimate, more - than - human source of meaning and value» and then of living one's life according to one's conclusion.

Far more important than the question as to whether such occasional prayers can be answered as we wish is the basic need of all men to be sure that life has meaning.

Questions such as whether the language of «faith» has any authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are free or determined, whether there is any «objective» truth to the symbols and myths of religion — all of these questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this process.

With the revision and republication of the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans in 1922, Barth sounded with piercing clarity the theme that God is simply greater than all the attempts of theologians — whether liberal or conservative, whether modern, premodern or postmodern — to capture God within the confines of a single, self - contained framework of linguistic meaning.

Any real plan for a sustainable budget (whether right or left) will mean that a lot of people will be getting less, some (or many) will be paying more and relatively few will be getting more than what has already been promised.

Many others would agree on the second point, arguing that confession of the apostolic faith means much more than confessing the creed — whether that «more» involves sacramental unity or acting on behalf of justice.

Whether that means Wenger is trying to get Paulista for less than this remains to be seen but Wenger admitted that he did have a release clause in his contract of 20 million euros so he is clearly trying to pay less or there would be no need for talks.

I don't know whether its fair to criticize the manager for every loss we suffer, I mean... a manager can only be blamed when his team gets outplayed... if his team keeps on creating more than 4 chances a game, that shows that he has some good tactics.

@jamaicanarsenal which people are you referring to as the delusional fools?I guess you've been watching most of the matches with one eye haven't you.It takes more than delusion to say Walcott is actually playing cf instead of Sanchez in this team.Giroud is also a cf and that's why many are contemplating whether he should start the next game which means replacing Alexis in the cf role and shifting him back to wings.

Deondre has demonstrated his decision making and his priorities through his actions, i.e., that «I» is bigger than «y ’ all» — whether that means family, future, or FSU football.

I just don't get you guys at times.What's with all the hype?The downfall of a team is not dependent on whether the team's best player leaves or not.It's much more than that.People can not just say that if Arsenal sign Lacazette and Alexis leaves we wil not improve.People acting as if we've not had better players leave the club who we have survived without.It's funny how everyone is predicting doom if Alexis leaves but I wonder who will be shocked if we place 4th without him in the squad next season.It's not all about Alexis you.Transition is part of life so you you just have to take it as it comes.If you think Alexis» departure means Arsenal downfall you guys are all wrong.Now look how many are claiming Alexis is irreplaceable.Yet before he came many wouldn't have said that.Alexis is a replaceable player to me because someone might even come and do better.Look at him before he came and look at him now there's your evidence.Who did he replace?

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

In parenthesis, the FA, in its familiar cack - handed way, had made a dog's dinner into enquiring whether Mourinho had called her the daughter of a whore, which it now seems he accepted that he did, engaging a linguist who duly and mistakenly reassured them that the Portuguese word which Mourinho used was filho rather than filha meaning son rather than daughter which in context made no sense at all.

Until you know whether she's going to stick with a particular sport or position, it's just too pricey to buy new equipment every season — which could mean every few months, if she plays more than one sport or has any brothers or sisters.

Because Amy Tuteur, MD didn't describe the core beliefs of the cult I can't tell whether she means that the beliefs are unfalsifiable (undetectable goodness of vaginal birth) or whether she means that the cult members are resistant to evidence (home birth is as safe as or even safer than hospital birth) which is NOT what unfalsifiable means.

And on the matter of HFCS itself: Whether or not people believe that HFCS is any worse than regular table sugar, the fact is that any refined sugar not only has no nutritional value whatsoever — it's actually an anti-nutrient, which means your body uses up valuable resources to process it.

The biggest fluctuations depend on whether or not get naps (he's never fallen asleep in less than 7 hours after any kind of nap) so a late catnap means very late bedtime and even on no nap days he seems to get tired around 4 pm and pushing past this means he is overtired already so cortisol kicks in and we are up way past what I would consider a suitable bedtime.

Whether labor progresses smoothly, or an emergency means constant monitoring, what a doctor does during L&D can affect more than just mom's attitude.

This means that if your baby is less than 12 weeks old, you can ENJOY YOUR BABY without stressing about whether or not holding him too much is causing a sleep issue.

All mothers originally breastfed their babies, so the study was meant to compare how long infants were breastfed, rather than whether they were breastfed at all, Martin said.