Sentences with phrase «wild ass guess»
But my guess is, and this is just a wild ass guess, there will be a very strong correlation to belief in fairy tales among those that don't accept it.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
Wild assed guess, no explanation necessary -LRB-
To make a long story short, and this is really a WAGNER (wild assed guess, no explanation required) what if the large amounts of SO2 injected into the northern hemisphere atmosphere by WWII and the unrestrained coal burning (see London, smog) produced huge amounts of sulfate aerosol which shadowed and cooled downwind rural measurement sites.
Max, we can show that Mann's work is garbage, Rahmstorf's «worse than we thought» relied on pretend data, Monnett's polar bear study is beyond stupid methodology, Briffa's magic tree, Jones» fake Chinese data, the SST wild ass guesses, the Steig Antarctic smear, the «quality» underlying Harry's Read Me, the repeated refusal by the hockey team to share data or engage in any transparency, and the underlying fraud of Climategate.
Many of us still operate on hunches, wild ass guesses and assumptions instead of the data that's available.
Not exact matches
Wild - ass - guessing!
[4](In fact, Dauphine refers specifically to Stallcup's wild - ass guess back - of - the - envelope calculation in her infamous «Apocalypse Meow» presentation.)
Because a SWAG is a «Scientific Wild - Assed Guess», so you better believe that it is backed up by a «consensus»...
Beyond that they are nothing better than unscientific wild - ass guesses.
Way too much of their research is based on «scientific wild - ass guesses».
An «estimate» and / or «reconstruction» of an annual or decadal temperature mean from data recorded only in June and July is just a «swag» (a scientific wild - ass guess).
No idea, but my first wild - assed guess is that it is going to be at least thousands of times the power output of the human race.
That would be you when you produce such rubbish as this: «the graphs, etc for absorption / transmission beyond 10 or 15 microns are at best just speculations, and at worst, just wild - assed guesses.
Personally, I am of the opinion that they are more wild - assed guesses than anything.
On the contrary they explicitly measure the absorption by oxygen, just in that region of the spectrum where you said it was a wild - assed guess.
The graphs, etc for absorption / transmission beyond 10 or 15 microns are at best just speculations, and at worst, just wild - assed guesses.
Personally, I am of the opinion that they are more wild - assed guesses than anything», which is exactly what Herzberg worked on and wrote about.