Sentences with phrase «with free speech comes»

With free speech comes hate speech.

Not exact matches

You could say this year his thoughts were bigger: Artificial intelligence, saving planet Earth, and free speech all came up in the tech titan's conversation with Recode editor - at - large Walt Mossberg.

The Supreme Court came up with a hackneyed opinion in Citizens United that grants free speech rights to non-human beings.

I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

«Their demands came as Mr Cameron flashed his Tory credentials with a speech that attacked the «risk - free ground of moral neutrality» and called on a return to core Conservative values of marriage, commitment, discipline and duty to fix a «broken» Britain».

Free speech is a right that comes with responsibility, but silencing everything that offends people even slightly results in an oppressed society.

Atheists have free speech too... how come we can not look at Christianity as the insensitive notion, at least atheists are not out to make money with their beliefs.

«Not only are such laws detrimental to free speech here in Europe, but they also enable countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran to justify their own laws, which in the case of 13 states come with a death sentence.»

«Safe spaces» and no - platforming threaten free speech directly, but in reality most students don't come into contact with these sorts of events often.

Unfortunately freedom of speech is contingent to how much money you have given that the media is itself a business that has to make profits as well, so a «lobbyist» like this comes to this program without any ethics, without any remorse but with a lot of money as well to openly acknowledge that: yes, we put money in this governor's elections, we are expecting he pay us back and will stand on our side of the equation, and yes, we have collected (very fast) the private necessary money to run a public relations campaign (of lies if necessary) to guarantee that our privileges are well kept; and he finds a free stand to speak out freely and without appropriate response As far as Liz, I'm not sure if it is only a being naïve issue.

Tellingly, Demand's presentation begins with a nod towards Wallinger's facsimile, which as the German artist pragmatically points out, required studio production of great skill and complexity in order to come into existence twice, the second time to reassert its message in a context that permits free speech.

We all have a right of free speech, or at least should have; but with that right comes the responsibility of telling the truth.

Clearly Dr. Bain is the sort of well meaning but ultimately foolish folk who treat rhetoric as magical thinking, that if they come up with the right magical incantation, that their opponents will suddenly go, «OK, sure, here's my property, free speech, and other natural rights, silly me, what was I thinking, because you MEAN WELL.»

There is no such thing as «free speech» it comes with a very high cost and those opposed to this freedom should clearly understand this.

Wojcicki's comments come as social media platforms wrestle with how to balance a commitment to free speech and editorial neutrality with the public's desire to stomp out misinformation and harassment online.