Sentences with phrase «while people argue»

While some people argue that a physical address is not necessary, others would argue that the physical address demonstrates stability.

While some people argue that professional summaries and cover letters are the same and that you can forego one if you have done the other, it is not the right thing to do.

While some people argue unpaid work is an inevitable step on the career ladder, there's is a strong argument that it's unlawful exploitation.

(UNDP) While some people argue that no subsidies are justified, others are promoting temporary subsidies for renewables.

While people argue about the numbers, index funds tend to do better than average (depends on what you call «average», of course).

There's been almost no discussion, at least in places where I look, about Titles II through X of the 2002 (NCLB) version, and most of Title I's myriad provisions seem also to have been set aside while people argue over the future of annual testing.

Not exact matches

While some people don't love his approach or style, it's hard to argue with the results and passionate fan base he attracts around the globe.

While some have argued that vaping could be linked with a so - called «gateway effect» whereby young people who vape become addicted to nicotine and are thus more likely to transition to traditional cigarettes, others have said this doesn't make sense.

While Mathew Ingram over at GigaOm has argued that people have always found ways to distract themselves and waste time, perhaps by watching television, the reality is they've never had this sort of fire hose effect before.

So, with the obvious wide range of investment persona, it can certainly be argued that some people should have all of their money in bonds, while others should have little to none of their money in bonds.

Some people might argue that this is considerably low compared to other exchanges out there, while others might claim the maximum that's charged on credit card is a rip - off.

Dawkins argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of religious doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7» because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking person's mind.

The right would argue that it's God's will for absolute true to be preached to all people while the left would say that equality and compassion need to be the focus.

I would argue that many if not most people who call themselves Christians are gnostic theists, while most people who call themselves atheists are agnostic atheists.

While the big lie people in DC believe is that they can change the world on their own, Graham argued that changing their neighborhood — both locally and globally — is best attempted through the sustainable, Spirit - empowered work of a community of faith.

Standing under the word in prayer while waiting for the clarification of the Spirit will satisfy neither those who argue for «justice now» nor those for whom the faith itself is at stake in this issue — and those people will necessarily continue their professions and protestations.

These were of course poor precedents, since no clear - headed person had ever argued that women should not be ordained because being a woman was a sin, while many thoughtful people had noticed that the shift toward increasing tolerance of divorce had been at best sloppy and at worst downright unfaithful.

I heard a lot of «he's going to hell,» while I argued that «he's a better person now that he's being honest with himself and everyone around him.»

And while the little people are busy arguing about the color of someone's skin the big people are taking over.

Imagine a person who comes in here tonight and argues «no air exists» but continues to breathe air while he argues.

While some might argue that those who are not in relationship with their creator have lost that image, as is evidenced by what we may believe to be their obvious sin, many of us have come to another conclusion — that all people continue to bear the image of God in some sense.

Rosenzweig argues that while all peoples appealed to all three elements, only the ancient Jews saw a relation among these three» a relation in which man and God and world all lived in response to one another.

Lots of people will argue that it will be impossible to judge performance over time — and it may take a while before the markets will adjust to a new, more rational management approach — but we must take the risk and move in that direction.

† Christians do not really exist, they just pretend that they believe in God and argue with non-religious people while not knowing very much at all regarding Christianity or the meaning of the bible and disregarding half of what the bible says only to strongly vocalize their stance against the other half of the bible that is against things that they either do not understand or that do not affect them personally.

The book argues that American Christians face declining political influence, while their churches are in disarray: therefore they must focus on creating strong, faith - filled grass roots communities that love people on the ground, rather than interfere with politics.

From its initial announcement, the Peters Projection has been surrounded by controversy: in over 40 articles on the subject, cartographers have vigorously denounced a number of Peters's claims for the map, while he and his supporters have argued that his is the only world map that meets the concerns of people interested in social issues.

While some were arguing and yelling, in other cases people were writing thoughtful rebuttals.

He ignores the fact that in war you kill people and capture enemies, and then drops every context (while accusing Peikoff of that), and simply argues that we should not torture our enemies in war because it is (somehow) unethical — he offers no real argument as to why it is immoral, and only tries to make Peikoff look like a buffoon.

3:65 — O People of the Scripture, why do you argue about Abraham while the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed until after him?

While arguing the little people get nothing, or «time» will go on strike.

What I am arguing in this post is that while justification by faith alone is true, if this is as far as a person goes, while they may be justified, they have not understood the gospel.

You may argue that you are talking about people while I am not, but I have concerns for the people, the women, who will be forced to continue an untenable or forcibly - induced pregnancy if their only source of medical care is via the government; without choices, women are marginalized and powerless.

While this second group usually agrees that feeding the poor and defending the powerless will not «get them to heaven» they argue that getting people to heaven is not the only goal of the Gospel.

It's sad to see how we, as people, argue with each other over who owns the truth, while our reilious leaders sit back and laugh... Jesus, Moses, Mohammed, Budda all said that we should respect each other, and yet, we are all here saying who is right and who is not... I believe that we should stop using Religion as an excuse to force our own beliefs upon other people... Druids are offically a Religion, simply a different way to believe in God's work, in my opinion... good for them... oh..

The first person thinks we make God happy by what we do, while the second person argues that we make God happy by what we believe.

You're just like people who don't believe in unicorns, except you run around all day rubbing it in peoples» faces like it makes you a better person, and while people don't have the head to argue against you, secretly most people wish you would just shut up already.

While polls should never have an undue effect on someone's political or moral positions — as Robert Wuthnow convincingly argues in the most recent issue of First Things — this new poll does seem to reveal that an artificial consensus created by the elite of this country, and the relatively quiet response among the opposition, has not taken dramatic hold of the hearts and minds of ordinary people in this nation.

Greene was escorted from the game for waving a Confederate flag while standing in front of «several African American people» during the national anthem, but argued that he was just invoking the First Amendment and should have been allowed to stay.

Some people, while recognizing religion as a legitimate subject matter, maintain that religion is basically «caught» but not «taught,» thus arguing against inclusion of courses in religion in the curriculum.

When you argue in a message forum, re-read the persons post while you are replying so you don't let your imagination change what the person said into what you think he said or hope he said.

In the book Why I Am Not a Feminist, author Jessa Crispin argues that safety is «a surface - level cleanliness» in that safety looks like a city bragging about how and clean it is while jails are filled with marginalized people who have been criminalized by punitive laws.

Justin says that, too often, outspoken Christians on the traditional side give the impression that the Bible supports hostility toward LGBT people, while pro-gay advocates reinforce this assumption by arguing that the only way to treat LGBT people with respect is to throw out the Bible altogether.

Two of the people I spoke with named J.J. Watt, Von Miller and Khalil Mack as the only defensive players who can move the spread while another representative specifically singled out Watt, arguing he could be worth as much as 1.5 points.

We don't have a true CDM with the engine to cover the necessary ground alone; Ramsey, while he has scored goals, hasn't remotely played as well as he did last year; and not a single person would argue that Santi / Mesut have hit the heights.

Whenever the topic of rookie of the year comes up, the first thing people who argue for Ben Simmons will bring up is that Simmons is fifth in the league in assists at 8 per game, while Donovan Mitchell only averages 3.6 per game.

while i can definitely get behind curbing consumption every day, (which, like you said is the point), i read something recently that made me rethink buy nothing day: http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=4014 it argues that buy nothing day is a day for priviledged white people to assuage their guilt about their own over-consumption while simultaneously looking down on lower - income people who may not be able to afford to pass up those black friday doorbusters.

While some people may argue, there are some pluses to having a baby when you still have an infant at home, such as:

being upset about hearing arguing or people talking in a harsh voice with other family members while nursing

Attempting to develop more cultural diversity caused one parent to complain that the district was not serving «American food,» while another argued that the food was «too much what the people in Los Angeles look like.»

Some people say that unique names are best, while others will argue for tried and true baby names.