Not exact matches
133 (1) Despite the grievance and arbitration provisions in a
collective agreement or deemed to be included in a
collective agreement under section 48, a party to a
collective agreement between an employer or employers» organization and a trade union or council of trade unions may refer a grievance concerning the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the
agreement, including any question as to
whether a matter is arbitrable, to the Board for final and binding determination.
49 (1) Despite the arbitration provision in a
collective agreement or deemed to be included in a
collective agreement under section 48, a party to a
collective agreement may request the Minister to refer to a single arbitrator, to be appointed by the Minister, any difference between the parties to the
collective agreement arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the
agreement, including any question as to
whether a matter is arbitrable.
The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently determined that in a unionized workplace, a dispute about
whether the employer has complied with its obligations
under the Employment Insurance Premium Reduction Program
under the Employment Insurance Act, must be determined by an arbitrator appointed
under the
collective agreement, and not by a court.
277.41 A
collective agreement between a board and a designated bargaining agent for a teachers» bargaining unit may provide for the final and binding settlement by arbitration, without stoppage of work, of all differences between the parties arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of this Part or any regulation, guideline, rule or policy
under it, including any question as to
whether a matter is arbitrable.
101 (1) This section applies if, during a proceeding before an arbitrator, other than the Board, concerning an alleged contravention of this Act, an issue is raised concerning
whether the employer to whom the
collective agreement applies or applied and another person are to be treated as one employer
under section 4.
In the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Cooper v. Miller, 1994 1 SCR 359, the issue again was
whether wage loss payments
under an insurance program offered as an employment benefit to unionized employees pursuant to a
collective agreement could be deducted off a past wage loss award.
It first considered
whether the standby duty directive was a reasonable exercise of the Employer's discretion
under the Management Rights clause of the
collective agreement in light of its effect on the lawyers» personal lives and the Employer's business objectives.
Unionized employees don't necessarily have the option of suing their employer, but they can grieve an incident of sexual harassment
under the relevant
collective agreement whether or not it includes a specific term (s).
The legal obligations imposed
under OHS, human rights and employment standards laws are incorporated into every
collective agreement,
whether or not the
agreement expressly says so.