Not exact matches
The forms they produce and share
with us are designed to improve
judicial efficiency, not to help us win our cases.
* Study and explore the possibility of the development of a
judicial protocol
with the aim to: * Allow for communication among judges in overlapping class actions proceedings * Coordinate and harmonize activities in proposed overlapping class proceedings in order to maximize
efficiency, reduce costs and avoid the duplication of effort; * Honour the independence and integrity of the superior courts while promoting inter-provincial cooperation and respect for comity; * Implement a framework of general principles to address basic administrative issues arising out of national and multijurisdictional class actions; and * Provide for nationally - accepted carriage motions.
If the
efficiency of a
judicial system was assessed based on the frequency
with which lawyers use Latin phrases, I dare say Nigeria would make the top ten list.
Mummery LJ points out that the real purpose of the discretion in s 2 (3) is to deal
with «mixed claims» where equal pay is one of several issues before the court and splitting it off would be in the interests of
judicial efficiency; it is not really addressed to issues such as those in these cases.
Judicial non-interference with prosecutorial discretion has been referred to as a «matter of principle based on the doctrine of separation of powers as well as a matter of policy founded on the efficiency of the system of criminal justice» which also recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is «especially ill - suited to judicial review»... (cites
Judicial non-interference
with prosecutorial discretion has been referred to as a «matter of principle based on the doctrine of separation of powers as well as a matter of policy founded on the
efficiency of the system of criminal justice» which also recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is «especially ill - suited to
judicial review»... (cites
judicial review»... (cites omitted)
The mission of the Office of Research and Justice Statistics is to support the Arkansas Judiciary, employees of the
judicial branch, attorneys, and members of the public
with relevant and accessible data to improve the court system's
efficiency, accessibility, and fairness to all.
[9] «The Canadian
Judicial Council is a federal body created under the Judges Act with the mandate to promote efficiency, uniformity, and accountability, and to improve the quality of judicial service in the superior courts of Canada
Judicial Council is a federal body created under the Judges Act
with the mandate to promote
efficiency, uniformity, and accountability, and to improve the quality of
judicial service in the superior courts of Canada
judicial service in the superior courts of Canada.»
Rewrote all procedure within the Criminal Department to assist
with training and improve overall
efficiency and
judicial economy.