Not exact matches
Still, many defenders contest that even though the polygraph isn't 100 % accurate, neither is DNA testing or eye -
witness testimonies.
Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are
not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do
not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my
testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side
witnesses as His
testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does
not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?
Yet you will
not be able to blame Him for
not revealing Himself to you earlier, because you refused the
testimony of His Holy Spirit who bears
witness to the Truth to every human being alive.
All who were in the Bible spoke in and by the Holy Spirit in boldness when it came time for them to minister the Word, even as it is with me, also to bring forth my
testimony as a
witness: I can
not fellowship with unbeliever's because all they do is cause division, and Christ is
not divided: Therefore; remain as you are: This is the third time I have come to you, and you rejected me for the Word of God: Many did
not even know that Jesus spoke the Word of God through Holy Spirit, so how is it that you are to know unless it be given to you to know: My God is Just and He is right, He knows the hearts of man are wicked and have turned from Him: Thank - you all, there are some that did get it: Thank - you Father in Jesus name Alexandria:
Jehovah's
Witnesses do
not believe in the Trinity,
not because of mere opinion, but Jesus» own
testimony and also that of the apostles and other Bible writers.
Fulfillment: Matthew 26:59 - 60 Now the chief priests and the whole Council kept trying to obtain false
testimony against Jesus, in order that they might put Him to death; and they did
not find any, even though many false
witnesses came forward.
The one place where the word «tahat» isn't used in in the 2nd case which deals with a
witness who gives false
testimony.
Heresay — Evidence that is offered by a
witness of which they do
not have direct knowledge but, rather, their
testimony is based on what others have said to them.
Shouldn't such allegations deserve to be researched and documented, verified by
witness testimonies, and exposed to the light?
Many of us who are
not eyewitnesses have trouble even assigning terms like «victim» or «abuser» when there are contradictory stories, evidence, and
testimony and we ourselves haven't
witnessed the behavior in question (or are very distant from it).
But those first
witnesses didn't just give their
testimony in words.
Steven thanks for your
testimony I agree with your view that homosexuality is
not an orientation we are
not born that way but its a choice.We can choose to live by what our flesh dictates or we can live by what God reveals through his word and by his holy spirit.If we are serious about following God we chose to follow him so it does
nt matter whether gay or straight our choice is to follow God with all our heart.I have never been gay but have battled and was overcome by my fleshly desires
not until i turned from them and asked the holy spirit to help me have i been changed for that i will always be grateful to the Lord.So in that sense we are no different our
testimonys are important and are powerful.Thank you for your
witness and may the Lord continue to use you as his vessel to touch lives and hearts for him.brentnz
Mark and Matthew report that the council tried to get
testimony against Jesus that would justify a sentence of death, but though many false
witnesses were found, they did
not agree in their
testimony (Mk 14:55 - 59; Mt 26:59 - 61).
He who believes in the Son of God has the
witness in himself; he who does
not believe God has made Him a liar, because he has
not believed the
testimony that God has given of His Son.
Despite the existential element in the proclamation, it is the historical
testimony of those earliest this - worldly
witnesses, and
not their subjective faith, that distinguishes Christianity from many other faiths.
The objective temporal / spatial factors, as well as the # of
witness testimonies weighs in Joesph Smith's favor (
not that I buy into either of these myths).
But if they will
not listen, take one or two others along, so that «every matter may be established by the
testimony of two or three
witnesses.»
The average life - span in those days was around 45 years — the likelihood of any original eyewitnesses still being around to testify to the Gospel authors is extremely low,
not to mention the fact that even the classical historian Josephus said that 20 years is long enough to render
witness testimony useless.
Is it just that you don't believe in 2000 year old eye
witness testimony?
Despite the fact that, by virtue of being a woman she would have been considered an unreliable
witness whose
testimony wouldn't hold up in court, Mary Magdalene is charged with telling the world that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.
If you did decide to report to the police, there will be other evidence they can pull together,
not just your
testimony — for example, CCTV footage or
witnesses.
And a true relationship between a believer and their Heavenly Father can
not result in anything less than the production of fruit, which creates a good
testimony, and in my own experience, nothing is a better
witness to the unbeliever than the good
testimony of a believer.
At first the
witness is
not just anyone who comes forward and gives
testimony, but the one who is sent in order to testify.
What we can recognize in
testimony —
not in the sense of the story of a
witness who tells what he has seen but of a work that attests — is that it is the expression of the freedom that we desire to be.
This reasoning of Aristotle displaces the credibility of
testimony to that of the
witness and reveals an important trait to which we are going to return: the quality of the
witness, his good faith that a logic of
testimony can
not do without.
What separates this new meaning of
testimony from all its uses in ordinary language is that the
testimony does
not belong to the
witness.
To Nicodemus: «Truly, truly, I say to you, we speak of what we know, and bear
witness to what we have seen; but you do
not receive our
testimony» (John 3:11).
But what is even more striking in this particular case is that, unlike the four
witnesses giving their independent
testimony, the four Evangelists were
not independent.
Testimony should be a philosophical problem and
not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a
witness who reports what he has seen.
Here we are on much firmer ground than in the case of the Gospel narratives, for
not only is it the earliest written
testimony to the resurrection (written about twenty to twenty - five years after the death of Jesus), but it is first - hand
testimony, and most probably the «only written
testimony to come from one who could claim to be himself an «eye -
witness» of the resurrection».18 Admittedly Paul, on his own admission, was in a very unusual category.
But it follows from this that the orator who «uses»
testimony, who puts forward someone as a
witness, is
not master.
It is only by hearing the
testimony that he can believe or
not believe in the reality of the facts that the
witness reports.
Thus false
testimony can
not at all be reduced to an error in the account of things seen: false
testimony is a lie in the heart of the
witness.
Before proceeding to this task, however, let us pause to note that if the risen Christ is essentially nonperceptible, we should
not expect
testimony to certain appearances to be our primary
witness to his resurrection.
The
testimony that 1 John brings is
not simply a
witness to an historical event, as one might, for example, tell others about a parade that passed in front of one's house.
Your «
testimony of eye
witnesses» was
not «scrutinized by skeptics of their day», though your cult members write it that way in an attempt at credibility.
After
witnessing many real life
testimonies of God's healing and miraculous blessings in my life that it is hard for me to believe Jesus is
not real.
And those who accuse HONORABLE WOMEN but bring
not four
witnesses, scourge them (with) eighty stripes and NEVER (afterward) accept their
testimony — They indeed are evil - doers — Save those who afterward repent and make amends.
4: «For as God alone is a fit
witness of himself in his Word, so also the Word will
not find acceptance in men's hearts before it is sealed by the inward
testimony of the Spirit.
Just try to remember that as you go about your day, and as you obey your boss, and work with honesty and cheerfulness, whether you think about Jesus or
not, you are being a
testimony and
witness to Jesus.
Chrissy from what you have written i believe you have always had a sensitive ear to God that shows obedience and godliness that is
not the norm.You must of had godly influence from parents or someone close to the family.Its shows wisdom beyond your years what you know instinctively has taken me years to learn as my heart was stubborn and hard hearted.By your words i see humility and surrender to the Lord that is a powerful
testimony may he continue to strengthen you in your Christian walk and may you be a blessing and a
witness to others who do
nt know the Lord.It shows God has no boundaries he is able to reach people in any situation if they have ears to hear.brentnz
«The gospel» has a second source which is
not found in the written record of the Bible at all: the historical
witness and
testimony of almost twenty centuries of Christian believers.
Even Jesus had admitted earlier if he bore
witness to himself, his
testimony would
not be true (5:31).
This proximity between a
witness and a martyr is
not always without effect on the very meaning of
testimony.
86:8).48 Bruegggemann considers the divine incomparability to be a fundamental uniting of power and solidarity, and maintains
not that it is expressed throughout the Old Testament but «only that it is Israel's most extreme
witness about God,» assumed though
not verbalized everywhere in Israel's
testimony.49
«54 In this modern perspective we discover that what we have to interpret is the
testimony not for the most part of eyewitnesses and followers of Jesus in the days of his flesh, but «the
witness of the apostolic community.
The Pharisees challenged him, «Here you are, appearing as your own
witness; your
testimony is
not valid.»
«39 The present writer has found great inspiration, much truth, wisdom, and beauty, fervent
witness to the numinous character of ultimate reality in the great Hindu writings through the ages, and hopes to learn still more from them; but he can
not agree with Radhakrishnan's conclusion that «Jesus» own
testimony, philosophical truth and religious experience alike demand that He should be brought in line with the other great saints of God, who has
not left himself without a
witness in any clime or age.
At the same time, Levine found that a full hearing with evidence and
witness testimony given is
not a guarantee under the Assembly's sexual harassment policy.
Howe took the
witness stand on Monday and prosecutors said they don't expect his
testimony to end until at least next Tuesday.