Harvard - Smithsonian strove to make his life harder and harder, first by banning him from working on anything even remotely connected
with issues like climate change or CO2, then by moving his office away from the astrophysics department to a remote area Soon calls Siberia.
With issues like climate change, the same tendency seems to hold.
Until we reclaim this connection to our humanity, our bodies, and nature, we won't be able to completely connect
with issues like climate change because a chasm exists between us and what's happening.
It's just amazing that, you know, you could capture that much information and it's interesting in the scientific perspective because what we are finding right now
with issues like climate change and conservation is that we really need fine - grained samples from very large geographic areas to really understand the dynamics of species range movements and how fragmentation is occurring and many biogeographic questions, and literally, the only way we can do this is through voluntary networks like this because it would cost billions and billions to send professionals out at that finer scale to understand it.
It does seem that the Right prefers denial of scientific reality than do something about their inability to deal
with an issue like climate change.
Not exact matches
Though some Republicans,
like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, were quick to praise Tillerson's international business experience working
with foreign governments, Tillerson's nomination was met
with deep skepticism from both parties over his embodiment of the most contentious 2016 campaign
issues: Trump's closeness
with Russia,
climate change skepticism, and potential business conflicts of interest.
In early January, Walden Asset Management, a corporate client who uses Vanguard for their 401 (k) program, wrote Vanguard about its proxy voting practices
with respect to social and environmental
issues like political spending and
climate change.
Or you could take a stake in a firm that plays a big role in your
issue of choice,
like Exxon
with climate change, to try and push them in the direction you want.
Kaine will try to score points
with millennial voters on
issues like climate change and student debt, and
with moderate independents on infrastructure and campaign finance reform, while addressing Hispanic concerns on immigration and health care.
Each rally deals
with a specific
issue like healthcare,
climate change, and most recently immigration.
«
Like every advanced industrial country we are coming to terms
with the
issues surrounding
climate change,» he said, in a monthly press conference dominated by the recent floods.
Esposito,
with Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says while her group wants careful consideration of hydrofracking, it's taking attention away from other
issues,
like coping
with climate change.
They are, in addition, now bent on scoring own goals
with issues like not supporting David Davis, mishandling Boris's appointments - why should his man resign over a comment about black people living where they want - and going on about relative poverty and
climate change.
«Firms
with increasingly good or bad performance spend more to influence the outcome of a contested environmental policy
issue»
like climate change, the authors said.
In the process, they seem to have convinced themselves that they are the keepers of the Enlightenment spirit, and that those who disagree
with them on
issues like climate change are fundamentally irrational.
With many Americans choosing to eat less meat in recent years, often to help reduce the environmental effect of meat production, UCLA geography professor Gregory Okin began to wonder how much feeding pets contributes to
issues like climate change.
«
With respect to global
issues like hydrocarbon exploration, fresh water, global
climate change, this is the important stuff.
Inspired by growing up in Denmark and Iceland, Eliasson's use of natural elements evokes an awareness of the sublime world around us and how we interact
with it; his projects often point toward global environmental crises and consider art's power to offer solutions to
issues like climate change and renewable energy.
When I talk to people about
climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on
climate change at a physics colloquium), I always
like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the
issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even
with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the subject.
With an
issue like human - caused
climate change, or the devastation of ocean - roaming species
like bluefin tuna, it seems again that the old kind of framing doesn't work any more.
The psychology of risk perception also confronts us
with the reality that
issues like climate change just don't ring our alarm bells.
The
issue with the Mauritsen and Stevens piece is that it tries to go well beyond a «what if» modeling experiment, and attempts to make contact
with a lot of other
issues related to historical
climate change (the hiatus,
changes in the hydrologic cycle, observed tropical lapse rate «hotspot» stuff,
changes in the atmsopheric circulation, etc) by means of what the «iris» should look
like in other
climate signals.
Nearly all of the assertions by the Australian blogger in the second chart were inflammatory and untrue,
with only thin threads leading to legitimate
issues (one being that the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, as noted in a review by the Dutch environment agency, has traditionally focused its summaries on worst - case outcomes and left out potential positive effects or other factors, like population growth, that contribute to climate vulnerab
Climate Change, as noted in a review by the Dutch environment agency, has traditionally focused its summaries on worst - case outcomes and left out potential positive effects or other factors,
like population growth, that contribute to
climate vulnerab
climate vulnerability).
Because, in order to really make a dent in
climate change and
issues with peak oil, it's going to take both conservation and nifty new technologies
like acres of algae to save our hides.
With life - dependent issues like climate change, biotechnology, and the availability of clean water facing us, we need to empower our youth with problem solving skills that will help them address these probl
With life - dependent
issues like climate change, biotechnology, and the availability of clean water facing us, we need to empower our youth
with problem solving skills that will help them address these probl
with problem solving skills that will help them address these problems.
Grist had played an important role in elevating the
issue during the ensuing years, and we're glad more of our media peers are asking questions about what
climate change really looks
like — and how we're going to deal
with it.
Climate change expertise is «critical» to a company
like Exxon because of the environmental
issues associated
with its operations, according to the resolution, filed last month.
«
With the
issues around
climate change and the way technological innovation is going, that seems to me
like a very risky bet.
«
Climate change is a big, vexing issue and it's really difficult to wrap your head around it from a global perspective, but when you can boil the impacts of climate change down to what it might look like in our lifetimes and in our communities, I think that really resonates with people,» Olso
Climate change is a big, vexing
issue and it's really difficult to wrap your head around it from a global perspective, but when you can boil the impacts of
climate change down to what it might look like in our lifetimes and in our communities, I think that really resonates with people,» Olso
climate change down to what it might look
like in our lifetimes and in our communities, I think that really resonates
with people,» Olson said.
Even if this one hurricane had nothing to do
with climate change, it seems
like people are at least starting to pay attention to the
issue.
If you want to make it an
issue, find people in the center who speak in tones
like this — who can sit across and not yell and not throw out invectives and not even use language
like people
like me create — but have a rational, common - sense dialogue over the challenges of what
changes in
climate could be doing, are doing, and what is the best way to deal
with it.
Actually, some of the GOP candidates have posted plans that deal
with energy
issues, although they don't go in the direction that Sanders and scientists concerned about
climate change might
like.
We decided to emphasize consumer opposition, but also to make the case that New Jersey should retain oversight over utilities to deal
with long - range
issues like climate change.
So in a 2015 poll, they broke out the question a little to It then asks respondents which areas they would
like science and innovation to prioritize over the next 15 years,
with areas such as job creation, health and medical care, energy supply, education and skills, and the fight against
climate change among the
issues they are asked to consider.
And finally I have been encountering a lot of greenies who respond to
issues like sea turtle conservation
with a shrug and «But until we tackle
climate change anything we do to save sea turtles is a waste because
climate change will just kill them all off anyway.»
As John discussed in his post, there are some
issues with this hypothesis (i.e. we know observed forcings
like solar irradiance and aerosols can explain most past short - term temperature
changes without requiring major contributions from these «
climate shifts»).
Having said all this, I agree
with McKibbin that the IPCC models were not done in the way an economist would
like, and didn't add a lot to our understanding of the economic
issues involved in
climate change.
Thanks for that question as it actually gives me an opportunity to say something which I forgot to mention, which is that the extra
issue for developing countries
like China is that
climate change will not dealt
with in isolation from development.
Although the report card has been released to coincide
with the United Nation's Rio +20 Summit, few observers are holding out any hope for an ambitious agreement that tackles
issues like climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.
This is an important question, because (as I have shown in previous research) negativity toward scientists is associated
with the rejection of scientific consensus on
issues like climate change.
THe UK - based Scientific Alliance takes
issue with claims of links between Atlantic hurricanes and so - called «man - made global warming» (aka
climate change): «But no amount of moral blackmail will enable us to tune the
climate to our
liking when long term natural processes are underway, about which we understand very little and can not control.»
Oh and to answer your question the reason it has become a «left vs right»
issue is that those on the right don't
like the policy implications that go along
with acknowledging
climate change.
[T] he United States» reluctance to confront
climate change in a serious way —
like a carbon tax to replace the payroll tax, coupled
with global leadership on the
issue --- [is] as unjust as it is unfortunate.»
The answer to this problem, which is a real one, since many reporters are newbies or don't know the science they are reporting on and are just looking for a few good quotes to bolster their reportagel, is this: scientists who understand the
issue of global warming and
climate change need to write more oped commentaries for major newspapers
like the NY Times and the LA Times and the Guardian,
with their names attached as author, and get the truth out that way.
Now, there could be a number of reasons for this: a) he's genuinely unsure how best to navigate the political waters to get
climate legislation passed, and is cautiously gathering data, b) curbing emissions and fighting
climate change truly does not rank among his highest priorities, c) he's slyly implementing political gamesmanship to push the
issue through external forces
like imbuing his EPA
with the ability to regulate greenhouse gases, or d) a combination of all three.
What
with social networking sites
like Facebook all the rage right now and more attention than ever being focused on the
issues of global warming and
climate change, the moment certainly seems propitious for the unveiling of MakeMeSustainable, a website that draws from both trends.
But last week, over 60 international civil society groups at Cochabamba's alternative
climate summit lent their collective voices in a grassroots campaign to unanimously oppose geoengineering and are urging the public to join
with Hands Off Mother Earth (H.O.M.E.) by «lending a hand» in their photo petition.
With support from environmental and social justice luminaries
like David Suzuki, Vandana Shiva, Maude Barlow, Naomi Klein, Herman Daly and Frances Moore - Lappé, the petition hopes to raise more public awareness about the
issue prior to the next
climate change convention slated for December.
When you have huge economic
issues and great amounts of uncertainty
with regard to things
like sensitivity to a doubling of CO2, feedbacks from evaporation (including increases in clouds and their feedbacks), not to mention regarding consequences, then a legalisitic, «does
climate change exist or not» approach isn't the right way to think about the
issue.