Not exact matches
This, the
attorney general's office contended, showed that the federal government was evenhanded — and, moreover, because the defendants were black and the
plaintiffs white, here was a case it could
win in the South.
The
plaintiffs»
attorney, George Carpinello of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, said Tuesday evening he would «absolutely» appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals — the same venue where he previously
won a suit that blocked the State Liquor Authority from blocking the sale and marketing of Bad Frog Beer because its label depicted an amphibian giving the middle - finger salute.
During the litigation, the
plaintiffs»
attorney, Keith Scully, said
winning seemed unlikely since «no judge wants to second guess the school board.»
In King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their
attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to
plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «
won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.»
The fee - shifting provision of The Magnuson - Moss Warranty Act requires the manufacturer to cover reasonable
attorneys» fees if the
plaintiff wins their case.
Multi-million-dollar jury awards are downplayed as «learning experiences» by the 32 - year - old
plaintiff's
attorney, who emphasizes that many of these
wins came as Satin sat second chair to the legendary Andrew C. Meyer Jr..
In the libel field, he is perhaps best known as the
plaintiff who in 1990
won the then - largest libel verdict ever, $ 34 million, against The Philadelphia Inquirer, over a story that criticized his work as an assistant district
attorney.
(And one of the product liability jury
wins still required Merck to pay a
plaintiff $ 15 plus
attorneys» fees on a consumer fraud theory.)
Unfortunately for a marginally
winning plaintiff below, the former — the zilch / nada — option was seized by the trial judge and affirmed by the appellate court on review in connection with an
attorney's fees request.
This series is designed to provide
plaintiff attorneys with clear guidance on representing major automobile injury and death cases, and strategies for
winning large damage awards with the least expenditure of effort.
One example mentioned in Texas Lawyer explained the new rule as follows: If a defendant offers a settlement of $ 100,000, but the
plaintiff refuses and goes to trial only to
win a jury verdict of $ 80,000, then the defendant could collect costs and
attorney's fees, but not more than $ 80,000.
Alternatively, if a
plaintiff won a verdict of $ 120,000, then the
plaintiff could collect costs and
attorney's fees from the defendant, and the amount would be limited to $ 120,000.
With hundreds of millions collected in verdicts and settlements for injured
plaintiffs across the state and nation, high - profile media cases galore, and an indisputable track record demonstrating proven success in fighting (and
winning) massive financial awards from some of the nation's largest insurance companies, corporations, medical device manufacturers, government entities and more, Gomez Trial
Attorneys is certainly not your average personal injury firm.
Representing defendants and
plaintiffs in high - stakes entertainment lawsuits, our trial
attorneys win and resolve disputes arising from the creation and exploitation of creative works across all media.
Further, as a report from Eastern Tennessee State University explains,
plaintiffs often are able to
win their cases in court because of close teamwork practiced between private investigators and personal injury
attorneys.
5 Aug. 15, 2016)(unpublished),
plaintiff won a $ 199,000 damages award on age harassment / discrimination claims and sought $ 421,130 in
attorney's fees (inclusive of a 1.5 multiplier) under FEHA's discretionary fee - shifting statute.
The Wage Act was amended in 2011 to allow a
winning plaintiff to add to his unpaid damage award (a)
attorneys» fees and costs, plus (b) 2 % monthly interest on unpaid amounts.
We give
plaintiffs» personal injury trial
attorneys examples of the arsenal of weapons we have at our disposal to put these cases in position to
win, such as sample demand letters, pleadings, discovery, depositions, motions, jury instructions, and motions in limine.
If it doesn't, that
plaintiff could be on the hook for the costs of litigation and for the
winning party's
attorneys» fees (which can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases).