Sentences with phrase «why points of course»

Why points of course!

Not exact matches

Of course, with debt in 2016 rising by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growtOf course, with debt in 2016 rising by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growtof GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growtof assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growtof GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growth.

I even find myself a little mystified by why it was such a big deal back in the day, telling myself, «Well, of course they were going to reconcile at some point, and in certain strategic and economy terms they already had, so why the big fuss?

Perhaps for the less cerebral, you'd like to explain just what David's point was and of course in a non-interpretive manner, which leads one to this conclusion: Why do we need David, you will suffice.

And my point about the sun stopping, is that it was something that happened once, thousands of years ago, and it is certainly possible that no one wrote anything down about, with of course the exception that it was recorded in the Bible And when I said the latter, I mean the second of the two things you thought I might be talking about And I was asking who you meant when you said you didn't understand why he didn't kill everyone but Joshua.

That, of course, is why the services of Judas and a secret nighttime move are required to arrest Jesus — the point where the Gibson film begins.

Of course it didn't but my point is to suggest some other - than - mind - washing, manipulative alternative to your frustrating with «The Church» and why it is your series is (to use your word) frustrating to me.

Which is why, of course, as you point out, it is silly to pray for something good to happen if we are unwilling to life a finger to help it take place.

Of course, at that point, we see the Guinness team in the old struggle of not knowing exactly why you scanned it (except that you'd been drinking Guinness): «Hey, tweet iOf course, at that point, we see the Guinness team in the old struggle of not knowing exactly why you scanned it (except that you'd been drinking Guinness): «Hey, tweet iof not knowing exactly why you scanned it (except that you'd been drinking Guinness): «Hey, tweet it!

I do argue we are richer than Liv / Tot the fact we have outperformed them over the course of recent season is why we are not under - achieving that is entirely the point.

From the perspective of S&P + averages, the SEC barely held onto the top spot (which is why this countdown is previewing ACC teams right now and not SEC teams yet), but if you get points for winning the national title, the Heisman, and of course the Piesman, the ACC gets the nod.

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

yep and @ozgunner and @rkw i do nt see why it angers and agitates you so much when i insult fans who abuse wenger, look i am not the kind of naive guy who thinks everybody should be nice to eachother of course that would be nice, but when i hate some opinions of some people i do get annoyed a lot of times and i do show it and its truth i am not a supporter of the belief that one has to respect all opinions equally because i am firm believer that there are dump opinions for example when a conservative talks about homophob things i am pretty sure that i will insult him and some will say its wrong and will say its right its your opinion but back to your point..

This is of course a good reason why boards do not usually include fans; though I know there are always exceptions but my point stands.

But as Sue rightly points out why lose another top player for free.Unless of course his demands are too high and we can replace with better.

Of course questions need to be addressed - most notably, how on earth we managed to exhaust a ten point lead and turn it into a five point deficit and why some of our best players appear to have been physically bankrupt through overuse - but this will have to wait for the warmer monthOf course questions need to be addressed - most notably, how on earth we managed to exhaust a ten point lead and turn it into a five point deficit and why some of our best players appear to have been physically bankrupt through overuse - but this will have to wait for the warmer monthof our best players appear to have been physically bankrupt through overuse - but this will have to wait for the warmer months.

The first time I went to London, I made a point of looking up Paddington and why yes of course I went to Paddington Station.

Again, we don't all agree on where that balance point is, which is why we have this blog, so we can discuss it, in a peaceful way of course.

Of course, they do (unless you're into force - feeding), but there's where Ryan's handy point about why there are no picky eaters in Uganda comes into play.

Of course you would need to phase it in gradually, which is why Vince Cable's proposal would be a good starting point.

It is this bandwagon effect that helps explain why support for the government increased by ten points over the course of the campaign, rather than going to minor parties — as has been the case elsewhere.

«Why are people dying, and can we intervene at some point in a way that might reverse the course of that increased risk?»

My point, of course, is that while it's important to be secure, it's equally important to ask why — and to consider the trade - off between security and convenience.

And of course, this point out one of the reasons why it's massively glycogen depleting.

Of course, drinking milk and orange juice at the same time will also point out why you should know your acids from your bases.

Roger pointed it out as he usually does, (that's why I love him, he's so acute, and he's a cutie) of course I didn't want to expose the fact that he had just inspired this blog post or made my mind explode and me look at my new Tibi skirt (which I kind of secretly saved up for but acted like I got for Christmas) in an entirely new light... why couldn't I have just found an amazing black vintage poodle skirt at the Goodwill and saved $ 400?

Ronit is asked at one point why she isn't married, and while her response rankles, it's understood as a matter of course.

Of course, the film had been streaming for free on Google Plus for weeks at that point, so it's not entirely clear why the theatrical engagement happened in the first place.

It's not that there wasn't time, either, over the course of these five hours, to address obvious misunderstandings and obscurities (why, for instance, doesn't everyone always cast the «kill» spell, since it seems pretty effective), as there was certainly enough time to pack in a horse - cart full of characters pointing to their chests and weepily declaring that their dead pals will «always be right here.»

Of course all critic reviews are personal preference, so I don't see why a couple of comments here point that ouOf course all critic reviews are personal preference, so I don't see why a couple of comments here point that ouof comments here point that out.

Underscored by Marcus's visit to an actress's apartment (her wall of photos a dedication to her career in... why, pictures, of course) and then to her son, who's living with a beautiful transvestite, gender is a slippery thing in Argento, charges of misogyny being something he's had difficulty dodging to the point of appearing at the end to concede.

University of New England used exit surveys to actually have a look at those «walking points» and to find out the real reasons why students were leaving their courses and walking away from a career in teaching.

An introductory - level course that would provide an overview of the key points of EMMA, and help learners understand why market analysis is such an important step during an emergency situation.

Of course, when we had to make a few three - point turns navigating some hairpins, I started to question why this FX4 package was available on the Max models.

Of course, it's one thing to brag about everything Thompson Chrysler Jeep Dodge RAM has to offer drivers from Baltimore, Towson, Glen Burnie, Laurel and Parkville, MD; it's something completely different to actually show you ourselves.That's why we invite you to see us in person at 124 North Point Blvd Baltimore, Maryland today.

Market penetration will be huge, which is why Apple's stock jumped at the announcement of the price (of course, Apple probable leaking a $ 1000 price point to the WSJ a few weeks back helped with the price wow - power today).

After making the point that saving regularly can add up to significant sums over the course of a career, you can then show why a 401 (k)-- with its tax - breaks, automatic payroll deductions and, often, employer matching funds — is an ideal mechanism to pull off such a long - term savings regiment.

Of course, you can use your Membership Reward points to buy gift cards, pay your credit card balance, shop, etc., but if you do use it for travel, you will see why it's more than worth the annual fee.

This is why Titan offer flight upgrades at competitive prices, good value airport lounge access, and of course the famous complimentary VIP door - to - door travel service which allows customers to be collected from their own front door and driven to their departure point *.

Of course, you can also spend more than 25,000 points on just one flight, which is why it's important to choose your redemptions wisely.

Of course I would never use my hard - earned cash on this $ 8,000 flight, that's why I burn points.

Of course, people will argue that is the point of Pokémon, the grinding to get your team in tip top condition but why then, do so many people use programs like Pokémon Showdown to play competitively without the hasslOf course, people will argue that is the point of Pokémon, the grinding to get your team in tip top condition but why then, do so many people use programs like Pokémon Showdown to play competitively without the hasslof Pokémon, the grinding to get your team in tip top condition but why then, do so many people use programs like Pokémon Showdown to play competitively without the hassle?

Of course it will outsell it at this point, why make such a big story / deal about it.

Of course, that is the part of the record we know best, but since the proxys follow the instrumental curve in the validation period we have some confidence in them, and since, as Tamino points out, the more proxys we add the more confident we can be, and we can even take a bunch out and get more or less the same behavior, why yes, there is a probleOf course, that is the part of the record we know best, but since the proxys follow the instrumental curve in the validation period we have some confidence in them, and since, as Tamino points out, the more proxys we add the more confident we can be, and we can even take a bunch out and get more or less the same behavior, why yes, there is a probleof the record we know best, but since the proxys follow the instrumental curve in the validation period we have some confidence in them, and since, as Tamino points out, the more proxys we add the more confident we can be, and we can even take a bunch out and get more or less the same behavior, why yes, there is a problem.

Yet, when challenged, Prof. Curry demurrs that none of these reflect her personal opinion but were rather points that Montford made in his book, on which, of course, she has no opinion, but since gavin and tamino chose to rag on the rich dish she put on their plate, why, of course, Montford must be right.

They can't, of course, explain precisely why this point should not be discussed or addressed, at least not rationally.

Though not of course necessarily to Paris policy supremos advised by the current set of climate cronies, which is why Steve McIntyre's point about the stipulated process for a «highly influential» scientific assessment must also apply.

But the point, of course, is that a poor result can still give some useful information and by examining why the result is poor, you can improve.

Of course, because this is a family dispute, the facts are mostly allegations at this point, though the husband has gone on US national TV to explain why he broke into his wife's email account.