Sentences with phrase «which means of this fact»

Which means of this fact, we now beget a barely easy solution that will remodel your mobile instrument into latest android Eight.zero.

Not exact matches

The fact is, stories on Apple products inevitably get tons of readers, which means a few things.

As a matter of fact, there is no point in denying that by all means clichés surely increase the number of words in the text, which is clearly seen in this sentence.

But I'm disturbed by the glee with which so many people celebrated the fact that he lost his job — his source of income, his means of supporting his family — as a result of his drunken bad behaviour.

Despite the fact that its brand name is synonymous with one of the world's most popular condiments, Heinz remains billions of dollars in debt, which means the buyout could be both good news and bad news for the company.

As Thompson explains, tulips in fact were becoming more popular, particularly in Germany, and, as the first phase of the 30 Years War wound down, it looked like Germany would be victorious, which would mean a better market for tulips.

It concerns the fact that she sees up to 50 % of all consumer credit lines being yanked at exactly the worst time for any prospects of a recovery... which would mean now.

And in fact it's interesting you mention that because that wasn't just a personal perception that I had about what a good salesperson does — it's a little bit of trivia here, but the word «selling» is actually derived from the word «sillus» (no idea how to spell, Google didn't help, sorry), which means «to serve».

It is disturbing not because of Bitcoin Core's lack of enthusiasm for standing against Segwit2x, which is the way it appeared, but rather it was the fact that the people who support Segwit2x went to great lengths to confuse the general public about Segwit2x, what it meant, what it would do and even spent a good deal of time convincing people it was not an option, but a requirement; a simple software upgrade.

The public isn't allowed to know what is specified in the full text of the TPP, which means that public knowledge of the agreement is limited — and according to one poll, most Canadians aren't even aware the agreement exists, despite the fact that one of the many rounds of negotiations was held in Canada -LSB-...]

The public isn't allowed to know what is specified in the full text of the TPP, which means that public knowledge of the agreement is limited — and according to one poll, most Canadians aren't even aware the agreement exists, despite the fact that one of the many rounds of negotiations was held in Canada during an unpublicized Ottawa meeting from July 3 to 12, 2014.

In fact, the FHA states that, «Assumptions without credit approval are grounds for acceleration of the mortgage,» which means the buyer can lose the property to foreclosure.

The fact that the demand for credit is distinct from the demand for money, and that the two things can change independently, means, among other things, that interest rates, which adjust to «clear» markets for various kinds of credit, can not also be counted on to «clear» the market for money balances.

These names relate to the fact that two positions are purchased, both Put and Call, which would mean that you are on both sides of the fence, or straddling the trade.

The study cites the fact that about 25 to 30 % of investment comes from those who are first degree associations of the company, which means that 70 to 75 % would have to come from those investors they didn't already know.

Now that the Republican and Democratic Conventions are over with, we can move on to the actual debate portion of the election, which means that your Facebook feed is about to get stormed by a barrage of thoughtful, reasonable, measured political opinions that will never be inflammatory hyperbole packed to the brim with dubious facts.

Many of you seem to be thoughtful articulate peolpe, however, I must call out the fact that many of you presuppose our system as the best possible system (by system I mean our capitalist society) ie it does not matter to great degree which party you espouse they still work within the confines of a system.

Hitler wrote a speech in which he talks about this alliance, this is an excerpt: «The fact that the Vatican is concluding a treaty with the new Germany means the acknowledgement of the National Socialist state by the Catholic Church.

using your argument we would had civil rights in this country just because goverments make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as doe more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.

Here's the thing — you can find any number of Stepford-esque church members who will attest that they and the folks they know are «just good people», etc. (and I, too, know many very pleasant and admirable Mormons), but that doesn't address the creepy facts related to the administration of the overall organization (which is by no means a true non-profit, BTW).

In fact the new testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written yet.

You're obviously not quite right in the head and I view all of your comment with that fact in mind, which means among other things you can't strike anything other than maybe the keys on your keyboard.

Carl Jung, among others, would answer Yes, and say that this possibility is in fact a whole process of life in which a universal unconscious gradually makes itself known to individual lives and eventually brings a conscious insight into their meaning.

That does not mean only (or not primarily) that there is no foreseeable end to the program — a fact which, in view of what we are at present presented with, admittedly makes a certain hostility to the media understandable.

Case in point: «fact», which apparently means «wild flight of my imagination» to this guy.

It is the living fact of their place within the laws and layers of meaning embedded and embodied in creation as set out in God's great purpose which is to be fulfilled in Christ.

Usually we intend all three of these meanings and have no need to discriminate them, since in fact they can not be separated in the moment in which the aim (in any of these senses) is effective.

In fact, we may rightly claim that the preaching of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments must necessarily go together; to put it in language used by Professor Whitehead in Religion in the Making, the «cult» (by which Whitehead meant the social action of worship) and the «myth» (by which he meant the story which explains a society's worship) can never be separated.

It is the fact that non-functional sequences of dna have been passed down from parent species prior to a split in sub species or classifications and exist on the exact same location within the strand of the other sub species, which was the final evidence convincing me that God did indeed use evolution as His means of creation.

It is the vision of something which stands beyond, behind and within, the passing flux of immediate things; something which is real, and yet waiting to be realized; something which is a remote possibility, and yet the greatest of present facts; something that gives meaning to all that passes, and yet eludes apprehension; something whose possession is the final good, and yet is beyond all reach; something which is the ultimate ideal, and the hopeless quest.

No, the meaning of man, and the intelligibility of man, which must proceed as a factor from the very fact that man does exist, and must mean something, this intelligibility of man is related not to the Divine Essence as a claim, but only to the Divine Wisdom, as a principle of meaning for the whole of creation.

That I was not aware, while working out my philosophy of religion, how much I was repeating some aspects of the paternal train of thought was partly a consequence of the facts that, from the age of fourteen on, I was much away from home at boarding school or college, in the army, studying in Europe, as instructor or research Fellow at Harvard, or otherwise occupied, all of which meant that I was seldom exposed to Father's sermons.

In his encyclical Divini Illius Magistri, issued in 1939, Pope Pius XI deplored the fact that «these most powerful means of publicity, which can be of great utility for instruction and education when directed by sound principles, are only too often used as an incentive to evil passions and greed for gain.»

Facts will never render decisions between ill - conceived alternatives; and the meaning of such terms as omnipotence or goodness depends in second - type theism upon a number of conceptions which have not been clearly considered in the classic discussions (such as the marvelous one in Hume's Dialogues) of the relations of such terms to the facts of Facts will never render decisions between ill - conceived alternatives; and the meaning of such terms as omnipotence or goodness depends in second - type theism upon a number of conceptions which have not been clearly considered in the classic discussions (such as the marvelous one in Hume's Dialogues) of the relations of such terms to the facts of facts of evil.

It's a fact of life: Women tend to be written off as incomplete until they achieve motherhood, which means we get pestered at every point along the way:

In fact, an inscription that was found at Caesarea Maritima, ludaea there is an inscription dedicated to Pilate which reads, «praefectus iudaeae» which means «prefect of Judea».

A philosopher notes three areas in which linguistic philosophy could broaden itself: 16 (1) broaden the verifiability principle so as to make other experiences besides sense experience possible, (2) abandon the viewpoint that would reduce all meaning of things to present or actual fact, and (3) pay more attention to conceptual frameworks through which we seek to apprehend the world.

Some people seem to be ignoring the reality of the fact that what many organized religious organizations teach as Christianity has almost nothing in common with what Jesus Christ taught, which is the real meaning of this young person's video.

As the actual Church in fact does not fulfill it, does not advocate concrete social demands energetically enough, does not dissociate itself radically or quickly enough from dying social forms, does not stigmatize nuclear warfare profoundly enough (all this according to the opinion of these Christians, which objectively is by no means necessarily false), they experience one disappointment after another in regard to the Church, protest against it, hurt and irritated, and turn into lay defeatists.

It is valid for a static universe in which present facts alone count and the future is considered of no linguistic value or is reduced to present statements and in which reason is considered statically, that is, as adequate and sufficient for attaining all the meaning there is, when, as a matter of fact, reason is evolving.

The controversy which followed this broadcast was therefore not about the fact of the Resurrection (except where my meaning had been misunderstood), but about its nature: about what we may believe to have actually happened at Easter.

The very fact that six historically influential ideas are presented in terms of development, with their later formulations on an altitude immeasurably higher than the lowlands from which they came, may produce the illusion of constant ascent, as though being posterior in time always meant being superior in quality.

The word which got translated into Latin as «credo» did not really mean «I believe this as actual fact» but something more like «I put my faith in, or I commit myself to, or I follow the teaching of...».

This does not mean that the interpreter must become a metaphysician in the sense of making metaphysical judgments — although, at some point these become unavoidable and are in fact implicitly at work from the beginning, as in all thought — but rather that he or she is responsible for recognizing the metaphysical question which the thrust of the text implies.

If so, all intentional terms are deprived of their specific meanings by being attributed, in the interests of an arbitrary philosophical thesis, to domains to which they do not in fact belong.

The fact is that owning a gun doubles your likelihood of being killed by a gun in your lifetime which means not owning one, regardless of what idiots and morons will claim with absolutely no evidence of their own of somehow being «safer» with a gun, are lying to you.

Just as ridiculous is the post modern response of «they cant change» - which if true would mean that any addiction or sin would be unchangeable despite the facts humans change all the time and I am NOT speaking of through Christ.

Yet trouble enters when we quote verses here and there and put meanings on them which are not supported either by the total message of Jesus or by the facts of our own experience.

But he was more interested in the fact that each religion was presumed to possess the same «spiritual values» of «the American Way of Life,» by which he meant a soft - hearted faith in democracy (political, economic, and religious) combined with a more robust faith in idealism, activism, and moral conviction.

In fact, it is too long to correspond with the date of Herod Agrippa's death, by means of which we are able on the basis of Luke's information to date his second visit.