Sentences with phrase «why would test»

Why would test scores improve when large numbers of experienced teachers retire?

The only reason why you would test something, is to find out an answer.

AP: That's exactly where I was going, which is why we have test stores today where we will literally go out and put development teams, people who are writing code, into a store, at a table, and they will go through several reviews of code while sitting with the sales associates and the customers, as we're getting feedback on capabilities, and stuff like that.

A Department for Education spokesman said: «Parents rightly expect their children to leave primary school having mastered the basics of literacy and numeracy, and that is why we have tests at the end of Key Stage 2.

That's why they have tests in the first place... idiot.

Why have tests if you don't do anything with the results?

Not exact matches

Live by the tried - and - true test: You should never have to use the bcc line in email, and if you feel you do, ask yourself why.»

That's why my own drug - testing company has created processes and policies to help make each customer's experience more than a mere transaction.

That's partly why UPS in February tested an experimental delivery truck that had a recharging station for drones used for deliveries.

Don't miss: Why Gen Z responds differently to the success - predicting «Marshmallow Test» than you would have

Although no test can guarantee success, Eyvazzadeh nonetheless offers what is perhaps the ultimate recommendation: «I have had many cases where patients have struggled, they don't know why, I do the test, and they have a baby.»

That's one of the reasons why Amazon has been testing drone deliveries in other countries like Canada and the Netherlands.

Why He's One to Watch: Alder, 27, has won $ 200,000 at collegiate business - plan competitions, and he is partnering with Descente, a sports gear company, on a product field test.

Dr. Laub's work has been tested with over 1200 organizations, and continues to be at the forefront of research to answer the question «why do leadership structures fail so often?»

But with some hindsight we can understand why they made the decision to launch the new product, and ditch the «classic» version they had built the company around, because taste tests showed that consumers wanted a sweeter flavor comparable to what Coke's rival, Pepsi, was offering.

I am interested in testing the new brownies in the Denver area... I know that my customers would buy the brownies, because I have so many ask about why we do not have them.

If you haven't done any A / B split tests yet, why is that so?

That's why he spent $ 50 million of his own money developing the prototypes and testing them in Third World villages, and they work, and we have to get the word out because 50 percent of all human illness is caused by waterborne pathogens.

Why would I even bother testing out something else?

[00:08] Introduction [02:50] Tony introduces Ray Dalio [05:30] Ray's upbringing and early life [06:00] The first stock he bought [07:00] Getting hooked on the market [07:30] Why he wants to share his secrets now [08:15] The three stages of life [08:45] Finding joy in helping others achieve success [09:15] Creating principles in life [09:45] Why his new book is a recipe book [10:45] The two things you need to be successful [11:10] You have to stress test your ideas [11:50] The power of making mistakes [14:00] Public humiliation in 1982 [15:30] The most painful experience became the most powerful [15:50] Learning to ask: «How do I know I'm right?»

The chain initially announced the $ 1 Craving test in January, noting then that if the $ 1 Cravings menu goes national, it would replace the «Why Pay more» menu.

KRIS 6 news has reached out to the Tsunami Warning Center in Alaska to try to find out why these alerts were sent to phones, and why they weren not declared a test.

The Internet loves animals and they would also like to know why Johnson & Johnson tests its products on furry little creatures.

This is why you may have a harder time sticking to your goals at the end of the day, after you've already been putting your willower to the test all day long.

Baidu and other autonomous driving technology developers testing vehicles on public roads in California have had to release more details as to why thei...

There is a strong legal argument for why some of the tokens that have come after BTC are not securities, but many other tokens that have popped up over the past 18 months look more like a security as defined by the Howey Test.

Test cricket's naming sponsor Magellan — having forced us to meet Marcus and his truly global world (Dutch beer, German trainers, Californian watch, Scottish dog, Swiss coffee) but, sadly, only Australian equities in his investment portfolio, right before Hamish Douglass paid $ 140 million for John Sevior's Australian - only equities portfolio — walked away faster than The NT News could verbal Cameron Bancroft into the infamous apologia, «Why I've Got Some Sticky Near My Dicky.»

Why didn't they entitle the chart with something more positive such as, «Being Asian Can Get You A Lower Mortgage Rate,» or «Although Asians Need Higher Grades And Test Scores To Have The Same Chance To Get Into University, At Least Asians Get To Pay Lower Mortgage Rates,» or «Despite Some Disadvantages Of Being A Minority, You Can Still Get The Best Mortgage Rate Possible,» or «Being A Minority May Make It Easier To Get A Better Rate.»

This is why any willingness to accept risk will far more tied to our longstanding measures of market action and other testable factors than to some novel «Bernanke faith factor» that we have no way of testing historically in any kind of rigorous manner.

To understand why, you have to understand the test's origins.

Lastly, The Odyssee has withstood the test of time longer than your puny bible, I think it's time we go back to that story, because its older so it must have more significance AND must be truer, I mean, why would it still be around if it wasn't true chad?

He also thinks that corporations are people, although he has yet to explain why corporations can't cough, have their temperature checked, undergo a prostate exam / mammogram, or have any other medical test done to it.

It also tells us taking hings on faith is a really good way to be wrong which is why we have these extensive testing and verification and review criteria in the scientific method.

It's an example of why to certain believers the reason why we are placed into this world of such trials and sufferings that it is because this life on Earth is a testing period to see if we are going to follow God not because we are obligated to having full knowledge but due to our own free will through relying on faith.

Unless your faith has been picked apart and stress - tested to the max by the most articulate, brilliant, and well - spoken of critics and skeptics, and still emerge from the fire intact, we may not even know why we believe what we believe in.

Why then is it so hard and almost never coming for those who sit in a hierarchy that Jesus never established (Luke 22:24 - 26) and who also set up «litmus tests» for excommunicating «heretics» (subtly administered in the following way»... maybe it would be better if you would find yourself a church that believes more like you do...») to repent and change the order of their churches?

Why can't we just say that God tests us with suffering for a perfectly good and loving reason, and we just have no idea what this reason could be?

Why would God «lead» us into temptation or «put us to the test» to begin with?

On judgement day god will ask and why don't you think women are worthy and at that moment they will know they have failed the test.

Why would the same god that ignored their far more desperate prayers answer your trivial prayer for an «A» on a calculus test or to win a football game?

If I don't see the sync, then I don't try to decode the sector header, because I don't really know where the sector decoding process should really start.So I really have to focus on why I'm not seeing the SYNC's, and try to improve that, and then worry about the DATA later.Now don't get me wrong, I'm pretty excited about seeing the valid data!And maybe by using a better test file, I might be able to determine WHY the SYNC's are not being read properwhy I'm not seeing the SYNC's, and try to improve that, and then worry about the DATA later.Now don't get me wrong, I'm pretty excited about seeing the valid data!And maybe by using a better test file, I might be able to determine WHY the SYNC's are not being read properWHY the SYNC's are not being read properly.

Now why God would insist that we believe a particular quizzical story in the complete absence of proof, and make that the fundamental test of our existence, defies all explanation.

This sort of empirical testing is very tricky indeed, which undoubtedly explains why so little work has been done in just this area.

Why is it not OK for Jeff to ask very outspoken, self - proclaimed Christian candidates about their views, especially since Michelle Bachmann has made it clear she has litmus tests for judges she would nominate?

Why has it taken fourteen months for the results of the DNA test in the Emanuela Orlandi investigation?

What should have been a simple transaction turns into a Sisyphean test of wills, in which the rep demands to know why he's being left and refuses to take an answer.

Acts 15:10 «10 Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?»

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

And then we have the audacity to ask why they don't perform better on tests.

Here we have known methods of life on this planet that we have studied and observed to come to an evolutionary conclusion for part of the origins of life (the manual transmission) and then you have your theory of a prime mover, a universal creator (the flux capacitor if you will), which can not be tested, can not be seen, can not be heard, can not be felt by any known testing methods and yet you want to say «Hey, why havn't you learned to drive the flux capacitor transmission yet?