Sentences with phrase «why would the creators»

But why would the creator of life require the blood sacrifice of the one perfect man in order for God to be able to accept us.

Why would a creator also include defects, disease, retardation, etc. etc..

Why would the creators choose to show blood only this time, when it is a relatively minor injury compared to the many others that have been depicted?

Not exact matches

«It's the cornerstone of why we've been able to build these businesses with creators.»

It shows why, if given the chance, we'd never build the Internet we have now: As a centralized advertising economy that strips wealth from creators, and feeds personal data to giant corporations.

When asked why the Redstones decided to keep Paramount Pictures, which Dauman had tried to sell, Shari Redstone described a vision of turning the studio into a creator of all kinds of content, not just films.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

«you have no proof of the latter» Perhaps that is why the signers of the Declaration of Independence preferred to say our unique design by the creator was self evident.

We all have to «fee will» which is gift from the Creator of heavens, earth and everything btwn them... and which is why we all say whatever we want to say and we do whatever we want to do... and its not like a law of state i.e. driving with high speed in a lower speed limit will get u a ticket and points in ur dl...

That is illogical, so why is it illogical to assume that the universe and human beings and animals which are way more complex than a car has a creator?

As to why, I would think the creator of the universe had his reasons.

Do fundamentalists ever use their reasoning ability an wonder why God, the creator of the Universe, would make such laws and demands on the inhabitants of this small, insignificant planet revolving in this vast solar system, traveling in this vast galaxy, floating through this endless universe?

HOW CAN U EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT OF A CREATION WITHOUT A CREATOR!??? And because of this unwillingness to accept TRUTH, they themselves have shut out from their minds additional «knowledge» that would eventually lead to the explanation of WHY humanity was created in the first place!

«That supernatural cause could not itself have a cause, because infinite causal chains do not exist «Well, even if we accept your appeal to mysticism, why could your god not itself have a creator.

You don't have to deal with ignorant people who can't understand how and why you're not out raping, murdering and robbing since they can't grasp that a person can have the ability to do good without some belief in a creator god.

Why would the all powerful creator of everything set aside a tiny rock in the universe just to play a sadistic version of the bachelor?

Reject all Islam all U want here in this earth but my sweethearts when we stand infront of the one and only god on the day of judgement, I want u to know that you will be like why did i fall into the twisting words of Satan and mix the creator as one who urinates and has reproduced.

But modern man, perhaps a little intoxicated with his success in answering the hows of life, will frequently not commit himself until his whys are answered — in fact, until the Creator has taken him into his full confidence!

Why would God, creator of everything, need blood sacrifice?

Why don't the people who have been blessed to believe in our creator Christians muslims and jews see the similarities between us Have you been so institutionalised as to only see what differences there are Will it mean anything on the lasthave been blessed to believe in our creator Christians muslims and jews see the similarities between us Have you been so institutionalised as to only see what differences there are Will it mean anything on the lastHave you been so institutionalised as to only see what differences there are Will it mean anything on the last day

Why does expansion imply a creator, as you've claimed?

Why would I believe that old men in prada slippers and lace dresses have the ear of god, let alone speak for the creator?

Why not any of the hundreds of other creator gods, or the god of some aliens living in a distant galaxy that we've never heard of before?

You honestly have no idea why religion, any religion, was created and the purpose of each creator.

You have no scientific proof to discredit a creator, so why not respect someone else's hypothesis, instead of being pretentious.

I see this to be a non-argument because I don't see why you think the creator would be unable to act prior to our definition of time to be in place.

Why do you think that if the universe needed a creator that it would be your god?

Both skeptics and believers have wondered why an omnipotent Creator would allow the universe to unfold so ponderously and in such a long, drawn - out evolutionary manner.

I always wondered why creator of everything that exists would mandate same gender relations?

And, about the killings, assume for a moment that God in the old testament is the only God of the universe, the creator and wanted their creations to live in His love (that's why we're created) and He's in charge of where the souls of every human beings would end up when they die.

Here we have known methods of life on this planet that we have studied and observed to come to an evolutionary conclusion for part of the origins of life (the manual transmission) and then you have your theory of a prime mover, a universal creator (the flux capacitor if you will), which can not be tested, can not be seen, can not be heard, can not be felt by any known testing methods and yet you want to say «Hey, why havn't you learned to drive the flux capacitor transmission yet?

Why does God the Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth (and words) of all that is seen and unseen have to quote His own stuff?

The more we're able to explain human behavior in terms of molecular genetics or brain activity or biological function — absent a Creator — then the more questions I have about what I believe, and why.

There seems to be little to gain by speculating what Joseph thought about why he had to travel to Bethlehem for the census or if the Magi picked up their gifts in the market on the way over to the stable, in comparison to the great mystery of the Creator of the cosmos taking on human form in order to save us from the fires of Hell and restore us to how we were created to be, let alone «considering afresh the Holy Incarnation».

Even in Middle - eastern culture, there are still many white people, so although it is unlikely for him to have appeared as a «white person», it's still not improbable, it does however contradict the cynic principles in Christianity, as they define him by what they believe would constitute their creator as being great or perfect as a manifestation equal to his greatness, but this was the exact mistake the Jews made, and why they disregarded Jesus when he came in the Flesh, his appearance can be debated on, but just like his birthday, or day of death.

Why can't you stand up for your bible and explain how some of those other verses could have possibly come from the Creator of the Universe?

And if so, why wouldn't logic allow for the universe to have always existed if you allow for the creator to always exist?

Why would Atheist get mad if God / creator does not exist?

The most plausible is a Creator... and why would it be so full ofholes?

Aware of series creator Matthew Weiner's fetish for prop - selection, and aware of the star status of costume designer Janie Bryant, viewers feel challenged to nail down why the creative geniuses have put onscreen the things they put onscreen.

A lot of the country hears almost nothing of what the center - right has to say and what they do hear in nonsense about job creators who really did «build that» and some bromides about «opportunity» that were unmoored from anything in their own lives What they have never heard is a pithy explanation about why any policy would make their lives better.

You said, «I've never understood why it is more rational to think everything comes from nothing than to believe there is a Creator.»

I've never understood why it is more rational to think everything comes from nothing than to believe there is a Creator.

Why the Creator should have preferred to reach His goal by a process, instead of going straight to it, these modern theologians do not tell us.

It is the combination of these theological hypotheses that leads to the rhetorical question as to why this creator would have taken over 10 billion years simply setting the stage for the only part of the process in which something truly important is occurring.

Because nonhuman animals are not, by hypothesis, capable of developing such virtues, it is hard to see why a creator who is both omnipotent and benevolent would make them so susceptible to pain (insofar as warning devices are needed, omnipotence could have fashioned nonpainful ones, as pointed out in the book Catch 22).

If we didn't evolve, then why did your oh - so - brilliant creator endow us with an organ that has little - to - no benefit, is entirely unnecessary, but occassionally kills?

He has failed to grasp (and therefore properly instruct) why our Creator, Jehovah God, has permitted suffering to continue for over 6000 years of human history since Adam violated God's command.

@Clinton: Why does there have to be a «creator?»

@Religions «If the founding fathers believe that the god of Israel was real why would they use the term Creator?»