«
Why at the time of crisis would you move HIDTA from its position of prominence and bring it into the Justice Department, where we don't know what will happen?»
Not exact matches
It seems bizarre that the most reasonable understanding
of why the 2008 bank
crisis did not require a vast public subsidy for Wall Street occurred
at Monday's Republican presidential debate on June 13, by none other than Congressional Tea Party leader Michele Bachmann — who had boasted in a Wall Street Journal interview two days earlier, on Saturday, that she voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) «both
times.»
Every
time I pick up my kids from school only to discover that they've been chowing down on brownies or chocolate - covered Oreos or candy (which seems to happen
at least twice a week), I can't help but think: In the midst
of an obesity
crisis,
why are other people being allowed to shovel my kids full
of unhealthy food
at school?
Yes, there has been some media coverage
of the people
at the sharp end
of London's housing
crisis but I have lost count
of the amount
of times I've heard people say things like «Well I can't afford to live in central London, so
why should they get to stay?».
He asked where Gordon Brown had been, and questioned
why the chancellor always seemed to «disappear»
at times of crisis, citing not only the current police probe, but the rebellion over trust schools and the vote on the war on Iraq.
It's not clear
why, but the buffering theory holds that people who enjoy close relationships with family and friends receive emotional support that indirectly helps to sustain them
at times of chronic stress and
crisis.
We know about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out
of 110
time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain far higher returns
at dramatically less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out
of this economic
crisis if we could share it with millions
of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending again and businesses could start hiring again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted arguments as to
why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions
of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion
of Buy - and - Hold.
But
why is this happening now
at this
time of crisis?
Why does the list not include economists like Amartya Sen
of Harvard University, also a Nobel prize winning economist whose career is devoted to promoting well - being particularly among the world's poor (he had an op - ed a couple
of days ago in the NY
Times re: the food
crisis); or Joseph Stiglitz
of Columbia University, also a former World Bank chief economist and Nobel prize winner who is critical
of the globalized free market apparatus run by the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO; or Herman Daley
of the University
of Maryland, also a former economist
at the World Bank whose career is devoted to developing a sustainable economy within the ecological constraints
of our environment.