Not exact matches
Today, one of her favorite ways to
teach women to counter potentially creepy remarks is
by answering a threatening or uncomfortable question with another question.
They started The Bucketlist Bombshells, a company that helps millennial
women build online businesses while traveling the world,
by providing online courses that
teach skills like website design and digital marketing.
One of these
women is Alicia Bint, a 33 - year - old freelance illustrator from Milton, Ont., who was
taught to knit as a child
by her grandmother.
I have
taught and advised hundreds of
women who are enormously frustrated at the blockage on boards
by over-tenured, over-boarded, entrenched pedigree directors.
The two
women are considered
by analysts to be experts in the field of computer vision, a subset of artificial intelligence that involves
teaching computers to recognize objects in images.
«
By then, the share of
women going into the traditional fields of
teaching, nursing, social work and clerical work declined, and more
women were becoming doctors, lawyers, managers, and, yes, professors,» Yellen said.
We see this monster in Margaret Atwood's novel The Handmaid's Tale, where a theocratic patriarchy forbids
women to read books, and we see him in the movie Kinsey, in which the future sexologist's pompous, teetotaling, Bible - wielding father (played
by the massive - browed John Lithgow) cows his wife at the dinner table and disowns his son for daring to attend a different college from the one where dad
teaches.
The Christian Bible was written
by men, not
women, and then rewritten time - and - again over the last several hundred years,
by men, when the Bible failed to support the
teachings of those «men».
Plus people (particularly in this case
women) who are feeling oppressed
by this
teaching can find public support very helpful.
(i) a
woman's right to choose; (ii)
teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene»
by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.
It was Christ who encouraged the fair treatment of
women... God who commands us not to neglect the poor and to feed orphans and widows... God who insisted that field owners leave part of the crop behind to be picked up
by hungry gleaners... God who said men should not take advantage of one another
by charging interest... Christ who attacked the Pharisees for their rigid thinking and superiority complex toward Samaritans... How are my values inconsistent with the
teachings and actions of God?
What preachers once
taught as biblical truth — slavery is sanctioned
by God;
women aren't allowed to preach; gambling and dancing are sin — is now rejected
by many churches.
I wish I could talk to Paul and find out what he really meant
by his «
women must not
teach men»
teaching.
It is a fact that the Mormon religion
teaches that
women can only get into the highest level of heaven
by being called from the grave
by their husbands using their secret name.
In the context of 1 Timothy the most likely interpretation that takes into account the immediate context is that, rather than abandoning their intended roles
by demanding
teaching and authoritative positions in the church,
women will find true fulfillment through childbearing.
«teachers,» and «apostles»; who managed the staggering influx of widows and
women into the Christian community
by providing guidelines to ensure that Ephesian churches remained distinct from the pagan cults of the day, but who still expected trained
women to prophesy, to
teach, and to lead.
I am sorry to vent and in no way taking away from what abused
women go through, but looking back, in the name of keeping peace and wanting to do a good job as an educator, I realize now, I have been bullied, mistreated and yes, even abused
by the higher ups, while the level of educational quality and my joy of
teaching have been robbed
by all the PC guidelines that now rule education.
To look upon those prayer wheels not (as some of us were
taught) as instruments of «vain repetition,» but as outward and visible signs of the intention to pray without ceasing, can perhaps lead iconoclasts to more compassionate reflection on the sacramental impulse and on the place of objects — statues and stained glass and candles and altar cloths, beads, bouquets, and kneeling cushions in needlepoint stitched
by some faithful
woman as her own act of participation in the prayers of the church.
If the overwhelming response
by women to this book has
taught me anything it's that Christian
women are not going to take that phrase for granted any more.
What it tried to
teach me when i was a kid, people of color were punished
by god,
women could only go to heaven if their husband invited them, there's alot to the mormon religion that has not been let out, makes one wonder.
Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape
by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»
We repudiate the assumption that Christian faith and
teachings were first «imagined»
by men and now should be «re-imagined»
by women.
He was making the case that men are «hardwired» to protect
women and
women are «hardwired» to be protected
by men, and so the lifeboats on Titanic prove that
women should not
teach or lead in the church.
A remarkable flourishing of spiritualities has combined thoughtfulness with passion, often
by women who also write in other genres (academic and nonacademic), such as Loades, Soskice, Grey, Coakley, Hampson, Jantzen, Ursula King (a German
teaching in Bristol), Sarah Maitland, Monica Furlong and Elizabeth Stuart.
Once, my chapel lecture was boycotted
by the Bible faculty who believe that Scripture prohibits
women from preaching or
teaching men, even while whole communities embraced the Gospel through their female graduates.
The Patriarchal Perspective: This view
teaches that men and
women are both created
by God, but
women are innately (ontologically) inferior and more prone to sin.
Furthermore, as an egalitarian, I am troubled
by the common
teaching from the Church that «motherhood is a
woman's highest calling.»
Ironically, Piper's primary measure of appropriateness is whether a man feels threatened
by a
woman's
teaching.
That's because Piper and many in the fundamentalist neo-Reformed movement are working off of a perversion of the doctrine of total depravity that not only
teaches that human beings are depraved — that is, that our humanity is marred
by sin — but that this depravity renders the world's men,
women, and children into valueless objects of god's wrath, worthy of nothing more than eternal torture, pain, violence, and abuse.
As Cameron Baumgartner noted on Twitter, Piper mischaracterizes egalitarianism
by «repeating multiple times that it
teaches men they don't owe
women care and protection.
I have been
taught this less
by my feminist professional colleagues than
by the students who have attended my classes on passes from hospitals or after therapy sessions, in which they are being treated for wounds inflicted
by men (and sometimes
women) who abused them as children or as adults.
We need to
teach on submission and church authority structures in a way that equips
women abused
by the very leadership to which they were called to submit to boldly live out their gifting as co-heirs with Jesus Christ.
You honestly believe, despite everything we have been
taught by cosmology, astronomy, geology, biology, history, paleontology and archeology, that the World began about 6,000 years ago with one man, one
woman and a magic talking snake.
There is only one way it could not be, and that is if you decide that it
teaches that nihilism is the truth, revealed here
by the pointless failure of Davis's career, so that his having to obtain abortions for
women he impregnated is just another absurd, annoying, and energy - sapping aspect of that, his irrational guilt instincts causing him to have to scrounge for money, and so that his learning that one of these abortions didn't occur is just another sort of misfortune, saddling him with sentiments that he will have no way to really act upon (it is unlikely the that the mother of the child wants to see him), and probably causing him to draw some kind of superstitious karmic connection between a random coincidence of having hit a cat that looks just like one he abandoned, and his driving
by the town his child may be living in.
My attempt to recognize the importance of
women's experience in theology is found in the classes I teach at Union, and also in a section on «Black Theology and Black Women» in Black Theology: A Documentary History, 1966 - 1979, by Gayraud S. Wilmore and James H.
women's experience in theology is found in the classes I
teach at Union, and also in a section on «Black Theology and Black
Women» in Black Theology: A Documentary History, 1966 - 1979, by Gayraud S. Wilmore and James H.
Women» in Black Theology: A Documentary History, 1966 - 1979,
by Gayraud S. Wilmore and James H. Cone.
Christians wish to minister to these kids —
by teaching them the norms about men and
women, about sex and marriage, that have brought decency to the lives of ordinary people for millennia.
If we add to this the sexual activity of young men of the same age, of gay men and lesbian
women at a later stage of life, and that of unmarried and divorced heterosexual couples, it becomes clear that the sexual practice of people in our society is quite different from that held to be normative
by the traditional
teaching of the churches.
In preparing to
teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first
taught the course to an adult class consisting of three
women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures
by which she lived.
I was
taught by Nums and priest to take care of my fellow man (and
women).
Gothard's
teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and
women having to be careful not to defraud men
by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the
woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.
You can hold that a
woman is so made that she enters into her sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment
by giving cooperative support to a male leader, or that she is not; you can hold that a man is so made that he enters into his sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment
by taking responsibility for a female helper, or that he is not; and you can argue across the board for whichever view of Bible
teaching on role relationships fits in with your idea.
The main biblical evidence is (1) the stories of the creation (Gen.I: 26 - 27 with 5:1 - 2; 2:18 - 25) and the fall (3:16 - 20); (2) Jesus» respect for
women, whom he consistently treated as men's equals (Luke 8:1 - 3; 10:38 - 42; 11:28 - 28; 13:10 - 17; 21:1 - 4; Mark 5:22 - 42; John 4:7 - 38; 8:3 - 11; 12:1 - 8; (3) references to
women ministering in the apostolic church
by prophesying, leading in prayer,
teaching, practicing Samaritanship both informally and as widows and deacons, and laboring in the gospel with Apostles (Acts 2:17 - 21; 9:36 - 42; 18:24 - 26; 21:9 Rom.
Then there are the dangerous questions that challenge the tradition itself, like why can't
women teach men, why can't I
teach your children in Sunday school if I'm not straight, what's this head of the household crap, why can't we have marriage equality, why is the church so myopic, and isn't it possible that the whole human race is connected and one and that there is no separation illustrated
by the ancient paradigm of heaven and hell.
Christianity
teaches that this particular individual, and so every individual, whatever in other respects this individual may be, man,
woman, serving - maid, minister of state, merchant, barber, student, etc. — this individual exists before God — this individual who perhaps would be vain for having once in his life talked with the King, this man who is not a little proud of living on intimate terms with that person or the other, this man exists before God, can talk with God any moment he will, sure to be heard
by Him; in short, this man is invited to live on the most intimate terms with God!
Furthermore, the
women «find themselves, and a man»
by leaving
teaching.
Sara's passion for encouraging
women to
teach is matched only
by her stubborn commitment to Christian unity.
The methods of form criticism help us to pick out aspects of the gospel accounts of Jesus» conduct and
teaching which are in sharp contrast to the current practice and
teaching of his day, and which it would not have been in the earliest church's interest to introduce into the material: for example, Jesus» attitude to
women, his table - fellowship with «tax collectors and sinners», his refusal of the epithet «good», and Mark's comment — altered
by Matthew — that in Nazareth «he could do no mighty work».
Catholic schools have a wonderful opportunity to invite trained NFP instructors to
teach this part of the programme which will enable girls to gain a fuller understanding of their bodies and their fertility, while at the same time assisting young men better to understand and appreciate the miracle of fertility, the special role played
by the
woman, and the implications for her physically, psychologically and spiritually as the natural cycle plays out in her daily life.
Additionally, the «
teach that your religion is better than another person's,»... Well as a person who had to take a
women's study and leisure class and also a psychology class
taught by a known feminist, I will report to you there is enough «I am better than you» just within the same classes.
By their interpretation of scripture,
women can not be pastors, and professors who do not ascribe to scriptural inerrancy can not
teach in seminaries.