Sentences with phrase «why use a clause»

Not exact matches

That's why there hasn't been a single case of a Canadian company using the National Treatment clause on an IPR issue with the United States since NAFTA.

Clause 4 has two elements to it - the spirit it invokes which is why the term is used loosely now to describe pivotal moments; and the letter of it in the sense of constitutions being rewritten.

The Model Contract not only contains a sample contract that magazines can use, but also glosses each clause so writers can understand what rights are affected and why they matter.

Democrats have pointed to the use of the agreement as an example of why a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule banning mandatory arbitration clauses should stand.

Or, more directly, why would they use different wording in two adjacent clauses?

She gave five reasons in particular why the scope of the exclusion clause should not be limited to the offenses outlined in Article 1 FDCT: firstly the wording refers to acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN and is not limited to terrorist offenses; secondly, such an interpretation would be at odds with the Geneva Convention in light of which the Qualification Directive should be interpreted; thirdly, the Qualification Directive as an instrument of asylum and humanitarian law and the FDCT are qualitatively different and derive from different areas of law; fourthly, it would unduly restrict the application of the exclusion clause and finally, fifthly, the fact that the FDCT is an instrument of variable geometry with varying application across the Union would lead to problems if it were used as criteria in defining terms for the purposes of the application of the Qualification Directive.

Use customized arbitration clauses, says DiCarlo, and explains clearly in two pages why they are so flexible and effective.

That is why we have seized an unmissable opportunity to work with and learn from Clause, a legaltech startup that is pioneering the use of smart legal contracts.

The deal autopsy should include a road map of each significant clause in the contract, or issue that was addressed by the parties during negotiations, stating the starting positions of each party, their respective interests, the compromises that they made and why, the business reasons used to support their positions and their concessions, and a business description of the agreed outcomes, and a business description of what the contract is trying to state, and why.

In my view, however, it is misguided and hypocritical, not to mention illustrative of why the notwithstanding clause should never be used.

That is why I mentioned at the tail - end of my story that from thence onward I advocated for the use of (and from day one when I re entered the business as a Realtor) the wording»... at the buyer's sole discretion...» be included within the framework of «any» conditions / clauses inserted for the benefit of buyers» fiduciary interests.

Tell me why we would use a clause that invites conflict.

I have often wondered why professional REALTORS have not moved to COA (conditional on appraisal) clauses to replace our commonly used COF.

This is why I confidently told my agent that she could not even entertain using (or accepting) such a clause.