Sentences with phrase «why carry any more weight»

Why carry any more weight or worry about change?

Not exact matches

Why do some Christians feel their arguments carry more weight if they sound like The Mighty Thor?
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
why do those verses carry any more weight than any found in the Bible?
Throughout, Holben tactfully withholds his own opinion: «Why should my judgment carry more weight than that of the many advocates of the various viewpoints I have quoted?»
Why would it not make more sense to invest in a handful of these heavyweights instead of also having to carry the weight of the other 450 (some of which are mostly just baggage)?
The second factor why a revolving loan carries more weight in your credit score than an installment loan, is because a revolving loan changes the amount due month after month.
And this is why CERN is necessary - because it carries a bit more weight in scientific matters - and they are working to understand the unknown mechanisms of how 10 micron particles nucleate from smaller particles (and nucleate from smaller particles they obviously do, how much cosmic rays affect that is unknown).
This would carry a lot more weight if those explaining why the climate is as it is, actually knew what the climate is with any accuracy.
Can your explain why your unsupported opinion carries more weight compared to a few people I quoted: — the CEO of a major gas & electric utility — a geoscientist who ran the British equivalent of MIT and was later Chairman of Shell — and a Nobel physicist / Stanford professor?
Can I take it you don't intend to answer us as to why your opinions carry more weight on this topic than the people I mentioned?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z