Sentences with phrase «why liberal and conservative»

Shows how and why liberals and conservatives managed to find common ground and align against the teacher unions to implement the testing everyone hates.

Not exact matches

That is why I have concerns, whether it is the Liberals or the Conservatives who are trying to take credit for a system developed over generations as a result of Canadians saying we need to support these standards and ensure they stay in place.

Polls tell us why Trudeau could seek Mulroney's counsel with impunity: A recent Pew Research survey found an almost identical 82 per cent of Liberals and 83 per cent of Conservatives in Canada support NAFTA, compared with 68 per cent of Democrats and just 30 per cent of Republicans in the U.S.

Just curious, why does there always have to be a «right» and «left», «conservative», and «liberal.»

Presuming all that is the case for the moment, musn't the Founderist Conservative account for why liberals came to dominate American academia, and let's thrown in American journalism, too, in the first place?

That's why you have ultra liberal and ultra conservative denominations..

Best Profiles: Yonat Shimron with «Ellen Davis Unearths an Agrarian View of the Bible» and Robert Long with «Christian, Not Conservative: Why Marilynne Robinson's literary — and liberal — Calvinism appeals»

With all of the exciting challenges and new tools to meet them in this wonderful world of ours, I can't understand why anyone would want to spend their life in a time warp, the 50's for the conservatives and the 60's for the liberals.

A Generous Orthodoxy: Why I am a missional, evangelical, post / protestant, liberal / conservative, mystical / poetic, biblical, charismatic / contemplative,... anabaptist / anglican, metho (emergentYS) by Brian McLaren — Brian McLaren has, obviously, been influential in my life through his work and writings.

I have been told over and over that the conservatives don't believe in Jesus WHY because Jesus was a liberal.

Why do liberal states have higher unemployment and higher debts than conservative states?

If liberals can reconcile candidate Obama (a fierce idealist) with president Obama (George Bush with a new haircut), then I don't see why conservatives can't reconcile Jesus and Ayn Rand.

Disarming Scripture: Cherry - Picking Liberals, Violence - Loving Conservatives, and Why We All Need to Learn to Read the Bible Like Jesus Did by Derek Flood

Yet this very analysis of why conservative churches are growing assumes the presumptions of liberal social theory and practice that I am suggesting is the source of our difficulty.

Why have many social critics and reformers, including both conservatives and liberals, found fault with the ideals of Martin Luther King, Jr.?

Any time there is an offering taken up at work, a freind is in need, someone's moving and needs a couple buddies to go over and help out, potluck luncheons, anything... be it actual money or just time / food, every single time without exception those freinds who are conservative and / or religious are the ones who show up to contribute and every single time the liberal and / or non-believer friends just show up with an excuse as to why they're not giving or didn't bring something or couldn't help that weekend.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have demanded the government explains why counter-terrorism resources for Pakistan are being cut.

«What Nick will need to do as deputy prime minister is to show what a difference the Liberal Democrats have made and why a majority for either Conservatives or Labour at the election would be a disaster,» blog Lib Dem Voice quoted him as saying.

Now, based on above views, you can see why conservatives would not be on board with US government using «mental health» as a criteria on whom to deny guns - and based on # 1, any fair - minded rational liberal should be as well.

And it would present an open goal for the Conservatives against Labour (indeed, for the Liberal Democrats against Labour as well — why take the harder target?).

That's why the «good news» that Britain is out of recession once again is nowhere near as good as Conservative and Liberal Democrats would like.

That is why at our conference, instead of trying to create some artificial dividing lines between Liberal Democrat policy and Conservative policy, my message will be: if you want rid of Gordon Brown and the big brother state, and if you care about our schools, our quality of life and our liberties, then join us in one national movement that can bring real change.

Tim Montgomerie of ConservativeHome thinks that was over-egging the pudding, and Jackie Ashley reckons that Clegg is still struggling to find a distinctive tone in which he can both defend his role within the government and also explain why people should go for the Liberal Democrats over the Conservatives.

It is not clear why tech companies would be shocked that products they aggressively marketed to conservative and liberal campaigns would be used to elect Republicans.

London Mayor Boris Johnson recently added his voice to demands for gay weddings while at the Gay Pride festival in London saying: «If the Conservatives and Liberals can get together in a national coalition and settle their differences, I don't see why you can't have gay marriage».

What is more, democratically speaking why should these people have their votes counted again and again while Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat supporters only get their vote counted once?

It is a peculiar logic to suggest that a Conservative party donor is the reason why a Liberal Democrat cabinet member in this department and a Liberal Democrat as chief secretary should support the proposal.»

Here's why: The traditional role of the Liberal (now almost defunct) and the Conservative Party in New York has been to influence the positions of the two major parties on a variety of issues.

I'll explain in detail next week why this is so, both from the Conservative and Liberal Democrat points of view, and why it's an error to presume that the only options at the next election are the status quo or an electoral pact.

In this Policy Forum, Randall Hansen and Shalini Randeria discuss the different ideological viewpoints of liberals and conservatives in Europe with respect to accepting refugees, highlighting why — even though the continent is not bearing the «brunt» of the refugee crisis — it remains «in the center of a political and social storm» related to refugees asylum.

«And given how heated we are as a country in terms of political discourse, I figured well, why wouldn't there be a site for conservative and liberal politics?&raqAnd given how heated we are as a country in terms of political discourse, I figured well, why wouldn't there be a site for conservative and liberal politics?&raqand liberal politics?»

Sharpton, a liberal Democrat, and Gingrich, a conservative Republican, joined Education Secretary Arne Duncan on the first stop of a «listening and learning» tour to find out which school strategies are working and why.

As many liberals and conservatives push for national academic standards and other centralizing education reforms, this situation brilliantly illustrates why government schooling is totally antithetical to a free society, and why the more centralized the power, the greater the danger.

Why do these movements draw support from both liberals and conservatives?

Why is it that conservatives and liberals are so far apart when ensuring a successful educational system is one thing we should all agree on?

Chris Mooney, in his recent book, The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science — and Reality explores some of the differences in the psychology and reasoning between American liberals and conservatives.

Conservatives, moderates and independents often wonder why their liberal friends sound sooo stooopid: the answer is K - R - U-G-M-A-N, and other chattering idiot - elites who live and breathe stupidity for their readers, viewers and listeners from the major MSM outlets.

I think we can accept that peoples political position influences their views on AGW, there seems to be a high correlation between conservative politics and having a denialist perspective, and also between liberal politics and having an alarmist perspective, but why?

Suffice it to say that my political positions are closer to his than those of the most liberal justices, and that's why I wouldn't want to suggest that conservative judges would be more likely to defend unreasonable outcomes such as the damages award in this Apple v. Samsung case.

Plus: Noteworthy interview with Harvard lawprof Duncan Kennedy, of Critical Legal Studies fame [Tor Krever, Carl Lisberger and Max Utzschneider, Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left] And: «Why Are There So Few Conservative / Libertarian Law Profs, Even Though They Are More Productive Than Liberal Law Profs?&raqand Max Utzschneider, Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left] And: «Why Are There So Few Conservative / Libertarian Law Profs, Even Though They Are More Productive Than Liberal Law Profs?&raqAnd: «Why Are There So Few Conservative / Libertarian Law Profs, Even Though They Are More Productive Than Liberal Law Profs?»

A study reported in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology recently summarized in an article in Vox found that pretty much everyone — liberals and conservatives alike — will do a lot to avoid even finding out what their opponents think or why they think it.

Given that fact, liberals and conservatives alike argue, why not drop the pretense of apolitical judges and support or oppose nominees on the basis of their party label or ideology?