Not exact matches
For,
with long - term taxable bonds
yielding 5 percent and long - term tax - exempt bonds 3 percent, a business operation that could utilize
equity capital at 10 percent clearly was worth some premium to investors over the
equity capital employed.
With equity valuations at historic highs and government bonds barely eking out a return, junk bonds offer solid
yields at a good price, he reasons.
With bond
yields so low, it doesn't cost companies much to borrow money to repurchase
equity.
The market's price action since late January hasn't been inspiring, and
with bond
yields up, commodity prices higher and sharp price moves among
equities, it might be time to break out the bear suit.
Bonds have never been a part of my portfolio given the historical lower
yield when compared
with equities.
In essence, investors who reinvest their dividends accumulate more shares during stock market collapses as the dividend
yield expanding allows them to gobble up more
equity with each dividend check they shove back into their account or dividend reinvestment plan.
During times of recession the economy is stimulated
with low interest rates and once they get low enough, the
yield on bonds and other fixed investments becomes so unattractive that money starts to flow into
equities.
Trading across U.S. government bond maturities was range - bound on Wednesday,
with yields little changed in spite of gains in the
equity market in the last few sessions.
A high quality muni - bond portfolio can
yield close to 4 % tax free,
with inflation essentially not existent and
equities at an all time high I'm curious if there is a flaw in my logic?
To the extent that lower Treasury
yields are even weakly associated
with higher
equity valuations, recognize that this effect is also expressed over time as lower subsequent stock market returns.
I side
with Ben in the sense that if one is trying to exploit negative correlation between
equities and Treasuries, the
yield is a secondary point.
Our Global Market Strategies segment, established in 1999
with our first high
yield fund, advises a group of 46 active funds that pursue investment opportunities across various types of credit,
equities and alternative instruments, including bank loans, high
yield debt, structured credit products, distressed debt, corporate mezzanine, energy mezzanine opportunities and long / short high - grade and high -
yield credit instruments, emerging markets
equities, and (
with regards to certain macroeconomic strategies) currencies, commodities and interest rate products and their derivatives.
The investments are subject to the volatility of the financial markets, including that of
equity and fixed income investments in the U.S. and abroad, and may be subject to risks associated
with investing in high -
yield, small - cap, and foreign securities.
This is especially true on the downside because high
yield investors typically are «privy» to bank credit information — trust me, this is true, as our high
yield desk was next to the bank debt trading desk and we were very friendly
with each other — and can see when corporate numbers are deteriorating well in advance of
equity analysts and investors.
We have viewed a 10 - year Treasury
yield range of 3.50 - 4.00 % as a more challenging level for
equity headwinds than a market environment
with 3.00 % 10 - year Treasury
yields.
The fund can also take a position in 0 - 3 month T - bills should the 5 - year note become too volatile, too correlated
with equity, or too low -
yielding (such as in a flat or inverted
yield curve).
The early weeks of 2018 were full of twists for financial markets,
with a rapid rise in bond
yields leading to a short, sharp sell - off in
equities.
Both valuations and consumer sentiment may be at high levels, but
with stable real
yields, rising productivity and «normalised» valuations, the
equity outlook is not necessarily negative — as long as economic growth continues.
Under the extreme stress of 2008, bonds behaved like
equities,
with a sudden spike in
yields and recovery within a year.
However, the
yields of Treasuries are paltry while credit instruments like high
yield bonds exhibit
equity - like risk, albeit
with potentially higher
yields.
When an individual without financial sophistication is faced
with a choice between
equity and fixed - income funds, international or domestic, large - cap or small - cap, high -
yield or treasury bonds, they face choice - overload and the decision can be overwhelming.
Although decades of history have conclusively proved it is more profitable to be an owner of corporate America (viz., stocks), rather than a lender to it (viz., bonds), there are times when
equities are unattractive compared to other asset classes (think late - 1999 when stock prices had risen so high the earnings
yields were almost non-existent) or they do not fit
with the particular goals or needs of the portfolio owner.
With yields having been so low for so long, bonds are suddenly providing some competition with equities at these higher yields lev
With yields having been so low for so long, bonds are suddenly providing some competition
with equities at these higher yields lev
with equities at these higher
yields levels.
With corporate debt markets priced for another Great Depression, High
Yield Bonds are in a unique position to outperform equities given recent runups off the lows while providing a high yield income stream for years to
Yield Bonds are in a unique position to outperform
equities given recent runups off the lows while providing a high
yield income stream for years to
yield income stream for years to come.
The best framework for bonds protecting portfolio capital during
equity bear markets is: average to above - average starting bond
yields,
with an average to above - average rate of inflation — which is set to decline in a recession - induced bear market.
If much of the investment into bond mutual funds that has occurred the last couple of years is for purposes of dampening the volatility of a portfolio — and
with the 10 - Year Treasury
yield at 1.8 percent it's difficult to argue for a different motivation - then it's important to think through the thesis that bonds will defend a balanced portfolio in an
equity bear market in the same way they have, especially to the extent they have in the last two bear markets.
Medium Risk — Growth (M / GRW) Lower to average risk
equities of companies
with sound financials, consistent earnings growth, the potential for long - term price appreciation, a potential dividend
yield, and / or share repurchase program.
But it is still surprisingly consistent considering these
equity bear markets were of different durations, different depths, and all began
with bond
yields at different levels.
For example, in a world where short - term interest rates are zero, Wall Street acts as if a 2 % dividend
yield on
equities, or a 5 % junk bond
yield is enough to make these securities appropriate even for investors
with short horizons, not factoring in any compensation for risk or likely capital losses.
This type of high
yield return, mixed
with the lack of correlation to bonds and
equities makes this an attractive alternative investment.
UBS analysts pinpointed a key abnormality in last week's correction: «a U.S.
equity decline of 7.4 %, as seen over the last five working days, has historically been associated
with a high
yield spread widening of 75 — 80 basis points... The actual move has only been 21 basis points.»
FRA: Given the potential in Europe for being the epicentre of perhaps the next financial crisis as Peter Boockvar mentions, could we see international capital flows come from Europe and elsewhere to the U.S. markets especially as you mentioned there could be pressure on the long end of the
yield curve
with the movement into
equities.
Higher risk (higher
yield) bonds tend to be closely correlated
with equities which means that such bonds do not really dampen volatility or smooth out returns over time when combined
with equities in a portfolio.
It also provides a decent measure of current income,
with a dividend
yield of 2.2 %, versus a median of 2.0 % for all dividend paying
equities in the Value Line universe.
Growth in U.S. real GDP would fall 2.7 % over the three years that follow a vote,
with a corresponding decline of 13.1 % in U.S.
equities and a contraction of 0.53 % on the
yields in U.S. corporate bonds.
Sentiment in financial markets has continued to improve over the past three months,
with bond
yields in most major markets rising and
equity markets rallying further.
By purchasing these companies after a price decline, we find we are able to control risk in the portfolio as these investments often have less downside while offering a decent potential return.The U.S.
Equity Fund seeks to invest in companies
with a lower Price to Book Ratio, lower Price to Earnings Ratio and higher Dividend
Yield than the S&P 500 index.
The disappearance of low - risk
yield opportunities in fixed income markets has subsequently forced investors out the risk curve and into traditionally defensive
equity sectors
with reasonable payouts.
Is it better to sit tight
with my 3 % guaranteed
yield with TIAA - CREF and wait for market improvement or move some money into CREF STOCK, CREF GLOBAL
EQUITIES, CREF EQUITY INDEX and CREF GROWTH?
High
yield hasn't given you quite the diversification against
equities that Treasuries have, but it also hasn't moved in lockstep
with stocks either.
What happens if we extend the «Simple Asset Class ETF Value Strategy» (SACEVS)
with a real estate risk premium, derived from the
yield on
equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT), represented by the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs
equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT), represented by the FTSE NAREIT
Equity REITs
Equity REITs Index?
Importantly, the relationship is nearly as bad even if these «
equity premiums» are compared
with the difference between the realized 10 - year S&P 500 total return and the 10 - year Treasury
yield (to get a true «excess» return).
As the Fed's stimulus program appears to have «peaked» Citi warned investors yesterday to be cautious
with the
Equity markets; and recent price action across the Treasury curve suggests lower
yields can be seen and US 10 year
yields are in danger of retesting the 2.40 % area.
They first look at return correlations and then consider mean - variance portfolio optimization
with global
equities, U.S. Treasury bonds, U.S. high -
yield corporate bonds, emerging government bonds and frontier government bonds.
I've got 12 different investments through their
equity fund in cities
with strong rents and high
yields.
The Closing Rice
Yield Gaps in Asia
With Reduced Environmental Footprint (CORIGAP) aims to improve food security and gender
equity, and alleviate poverty through optimizing productivity and sustainability of irrigated rice production systems.
With fully two - thirds of its money invested in domestic and foreign stocks, private
equity and «absolute return strategies» (i.e., hedge funds), the New York State pension fund has a risky asset allocation profile typical of its counterparts across the country — because chasing risk is its only hope of earning 7 percent a year in a market where the most secure long - term bonds
yield barely 2 percent.
However, the fund's large
equity stake adds risk to the portfolio, which,
with large positions in high -
yield (20 %) and non-U.S. dollar denominated bonds (30 %), is already one of the multisector category's most volatile.»
With yields low and the bull market in global
equities long in the tooth, advisors and institutions need new ways to seek income, risk - reduction without triggering capital gains liabilities, as well as, new potential sources of alpha and return.
With high yield, we find a low level of correlation with Treasuries, and a medium level of correlation with equit
With high
yield, we find a low level of correlation
with Treasuries, and a medium level of correlation with equit
with Treasuries, and a medium level of correlation
with equit
with equities.