Sentences with phrase «worse than the possibility»

Worse than the possibility that we are alone is the feeling that it doesn't matter even if we aren't.

Not exact matches

That's even worse than it sounds: Commonly eaten farm animals are rarely euthanized, so the presence of those drugs raised the possibility that meat from horses or even dogs and cats from animal shelters had made it into the supply, as has been known to happen.

Even now dismal possibilities lie ahead — upheaval, anarchy, violence; it may be the League of Nations spoiled by opposition, apathy or treachery, and the whole world going on with this military business, using all inventive genius for destructive ends and making a worse hell of it all than the Stone Age a thousand times over.

You, reading this, are also going to have to be humble — and open to the possibility that your partner isn't bad with money, they just see it differently than you.

Should the «worse than death» meme ever be accepted by society, or adopted into the standard - of - care guidelines established by healthcare technocrats, or implemented under Obamacare cost / benefit insurance coverage guidelines, then expanding access to assisted suicide to — and even rationing the healthcare of — such patients is an imminent possibility.

And actually your third possibility, that god is irrational and capricious, is actually far worse than the other two possibilities.

After the Holocaust the possibility remains open that the universe is irrational, and no event can be called worse or better than any other.

I'm betting there will be a much bigger focus on the CL performances and losses than the fact we're 3 pts from the top... While neglecting the fact that the financial muscle they all want flexed so badly is only now a possibility due to the careful planning and years of competing with the big spenders of the league while laying the foundations for a better future.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

We added another very good / world class player (Sanchez) our ranks in the summer, we also strengthened other areas in the summer and in the Jan transfer window, and we became stronger with Coquelin, yet we can only do worse than last season, and that's not even including the possibility of losing the cup final.

Sunderland will be hard to predict, but if things get off to a bad start or the players become unhappy, than relegation could be a real possibility for Sunderland.

To explain these worse outcomes, they note the possibility of active military duty itself playing a role, rather than the physical injury alone.

However, the city needs to be planning for those types of huge barriers more as part of a longer - term plan, and as preparation for the possibility that climate change and sea - level rise may be worse than expected, warns the analysis, published last week in Science.

There is a greater possibility that your bad choices lead to unwanted looks, than bad genetics.

I have had two children, and have never had any type of hysterectomy and am terrified of the surgeries available and possibilities of failure only to end up with a worse situation than I'm in now.

Unfortunately they can be pretty difficult to diagnose unless you can manually spin them, after removing them from the vehicle, It's best to rule out all other possibilities, rather than stress determining if the bearings are bad.

Intercst supporters kid themselves into thinking that stocks today are a better value proposition than they really are by ignoring the long - term possibilities and Pete is (in my view) kidding himself that stocks today are a worse value proposition than they really are by ignoring the short - term possibilities.

Given that the average is much nearer the best case scenario than the worst case, I am happy to take the risk of comparatively losing $ 25k compared to the possibility of gaining $ 8 million...

While stop - limit orders eliminate the possibility of a worse than expected price, if the market or stock is moving quickly, your order may go unfilled if the broker can not execute your order fast enough once the price passes your limit.

From these levels, it is very hard to conclude that the annualized US market returns over the next decade are likely to be anything better than single - digits, with a substantial possibility of mid-single digit or worse annualized rate of return over that period.

The trader can either accept the possibility that the worse price is appeared or cancel the order with the aim of making next orders that can be better than the previous one.

In addition - and for better and for worse - his career also remained very much an exploration, an outline of problems and possibilities more than a series of clear - cut, bona fide solutions.

But, surely the fact that there is still life on earth despite previous huge changes in our atmospheric composition suggests that the Venus effect is a bad science fiction scenario rather than a serious possibility.

I point out again that these results do not span the whole space of possibilities — witness polar ozone depletion which was much worse and much more rapid than models predicted.

So, the possibility of «worse than expected» impacts really means, more precisely, «worse than our current estimated probability distribution.»

We really ought to be discussing the all - too - likely possibility that the problem is much worse than the IPCC assessments would lead us to believe, and instead you're inventing numbers about uncertainty levels.

Worse still, perhaps, is the possibility that these «indicators» are presupposed to be in decline for no other reason than the truism «climate change is happening».

What emerged most strongly for me was that, in the current atmosphere of the climate debate, the possibilities of doing «value free» research are greatly reduced: any scientific development which paints a picture of things being better or «worse than we thought» has immediate implications for the debate.

Things can be perpetually based, not on what has been observed, or produced by science, but on the possibility that «the picture would be worse than the IPCC painted»... Climate porn, just as Hulme warned.

Climate's superheroes from both camps have never been able to overcome the possibility that the remedy might be worse than the disease.

At best, Stern is arguing, then, that although the climate is worse than he thought, the possibilities for mitigating those problems are better than he thought.

The 4 degree world is still more strange (and uncomfortable) than its 3 - degree counterpart — but worst is the possibility that it may not be stable.

Do you think that your failure to account for obvious possibilities other than what you stated is an example of bad faith exchange?

There is nothing worse than accidentally deleting something you can not recover and until today that was a scary possibility.