Sentences with phrase «which wegman»

4 sessions he organized in which Wegman was an invited speaker: 1987, 1987, 1989, 1990.

The allegation pertains to Wegman's boilerplate section (2.1) describing proxies, a section in which neither MBH98 - 99 nor MM2003, 2005abcd are mentioned, and on which no Wegman conclusions depend.

at the 2006 ASA meeting discussing statistics and climate change, to which Wegman, Mike Wallace of the NAS panel and Smith himself spoke.

Don't miss the brief essays at the end in which Wegman discusses his work and his dogs.

Not exact matches

Discounters like Aldi or Lidl aside every grocery store — and I live in a small town — carries at least a semi-acceptable kind of peanut butter [read: containing added oils and some sugar which it looks like Wegman's PB had, too].

Unlike the tree - ring case, which included additions and divergences (see previous PDF), Wegman's sections on ice core and coral proxies appear to be based on a close following of Bradley's text (except as noted below).

In this follow up post, I» ll examine the Wegman's treatment of other proxies, which were also derived from Bradley.

However, in a bizarre twist, it appears that the committee did not even consider side - by - side comparison of the Wegman Report's long and unreferenced background section on social network analysis, part of which was reused in the later CSDA article and gave rise to the plagiarism finding in the other GMU case!

This was deliberately framed to give a broader overview than the charge to the Wegman committee, which was specifically focused on Michael Mann's papers and the critiques of those papers.

Its biggest financial supporter is the Wegman Family Charitable Foundation, which contributes a little less than half the program's $ 8 million budget in Rochester.

Feast your eyes on color, composition and personalities galore in these photography and art books, which include a landmark offering from Annie Leibovitz, a collection of artful fiction, never - before - published photos of Julia Child in France, as well as William Wegman's charming, artsy dogs.

The exhibition offers a unique, hands - on experience which encourages viewers to browse or peruse an eclectic selection of contemporary works by an international group of artists including John Baldessari, Nan Goldin, Jenny Holzer, Sol LeWitt, Rosemarie Trockel, and William Wegman among many others.

More than 300 guests attended the event, which raised over $ 400,000 through ticket sales at 7 World Trade Center in Manhattan and honored artist and musician Laurie Anderson; interior designer, furniture designer, and artist Juan Montoya; and artist, filmmaker, and photographer William Wegman.

But even if you've missed these exhibits, you can enjoy a wide selection of Wegman's work in the newly published William Wegman: Paintings, from Abrams Books, which includes commentary by radio comic Bob Elliott, New Yorker writer Susan Orlean and others.

Numerous retrospectives of Wegman's work have been made among them Wegman's World, which opened at the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis in 1981 and toured the United States and William Wegman: Paintings, Drawings, Photographs, Videotapes, which opened at the Kunstmuseum, Lucerne in 1990 traveling to venues across Europe and the United States including the Pompidou Center, Paris and The Whitney Museum of American Art, New York.

After Man Ray's death, in 1985 a sympathetic dog breeder offered Wegman a female Weimaraner puppy, which the artist named Fay Ray (after Fay Wray, the female lead actress in «King Kong»).

«Video Acts» concentrates on path - breaking pieces from the late»60s and early»70s by people such as Bruce Nauman, Vito Acconci, Joan Jonas, Nam June Paik, Peter Campus, William Wegman and John Baldassari: a history lesson from which every visitor will learn.

The exhibit, which opens Sunday, displays 150 works across a variety of media, including pieces by New York - based artists Martha Rosler, David Hammons and William Wegman that were created in California.

Sperone Westwater's exhibition coincides with «William Wegman: Funney / Strange,» a major retrospective exploring 40 years of the artist's work in all media, which opens at the Brooklyn Museum on 10 March and continues its tour at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, D.C., the Norton Museum of Art, Palm Beach, FL, and the Addison Gallery of American Art, Andover, MA.

It happened at Pomona chronicles the particularly fertile circle - then - upstarts locals Michael Asher, Chris Burden, Judy Chicago, Robert Irwin, James Turrell and William Wegman among them - which, for a brief moment, turned Pomona College's art museum into an internationally significant showcase of postminimalism, photography, light - and - space ideas and more.

No production values here: just a view of William Wegman's torso, which suddenly looks like a face and seems to make noises when he tightens his stomach.

Also in 1970, Sharp curated «Body Works», an exhibition of video works by Vito Acconci, Terry Fox, Richard Serra, Keith Sonnier, Dennis Oppenheim and William Wegman which was presented at Tom Marioni's Museum of Conceptual Art, San Francisco, California.

Rothenberg is represented locally by Sperone Westwater Gallery, which also offers works by Art21 artists Laurie Simmons, Bruce Nauman, Richard Tuttle and William Wegman.

The impressive contents of these sagging cartons included little - known works from the Women's Building and early videos by Paul McCarthy, Bruce and Norman Yonemoto, Bruce Nauman, William Wegman, and Eleanor Antin, together with performance tapes and audio recordings, many of which have found their way into «California Video.»

Wegman donated 174 of his videos, which he made between 1970 and 1999, to the museum — the occasion for this exhibition.

Text that is 50 % + cut - and - paste, plus trivial rewordings of the sort often done by student to evade plagiarism - detection software, and modest rephrasings, is not... Some of that material showed up later in a journal for which Said was an associate editor, and Wegman a long - time advisor, impressively moving Received to Accepted in 6 days, and citing 3 separate government contracts for support.

I would guess that this comment goes back to: a) McIntyre directly talkign to Montford OR b) The Wegman Report, specifically Figure 5.8 on p. 46 (p. 45 of the PDF), which may possibly have come from McIntyre.

You are misrepresenting what Wegman [very carefully] lays out: the incestuous relationships between grant recipients, which results in each passing uncritical peer review for the other, for the purpose of obtaining public grant money.

Strong evidence is provided by the Wegman Report [linked above], which specifically lays out the social connections between the very small clique of climate grant beneficiaries in a rigorous statistical manner.

In his report Wegman covered both the standard of a research in a high profile work and the way in which the community operated.

The Committee is investigating the charge they were peer reviewing each other's work, which was confirmed by the Wegman report.

This time, I'm looking at section 2.2 (see Wegman Report PDF at p. 15), which gives the background of key statistical concepts, including Principal Component Analysis.

But Banks also happens to have been one of the reviewers of the Wegman report, which stands as an eternal monument to the dangers of combining knowledge of statistical methods with abject subject matter ignorance (not to mention highly dubious scholarship).

While auditors are still wondering about the semantical nuances between reproduction is replication, it would be interesting to know in which sense Wegman conducted an independent inquiry.

The report for Barton was prepared by three statisticians, Edward Wegman, David Scott and Yasmin Said, and its only novel contribution is a social network analysis, which is meant to show that the various independent studies aren't really independent and that peer review has broken down, since the same group of interlinked academics is reviewing each others» papers.

This was deliberately framed to give a broader overview than the charge to the Wegman committee, which was specifically focused on Michael Mann's papers and the critiques of those papers.

Mann et al. have had been exposed as poor mathematicians & the IPCC review process as well as the peer review processes of the journals which published MBH98 & MBH99 have been found wanting.snipThe issue of the IPCC's breach of trust in not picking up the hockey - stick flaws in IPCC 2001 is raised although Wegman's tone is more moderate.

Now contrast that with George Mason University, which has yet to announce a public inquiry into the Wegman scandal despite clear prima facie evidence of misconduct and co-operation with a biased partisan attack on other colleagues.

Thanks for the work you've done in reviewing the Wegman Report (which never had an independent review).

The thing about Rapp's book is that he was fairly careful to cite most things in Chapter 1 EXCEPT Wegman (with small lapses) but the copy and paste from Wegman is extensive and uncited which is why Eli is not completely abandoning the idea that Wegman copied from Rapp with permission.

To see what I mean, check out http://tinyurl.com/n8g6g, which points to a PDF copy of the «Wegman report» that contains this bogus hockey - stick criticism.

The article goes on to link to my previous discussion and analysis of the Wegman Report's background section on paleoclimatology, which indicated that passages had been apparently lifted nearly verbatim from Bradley's Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary, and then edited in a manner that introduced distortions and errors.

It suggests that the «litigation» mentioned by Dr Wegman is a copyright violation claim by Elsevier which owns Academic Press, the publisher of Bradley's Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary.

Nor has he bothered with the allegation of plagiarism in the federally - funded Said et al 2008 (including Wegman as co-author), a matter which will be under the oversight of the NIH Office of Research Integrity.

Their non-provision by Wegman strongly suggests that they did not actually do the test computations they implied they did — which would classify as fabrication.

«I was also somewhat taken aback by the tone of the Wegman Report, which seems overly accusatory towards Dr. Mann and his colleagues, rather than being a neutral, impartial assessment of the techniques used in his research.

Keep your eye on the ball, which is the science, and Rapp, Wegman, and Joe Barton don't have a single leg to stand on.

Don't worry about which experts impress you, read the Wegman report on the Hockey Stick or Montford's Hockey Stick Illusion, read Brian Sussman's book, Climategate, or Ian Wishart's Air Con, or even Jo's Skeptic's Handbook.

The story really starts with my first piece on the Wegman report just over a year ago, which noted unmistakable copying of unattributed antecedent sources in background sections on tree ring proxies (taken from Bradley's text book Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary) and on social networks (identifying Wikipedia, as well as and Wasserman and Faust as obvious sources).

b) Looking at Wegman's absurd talk to 2007 NCAR, about which I got feedback from 2 attendees, both rather negative.