«It is actually stunning to think, with the clarity that perspective brings, that you could stand up the kind of ridiculous quiz or survey that they did and then walk away
with psychographic profiles on 50 million Americans,» Weston muses now.
Not exact matches
Though the deal fell through, a Palantir employee continued working
with Cambridge to figure out how to obtain data for
psychographic profiles.
The goal, as The Guardian reported, was to combine social media's reach
with big data analytical tools to create
psychographic profiles that could then be manipulated in what Bannon and Cambridge Analytica investor Robert Mercer allegedly referred to as a military - style psychological operations campaign — targeting U.S. voters.
Its report about Facebook covering the period from 2015 to 2017 — a time during which Cambridge Analytica may have tapped Facebook data to create «
psychographic»
profiles of voters — found that Facebook's privacy controls «were operating
with sufficient effectiveness,» according to copies of its reviews obtained through open - records requests by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC, a watchdog group.
And
with the benefit of
psychographic profiling, he adds, they're able to deliver «content on an individual basis on Twitter and Facebook feeds where people are being grabbed and pulled in certain directions through certain types of posts and stories.
Cambridge Analytica, for example, had worked
with an app developer to create
psychographic profiles for possible use in political campaign advertising.
As the Atlantic's David Graham notes, dirty tricks like these don't really have anything to do
with big data or
psychographic personality
profiling.
The fledgling company courted groups on the right for work on the 2014 midterms
with pitches about its «
psychographic»
profiling, which relied in part on data that appears to have been obtained improperly from tens of millions of American users of Facebook.
On one hand, we're faced
with daily news from insiders attesting to the danger and effectiveness of micro-targeted messages based on unique «
psychographic»
profiles of millions of registered voters.
About 30 million of those (a number previously reported by The Intercept) contained enough information for Cambridge Analytica to match
profiles with other data and complete its «
psychographic» work — learning about individuals and trying to target them
with personally tailored messages.
The goal, as The Guardian reported, was to combine social media's reach
with big data analytical tools to create
psychographic profiles that could then be manipulated in what Bannon and Cambridge Analytica investor Robert Mercer allegedly referred to as a military - style psychological operations campaign — targeting U.S. voters.
Kogan then shared that data
with Cambridge Analytica, which was «building
psychographic profiles» on American voters in order to target them
with ads.
Its CEO, Alexander Nix, claims in a presentation entitled «The Power of Big Data and
Psychographics» (which can be found on Youtube5) that Cambridge Analytica has used OCEAN personality tests in combination
with data mined from social media to produce «
psychographic profiles» — models that predict personality traits — for every adult in America.
The company, which burst onto the American political scene in 2012, boasts of its ability to assemble so - called
psychographic profiles of American voters based on five dominant personality traits — openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — and to target them
with uniquely crafted messages based on their unconscious biases.
He filed a claim against Cambridge Analytica and SCL affiliates to force Cambridge Analytica to disclose how it came up
with the
psychographic targeting
profile it has on him.
Cambridge Analytica's trophy product is «
psychographic profiles» of every potential voter in the U.S. interwoven
with more conventional political data.
Let's start
with the first assumption of omniscience: the accuracy of Cambridge Analytica's
psychographic profiles.
The firm took the
psychographic profiles it was building off the Facebook data at the time and combined them
with voter databases and other sets of data.
The data firm started partnering
with U.S. political campaigns around 2015
with the promise that it had the ability to do what it called «
psychographic» targeting, which allowed Cambridge Analytica to create psychological
profiles to «effectively engage and persuade voters using specially tailored language and visual ad combinations» that appeal to each person on an emotional level, according to Cambridge Analytica's website.
The «
psychographic» personality
profiling the political consulting firm was touting as its flagship offering and which is believed to have relied on the improperly harvested data was refused by the campaign,
with some insiders recently stating the technology doesn't even work.
That data may then have been used for «
psychographic»
profile and to target US voters more precisely
with political ads, though this is not clear.
Sometimes the abuse is malicious and opportunistic, as it was when Cambridge Analytica used an API designed to help people recommend relevant job openings to friends to purposefully harvest data that populated
psychographic profiles of voters so they could be swayed
with targeted messaging.
The firm allegedly used data illegitimately scraped from Facebook to build «
psychographic»
profiles of American voters and target them
with propaganda.
On the other side of the equation, he says sellers will be able to use big data to input highly accurate specs for their home and neighbourhood and then target an increasingly select group of «ideal» buyers
with matching
psychographic profiles — it'll become clearer who to target and how to target them.